00:00 You know, I think that that's really the most important thing that King Charles is doing here
00:04 is raising awareness. And interestingly, we haven't seen that same sort of openness and
00:10 opportunity for awareness from the Princess of Wales. Could you speak to that maybe? Because
00:14 I find that really interesting in that she has an enormous platform where she could be raising
00:20 awareness, but she's choosing to retain a lot of privacy on this. So part of that, there's
00:26 actually, there is a discussion here in the UK about which one is right, and you can make a case
00:29 that both are. So simply because one patient is comfortable discussing their health in a certain
00:35 way does not mean all patients should be. Just stepping back from the royal aspect of things
00:40 for a moment, patient privacy is still a really important and fundamental right. Also, on a more
00:45 speculative level, I would say they do have very different kinds of illnesses and therefore very
00:50 different kinds of treatment. So there's much more to suggest that the Princess of Wales was
00:55 undergoing quite serious surgery, as she mentioned in her statement, and that there was an unexpected
01:00 element to it. She was very apologetic in that statement to people whose events she would have to
01:06 cancel on attending. And in that sense, sometimes when you are a patient, even if you have the
01:13 ability to raise awareness, you are still maybe processing some of this yourself. Maybe you want
01:18 to take it at your own timetable. So I think we sometimes expect the royals to do so much,
01:23 excuse me, not just the royals. We sometimes expect public figures and all royals to do
01:28 everything in a second to ease internet speculation. And they still, however, do have a right
01:34 to process things personally. So the King and the Princess of Wales are two different kinds
01:39 of patients, but it's also two different kinds of illness.
