Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 7 weeks ago
German prisoners on the Western Front could still say they trusted Hitler and then surrender by the tens of thousands to the Americans. That contradiction is the heart of this WW2 history story, where American interrogators compared German prisoners’ experience against the Russians and uncovered what really made armies hold, break, and give up.

Using interrogation reports, prisoner questionnaires, and the work of Jewish refugee interrogators trained at Camp Ritchie, the story follows captured Wehrmacht veterans from Belgium to the Ardennes and into Germany. The answers they gave were not about ideology or tank counts, but about fear, unit cohesion, artillery timing, and the one thing the German Army had no word for. The comparison between the Eastern Front and the Western Front reveals why surrender meant death in Russia, but survival in American hands.

This is military history, WW2 documentary narration, and psychological warfare analysis, told through the actual words of prisoners and interrogators. It also tracks the collapse of German morale in 1945, the role of time-on-target artillery, and the massive surrender numbers that followed as the German army lost its small-group structure and its arithmetic.

For listeners searching for WW2 stories, military history documentaries, interrogation reports, German prisoners, Eastern Front vs Western Front, psychological warfare, and narrated history analysis, this episode delivers a detailed, document-based account. Ideal for history listening, long-form war analysis, and anyone interested in the hidden mechanics of how armies fight and stop fighting.

Category

📚
Learning
Transcript
00:00December 27th, 1944. A village called Edomel in the frozen hills just east of Malmedy, Belgium.
00:09Late afternoon, the light already going. Charlie Company of the 99th Infantry Battalion moved on
00:15the village with artillery from the 230th Field Artillery Battalion, walking ahead of them.
00:21The 99th was an odd unit, even by American standards. A battalion built almost entirely
00:27of Norwegians and Norwegian-Americans, men who gave their orders in Norwegian and wore a Viking
00:32longship on the shoulder. Eleven days earlier, they had been rushed into Malmedy to plug a hole
00:38in a collapsing line. Now they were the ones doing the attacking. The raid took about as long as raids
00:45take. When it was over, roughly 30 Germans lay in the snow around Edomel, and one did not. He came
00:53out with his hands showing, and he was walked to the rear. Now follow that man, because where he goes
01:00is where this story lives. He went back through the regimental chain to a cage behind the lines,
01:06and there he was handed to a small group of American soldiers designated IPW Team No. 46,
01:13attached to the headquarters of the 120th Infantry Regiment, 30th Infantry Division.
01:19What they produced that day survives. It is called Interrogation Report No. 107.
01:26Two prisoners were processed. They are not named in it. They are numbered. Prisoner 3,824.
01:33Prisoner 3,825. Hold on to those numbers for a moment, because they are the first thing in this
01:40story that should stop you. That is not a count of prisoners taken that afternoon. That is the running
01:46total for one six-man team. 3,800 men, questioned one at a time, by six Americans, in a tent,
01:54in winter.
01:55The prisoner from Edomel belonged to the headquarters of the 1st Battalion, 293rd Grenadier Regiment,
02:0218th Volksgrenadier Division. The team wrote down where his battalion had come from,
02:07Blaiv, in the Schnee Eiffel. They wrote down that his division had been stood up in Denmark about
02:13four months earlier. Routine. Order of battle. The bread and butter of the job. And then, somewhere
02:21past the routine, the American across the table asked a question that was not on any form issued
02:26by the War Department. American interrogators up and down the front had begun asking it that
02:32winter, not because headquarters wanted it, but because they could not help themselves.
02:38The question was some version of this. You have fought the Russians. Now you have fought us.
02:46Compare. The answers they got back are the reason we are here today. Because those answers did not
02:52say what anyone expected them to say. Not the interrogators, not their commanders, and not,
02:58I suspect, what you are expecting either.
03:01If you appreciate history built out of the actual documents these American soldiers left behind,
03:07take a second to hit like and subscribe. It genuinely helps get their work in front of the
03:12people who care about it. So who were these men in the tent? Most of them had come through a
03:18place
03:18called Camp Ritchie, in the Maryland mountains. The army had gathered up something on the order of
03:2420,000 men there, and among them were several thousand who spoke German, the way a man speaks the
03:30language he was born into, because they had been born into it. German Jews, Austrians, Czechs,
03:39refugees, boys who had gotten out and whose families had not. They were trained to do something
03:44the United States Army had never really done before at scale. To sit down with an enemy soldier
03:50within hours of his capture, before the shock wore off, and take him apart with nothing but conversation.
03:57Four tools, and no others. What you already know. What you can offer. What you have in common.
04:06And what he is afraid of. Never a hand laid on him, partly because that was the law, mostly because
04:14it did not work, and the men who spoke the language knew it did not work. They were sent out
04:19in six-man
04:20teams and pushed into every division on the continent. And they were extraordinarily good at it. By the end
04:27of the war, the estimate inside American intelligence was that something like 60% of the usable intelligence
04:32coming out of Europe was coming from these teams. Not from code breaking. Not from photographs. From men
04:39talking. Now I want you to sit with the strangeness of that. Because we have gotten so used to it
04:46that we
04:46have stopped noticing. The man from Edomol talked. Not under threat. Not under torture.
04:53He sat in a tent in Belgium, 11 days after German soldiers had machine-gunned 84 disarmed Americans
05:00into a field a few miles down the road at Bonnier. And he answered questions from an American. And the
05:07American wrote it down. And this man was not an exception. This is where the whole thing starts to bend.
05:14Because the Volksgrenadier divisions that Germany threw into the Ardennes that December were not
05:19made of raw boys alone. They were built around cadres of veterans. And a great many of those veterans
05:25had come from the east. These were men who had held positions at Rzhev and Vitebsk and on the Dnieper.
05:32Men from an army that had, on that other front, done things that made surrender in that direction
05:38functionally impossible. Those men had a reputation. And it was earned. On the eastern front, German
05:46infantry in a hopeless position routinely did not surrender. They stayed in the hole.
05:53They fired until the hole was overrun. Hole divisions were written off that way. And now the
05:59same men, in the same war, wearing the same uniform, were walking out of villages in Belgium with their
06:05hands up. And then sitting down and explaining their order of battle to a 22-year-old from Maryland.
06:13Something had changed. And the Americans doing the questioning understood, faster than their own
06:18generals did, that they were sitting on top of something much larger than the location of a mortar
06:23platoon. They were being handed, one man at a time, a measurement of the German army's insides.
06:32So they kept asking the comparison question. Week after week. Sector after sector. Thousands of times.
06:40And a pattern came back. The same shape of answer from men in different armies, in different uniforms,
06:47who had never met one another, and had no way to coordinate a story. It was not about tanks. It
06:55was
06:55not about the Garand. It was not about who was braver. It was about something the German army had no
07:01word
07:02for. And once you understand what it was, you will understand why these men could hold in Russia and
07:08could not hold here. To understand what the Americans were hearing, you have to start with what they were
07:13doing to get men to talk in the first place. And the most effective tool in that tent had nothing
07:19to
07:19do with America at all. There was a sergeant on Interrogation Team 41 named Guy Stern. He had been
07:26born Günterstein in Hildesheim in northern Germany. And he had gotten out in 1937 at the age of 15,
07:34the only one of five in his family to make it out. He lived with an uncle in St. Louis
07:39who was a baker,
07:40finished high school there, bussed tables at the Chase Hotel. When the war came, he tried to join the
07:46Navy and was turned away as a foreigner. The army was less particular. On the 1st of May, 1943,
07:54in Abilene, Kansas, he stood up and became an American citizen. Two years later, he would be
08:00decorated with a bronze star, and the citation would describe his information as being of
08:05inestimable value. What it did not describe was the trick. Stern had gotten hold of a Soviet uniform.
08:13It had come off a liberated Russian prisoner. Tunic, medals, patches, the whole thing. And when a German
08:20would sit down across from him and his partner Fred Howard and recite the Geneva Convention at them
08:26– name, rank, serial number, that is all you get – Howard would work him gently for a while,
08:32and then Stern would come through the flap of the tent, wearing that uniform, and speaking German
08:37with a heavy Russian accent. Commissar Krukoff, he called himself. Howard would play the friend. He
08:44would look at the man's own papers, taken off him at capture, and mention the wife, mention the new
08:50baby, mention the job waiting at home. And then he would say, very sadly, that this Russian is a
08:57difficult man, and that the camps in the East are primitive, and that people do not always come back
09:02from them. Here is what I want you to notice, and it is the hinge of everything that follows. The
09:09trick
09:09worked. It worked constantly. It worked on hard men. It worked on men who had refused everything else.
09:17And it worked because it was not a bluff. Both sides of that table knew the numbers, or knew enough
09:23of
09:23them. Something like three million German soldiers would end up in Soviet hands. Roughly a million of
09:30them would never come home. Men taken in 1943 died at rates that ran past half. The last survivors would
09:39not be released until 1955 and 56, a decade after the shooting stopped. Men walking off trains into a
09:46country their children did not remember them in. And every German soldier understood exactly why.
09:53He understood it because he knew what his own army had done first. Of 5.7 million Soviet prisoners taken
10:00by Germany, more than three million died in German hands. Starved deliberately, worked to death, shot.
10:09That was not a rumor in the Wehrmacht. That was policy. And the men in the ranks had watched it
10:15happen.
10:16So Germany had built, with its own hands, an eastern front from which there was no exit.
10:23Not because the Russians were monsters. Because Germany had spent three years making surrender in
10:29that direction, indistinguishable from death. And every private in every trench, from Leningrad to
10:36the Crimea, had done the arithmetic. That is why they held. That is the whole secret of that famous
10:43eastern stubbornness that German generals would spend the rest of their lives writing books about.
10:48It was not fanaticism. It was arithmetic. Now put the same man in Belgium. Corporal Friedrich
10:56Burtonrath of the 2nd Panzer Division put it about as plainly as it can be put. In Russia, he said,
11:03he could imagine nothing except fighting to the last man, because going into a Russian camp meant you
11:09were dead. In Normandy, there was always something sitting at the back of the mind. That if it all came
11:15apart, the Americans were human enough that being their prisoner was, to some degree, attractive.
11:22Read that again, and notice what it is not. It is not admiration. It is not gratitude. It is not
11:31a man
11:32converted. It is a calculation, made by a professional, about the odds of being alive in five years.
11:40And America had, without ever sitting down and designing it as a weapon,
11:44created the conditions for that calculation. The United States ran its prisoner camps by the
11:50Geneva Convention with a rigidity that annoyed a lot of Americans at the time. German prisoners
11:56in the States ate what American troops on the home front ate. They played football. They watched films.
12:02They put on plays. There were letters to congressmen about it. Somebody coined the phrase,
12:08Fritz Ritz, and it was not meant kindly. It looked, to a lot of people, like softness. It was one
12:15of the
12:15most effective things the United States did in the entire European war, and almost nobody who did it
12:21understood that at the time. But, and here is where the story refuses to stay simple, that explanation is
12:28not enough. Not close to enough. Because if the only thing operating was a safe exit, then German soldiers
12:36should have been surrendering to the Americans in floods from the moment the first landing craft
12:41dropped its ramp. And they were not. In June and July of 1944, in the hedgerows of Normandy,
12:49German infantry fought the United States Army to a standstill for seven weeks. In the Hurtgen forest
12:56that autumn, they fought Americans for 88 days and bled them white. In the Ardennes, in the very week
13:04our man was walked out of Hedema, they were attacking. The exit had been there the whole time. For most
13:12of
13:12the war, the overwhelming majority of them did not take it. Which means the exit was not the cause.
13:18The exit was only the door. Something else had to happen first. Something inside the German soldier,
13:26or inside the unit around him, before he would walk through it. And the Americans in those tents
13:32were about to find out what that something was, from a source nobody in the United States Army had
13:38thought to trust. A stack of questionnaires, filled out in the mud, that would produce a number so wrong,
13:46it looked like a clerical error. Somewhere behind the front that winter, in a requisitioned building
13:51with a stove in it, American soldiers were doing something that would have looked absurd to anyone
13:56who wandered in. They were doing polling. On enemy soldiers. In wartime. The Psychological Warfare
14:05Division of Supreme Headquarters had an intelligence section. And in that section were two men whose names
14:11mean nothing to most people who love this war, and should mean a great deal. Edward Schills.
14:17Morris Janowitz. Both were academics before the war. Social scientists. The kind of men the combat
14:24arms tended to regard as ballast. Janowitz had studied under Harold Lasswell. Neither of them was going to
14:30storm anything. What they had instead was a questionnaire. It had been built with help from a British
14:37psychiatrist named Henry Dix. And it was standardized. Which is the important word. Standardized meant
14:44that a prisoner questioned by a team in Lorraine, and a prisoner questioned by a team in the Ardennes,
14:49were being asked the same things in the same order. So their answers could be stacked, counted,
14:56and turned into a number. Nobody had ever done this to an army before. Not at this scale. Not while
15:03the army in
15:04question was still shooting. And the American teams in the field hated it. At first.
15:11Understand what you are asking of a 23-year-old sergeant in a tent with mud on the floor. He
15:17has
15:17a prisoner in front of him who might know where the mortars are, right now, tonight. And headquarters
15:23wants him to spend his last 10 minutes asking the man how he feels about his officers.
15:29They did it anyway. Thousands of times. And they added the captured mail. Sacks of letters going
15:37home from the front and coming back from Germany. Read by men who could hear every shading in them.
15:44Now, here is what everyone expected the answer to be. The theory of the German army, held by nearly
15:50every allied officer in 1944, was that it ran on belief. Twelve years of the Third Reich. The Hitler
15:58youth. The oath sworn to a man rather than to a country. The Nazis had built a machine for
16:05manufacturing conviction. And the working assumption was that conviction was the glue. Break the belief,
16:12and the army falls apart. That assumption was the entire strategic basis of the leaflet campaign.
16:20The loudspeaker trucks. The broadcasts. Hundreds of tons of paper dropped on German positions,
16:26arguing that the war was lost and the cause was rotten. So the interrogators asked. And they counted.
16:34In January of 1945, German prisoners taken on the Western Front were asked whether they still had trust in
16:41the Führer. 62% said yes. Take a moment with that number, because it is one of the most quietly
16:49astonishing figures to come out of the entire war, and almost nobody knows it. January 1945.
16:58The Ardennes Offensive has failed. The Russians are across the Vistula and driving on the Oder.
17:05German cities are being burned off the map night after night.
17:09Every man in that room has watched his own army retreat across France, and he is standing in an
17:16American prisoner cage in a country his side no longer holds. And nearly two out of three of them,
17:23given a private opportunity to say otherwise to the enemy, said they still trusted him.
17:30Janowicz was careful about it. He noted, when he wrote it up, that a poll number like that cannot be
17:35read
17:35on its own, that it has to be set against the much larger body of what the interrogations actually
17:40showed. He was right to be careful. But the number is real, and it will not be argued away.
17:48Now hold that number next to the thing we started with, the veteran of the Eastern Front walking out
17:53of Aethemol with his hands up. Those two facts should not be able to live in the same army.
18:00A man who still trusts his leader does not surrender.
18:05A man who surrenders does not still trust his leader.
18:09Every model of morale the Allies possessed said one of those two things had to be false. Both were true.
18:17At the same time. Often in the same man. And this is the moment where the story turns,
18:24so I want to mark it clearly for you. Because the Americans doing this work stopped asking whether
18:30the German soldier believed, and started asking a different question entirely. A question that only
18:36occurs to you if you are sitting across a table from 3,800 individual men, rather than reading estimates
18:42in a headquarters. They started asking, what was he doing in the 10 hours before he put his hands up?
18:50Not what did he think. What happened to him? And when they laid the capture reports side by side,
18:58something came out of them that had nothing to do with ideology and nothing to do with courage.
19:03Men did not surrender because they had stopped believing in the war. Men surrendered when the small
19:09group of men around them stopped existing. Not the division. Not the regiment. The 8 or 10 men he ate
19:17with, dug with, slept beside. His section. When that was intact, a German soldier would do very nearly
19:26anything and the polling on Hitler was almost irrelevant. When that was gone, the sergeant dead,
19:33the others scattered. The man alone in a hole in a wood with no one who knew his name. He
19:40became a
19:41different animal entirely, and often within hours. Schills and Janowitz would put this in print after
19:47the war, and it would go on to reshape how armies everywhere think about why men fight. But in the
19:54winter
19:54of 1944, they were not writing history. They were writing a target list. Because if that was true,
20:02then the question that mattered was no longer, how do we make Germans stop believing? It was,
20:08what breaks a German section faster, the Russians or us? And the men best placed to answer that
20:16were the prisoners themselves, the ones who had done both. So the interrogators asked them to compare,
20:23and the first thing the Germans said in answer was not the thing the Americans wanted to hear.
20:28It was a compliment to the Red Army. There was a German tank sergeant, a panzer staff sergeant,
20:35taken by the Americans, who gave his interrogators the comparison in full. And it is worth walking
20:41through slowly, because he was not being sentimental and he was not being clever. He was a professional,
20:48describing two different enemies to a third party who could not check his work.
20:53About the Russian, he said this,
20:55The Russian never lets you forget, not for a single minute, that you are standing on his ground,
21:01and that you are the thing he hates. He will endure hardship that no other soldier will endure.
21:08And then the sergeant gave an image that has stayed in the literature ever since. If nine men are killed
21:14trying to cut a path through the wire, the tenth will go anyway, and the tenth will get through.
21:20That was the German professional assessment of the Red Army infantryman, given to an American with
21:26nothing to gain by giving it. Now hold that, because the same man in the same breath said something about
21:34the American. And it was not that the American was braver. He said the average Russian soldier
21:40lacked the resourcefulness of the American. And he said the Americans were masters of their equipment.
21:47Two different compliments, two entirely different kinds of soldier being described. And the interrogators
21:53heard versions of that split over and over that winter, from men who could not have compared notes.
21:59It stung. Let us be honest about that, because it is part of the story. American interrogators were young
22:07men who had been in this war for months, next to divisions that had bled across France. And here was
22:14a
22:14German telling them, in effect, that the toughest infantry in the world was somebody else's. And this was not
22:21one bitter sergeant talking. It came from the top of the German army, too. Major General Rudolf Christoph
22:28Freiherr von Gersdorf was chief of staff of the German Seventh Army. He had campaigned in Russia. He had
22:35seen the winters, the encirclements, the whole catalog. Two years earlier, he had walked into a
22:42Berlin exhibition hall with explosives in his coat pockets, intending to kill Hitler by standing next to
22:47him. And had only survived because the tour ended early enough for him to get to a lavatory and pull
22:53the
22:53fuses. That is the man. And Gersdorf said that the fighting in the Hurtgen forest was the heaviest he
23:00had ever witnessed, worse than anything he had seen in Russia, and that it reminded him of the attrition
23:06battles of the last two years of the First World War. Now that is a stunning sentence, and it does
23:13something to the picture we have been building. Because Gersdorf was not describing American mastery of
23:19equipment. In the Hurtgen, there was very little equipment to master. The forest cancelled it.
23:26The trees were too thick for aircraft to see through, the trails were mud, tanks could not deploy,
23:33and artillery bursting in the treetops rained steel and splintered wood straight down on men lying flat.
23:40Americans learned in there that you did not go prone when the shelling started.
23:44You stood up and hugged a tree, so that only your helmet was exposed to what was coming down.
23:51Eighty-eight days. The longest battle the United States Army fought on German soil, and one of the
23:57longest it has fought anywhere. And the German general, who had been to Russia, said it was the
24:03worst he had seen. So now we have two German judgments that appear to be in direct contradiction.
24:10The Russian is the harder man. And the hardest fighting of the war was against Americans.
24:16Both of those came out of the same army. Frequently out of the same units.
24:22I want you to sit inside that contradiction for a minute, because the American interrogators sat inside
24:28it for months, and it is the exact place where the real answer is hiding. If you take the Germans
24:34at
24:34their word, and there is no obvious reason not to, since they had nothing to gain, then the thing that
24:40made fighting Americans unbearable was not the individual American infantryman being more ferocious
24:46than a Russian. The Germans said flatly that he was not. So the unbearable thing had to be coming
24:52from somewhere other than the man with the rifle. Watch what that panzer sergeant actually praised.
24:58Not courage. Resourcefulness. Mastery of equipment. Those are not descriptions of a warrior.
25:06Those are descriptions of an operator. A man who is very good at running a machine that is much larger
25:13than himself. And then look at what he praised in the Russian. Endurance. Hatred. The willingness of
25:20the tenth man. Those are descriptions of a warrior with nothing behind him.
25:26The Germans, without ever framing it this way, were describing two completely different mechanisms
25:32of defeat. And they had a word for one of them, and no word at all for the other.
25:38The word they had was Materialschlacht, the battle of material. It was an old term, inherited from the
25:46trenches of the first war, and it meant being ground down by an enemy who has more shells than you
25:52have.
25:53Every German officer understood it. And every German officer used it. And it was, in 1944,
26:01a comfortable thing to say. It let you lose while remaining the better soldier.
26:06We were not out-fought. We were out-weighed. That explanation was wrong. And the interrogation
26:14reports were quietly proving it wrong, one prisoner at a time. Because if the Americans were simply a
26:20mountain of shells, then the German response should have been the same response they had used in Russia
26:26against a mountain of shells, which was to dig in, absorb it, and hold. And which had worked,
26:33at hideous cost, for years. Instead, something else was happening to them. Something that took the eight
26:40or ten men around a soldier and removed them from him, not always by killing them, faster than any
26:47artillery on the Eastern Front had ever managed. The prisoners kept describing it. They described it
26:54in fragments, in ordinary language, without ever seeing that they were all describing the same thing.
27:00And an American, sitting in a tent with a pencil, began to notice that the fragments fit together,
27:07and that what they added up to was not a weight of metal at all. It was a clock. Here
27:13is one of those
27:14fragments, and I want to give it to you the way a prisoner would have given it. As a small,
27:19confusing
27:19complaint, not as a revelation. A German company commander describes moving a platoon between two
27:26positions in daylight. Ordinary business. Men in file, spread out, using the ground. Somewhere behind the
27:34American lines, a lieutenant he will never see says a few numbers into a radio. And then, with no ranging
27:41shots, nothing walking toward them, no warning at all, every gun within reach of that map square
27:48fires, and every shell arrives in the same instant. That last part is the whole thing. That is what the
27:56Germans could not place. Artillery has a rhythm, and every infantryman on earth knows it. The first
28:03round lands long. You have a few seconds. The second lands short. They are bracketing. You have a few more.
28:12And in those seconds, a trained soldier gets into the ground and lives. The German army had built its
28:18entire survival culture on those seconds. The Americans took the seconds away. Every battery
28:26computed its own time of flight, backed it off the clock, and pulled at a different moment so that the
28:31whole weight landed together. They called it time on target. Around St. Lowe, the 2nd Infantry Division
28:38alone was firing as many as 20 of them in a single night, purely to keep the defenders from ever
28:43settling.
28:44Now, a time on target concentration does not necessarily kill a platoon. Often it kills three
28:51men and wounds five. What it always does is end the platoon as a platoon. The survivors are scattered
28:58across a hundred meters of ground, deaf, some of them buried, the sergeant somewhere else or nowhere.
29:05And the men who crawl out of that are no longer eight men who know each other. They are eight
29:10separate
29:10men. Now, put that against Russia. German artillery could not do this. And neither could Soviet artillery
29:18in the same way. The Germans were short of shells from the very beginning. By late 1941, heavy artillery
29:25units on the Eastern Front might have around 50 rounds per gun on hand. Fifty. And it never got better.
29:34In Normandy, German guns supporting the 5th Panzer Army were firing something on the order of 10% of
29:41what was coming back at them. The Red Army solved the shell problem differently, with enormous set-piece
29:48bombardments. Thousands of guns on a narrow sector, announced by their own scale, going on for an hour or
29:56more. Terrible. Absolutely terrible. But a German soldier could be told a Soviet offensive was coming,
30:04could be in a deep bunker before it started, and could come out afterward and find the men he knew.
30:10The American method was smaller, arrived without notice, and could happen anywhere, to anyone, at any
30:17hour, because the network that produced it never slept. That is what Materialschlacht failed to describe.
30:25It measured tonnage. The thing that was actually happening was measured in minutes. And once you see
30:33the clock, you see it everywhere in the prisoner's statements. A German battalion commander pulls his
30:39unit back to a second position at night, correctly, by the book. And by mid-morning, the Americans are already
30:46on the new position, because the withdrawal was spotted, reported, and acted on before he had
30:52finished digging. A counterattack forms up in a wood and is broken up in the assembly area, before it
30:58has attacked anything. A machine gun opens fire and is answered inside of three minutes by something much
31:04larger than a machine gun. Individually, each of those is a bad day at the front. Together, they describe a
31:12system in which every German act was answered faster than the German could complete the act. And a unit
31:18that is always being interrupted mid-motion never gets to be a unit. It never gets the hour of quiet
31:24in which a sergeant walks the line and the men become eight men who know each other again.
31:30Now I want to bring back something from the very beginning of this, because it belongs here.
31:35Remember interrogation report number 107 and the prisoner numbers on it. 3,824. 3,825.
31:47That is the same clock seen from the other end. Because the reason the American response was so
31:54fast was not psychic. It was that a prisoner, taken at 2 in the afternoon, was being questioned by men
32:00who
32:00spoke his dialect within hours, sometimes within the hour, while his boots were still wet,
32:07before he had adjusted to being captured, before he had decided what he was going to say.
32:13Team 46 had done it 3,800 times. They knew the 18th Volksgrenadier division had been raised in Denmark
32:20four months earlier. They knew where his battalion had come from. Half of what he might have hidden,
32:27they already had. And he could tell they had it. And that is precisely why he talked.
32:33Speed produce intelligence. Intelligence produce speed. The loop closed, and then it spun.
32:40And here I have to tell you about the winter, when the loop nearly killed the men running it.
32:45Because in the first weeks of December 1944, the interrogation teams found the biggest thing
32:50any of them would ever find. And it did them no good whatsoever.
32:55Working out of Mobile Field Interrogation Units 1 and 2, men including Victor Brombert,
33:01John Krasny, Max Oppenheimer, Lt. Leroy Vogel, and Max Horlick had been filing prisoner intelligence
33:08bulletins through late October, November, and early December.
33:12Trained men were in transit and in training. Armored equipment was in production and in the depots.
33:18German aircraft plants were busy. Paratroops were being pulled out of infantry units.
33:24The synthetic fuel plants and the dumps were, in many cases, undamaged. The railways were strained
33:31and still meeting demand. Read those together and they say one thing. Something is being assembled.
33:39On the 16th of December, 20 German divisions came out of the Ardennes into a sector held by a
33:45handful of American ones. And the newly arrived, untested, 106th Division was very nearly annihilated.
33:53Twelve days later, the front page of the Paris Herald Tribune told the world that allied intelligence
34:00had failed. The men who had filed those bulletins read that in the field. And what one of them did
34:06next has never been widely known. On the 5th of January, 1945, with the Ardennes fighting still
34:13going on, a first lieutenant of infantry named Leroy Vogel sat down and wrote a memorandum to his
34:19commanding officer at Mobile Field Interrogation Unit No. 1. The subject line was,
34:25Public Criticism of Allied Intelligence Service. It is one of the most restrained documents produced
34:31by any American in that war, and one of the angriest. Vogel quoted the newspaper back at his
34:38own headquarters, the claim that intelligence had failed to detect the build-up, that the experts
34:43had told correspondents Rundstedt had essentially no strategic reserves, that the German air force was
34:49practically gone, that fuel shortages made any large German effort impossible. And then, instead of
34:56arguing, he attached the evidence, extracts from and references to every prisoner intelligence bulletin
35:04his unit had published between the 31st of October and the 14th of December, item by item.
35:11There was evidence of the build-up. Men in training and in transit. Armor in production and in the depots.
35:19Aircraft industry active. Paratroops withdrawn from infantry units. Fuel plants and dumps undamaged.
35:26Railways meeting demand. Signed, Leroy Vogel. First Lieutenant. Infantry. Briefing Officer.
35:34A captain named Edmund King wrote a parallel statement for Mobile Field Interrogation Unit No. 2,
35:39and his ended with a line that tells you exactly what kind of professional he was.
35:45It is nonsense, he wrote, to say the intelligence service failed to keep abreast of what was happening
35:50behind the German lines. Our job in this unit is to collect and disseminate. It would be irresponsible
35:56of us to try to evaluate the enemy on what we see of him only through the minds of prisoners
36:01of war.
36:02Evaluation belongs to the offices that can weigh the whole body of information.
36:07Read that again. That is a man who has just been publicly blamed, refusing to over-claim even in
36:13his own defense. He would not say we predicted the bulge. He said we reported what we found,
36:20accurately, and somebody else was supposed to add it up. John Krasny, another of these men, wrote in a
36:27memoir he never published that knowing headquarters had strong warnings and did not act on them
36:33remained the most frustrating thing in his life. I have told you that story for a reason, and it is
36:40not
36:40to re-litigate December of 1944. It is because of what happened to these teams afterward. Before the
36:48Ardennes, prisoner of war intelligence was regarded at the highest levels as soft, impressionistic,
36:54one man's opinion, useful for order of battle and not much else. After the Ardennes, that was over.
37:02What the men in the tents were producing became one of the most closely read products in the theater.
37:08And that meant that when the interrogators kept pulling on the comparison question through January,
37:13February, and March, somebody upstairs was finally listening. Which brings us to the answer. Here is
37:22what the Germans were actually saying, once you assemble it from 10,000 fragments. They were not
37:29saying the American soldier was harder than the Russian. They said the opposite, consistently, and they
37:35meant it. They were not saying the Americans had more shells, although that was true, because that
37:41explanation had been available to them since 1917, and it explained nothing about why they broke here
37:47and not there. What the German prisoners were describing, without a word for it, which is why
37:53nobody heard it at first, was that the two enemies attacked completely different things. The Red Army
38:01attacked the German soldier's body, and the German army's answer was to make death the only alternative.
38:08Surrender in the East meant a camp you did not walk out of, and every man knew it, because Germany
38:15had
38:15built those rules first. So the Eastern soldier held, not out of belief, out of arithmetic. His unit could be
38:24shattered, his friends killed, his position hopeless, and he would still be there, in the hole, because there
38:31was nowhere else in the world for him to be. The United States Army attacked the German soldier's
38:38group. Not deliberately, not as doctrine, not because anyone wrote it down, but that was the effect
38:44of everything the Americans did. Fire that arrived without warning and scattered a section in a single
38:50second. A response cycle so fast that no unit was ever left alone long enough to reassemble itself.
38:57Prisoners questioned within the hour, so that the next American move was already informed by the last
39:03German one. Air overhead the moment the sky cleared. A supply system that never had a bad week.
39:10Man against man, the German thought he was the better soldier, and the Russian was the tougher one.
39:17He may even have been right. It did not matter. He was never permitted to be a unit.
39:24And then, and this is the part that makes the whole thing lock, behind that, the Americans had
39:30left a door open. Not out of strategy, out of habit. Because the United States ran its prisoner
39:36cages by the Geneva Convention with a stubbornness that irritated its own public. Because German
39:42prisoners in America ate what American soldiers ate, and played football, and put on plays, and somebody
39:48sneered about the Fritz Ritz. Because a captured man was handed to a 22-year-old who spoke his language,
39:54and did not touch him. So the German soldier in the West faced a completely different equation from the
40:00one he had solved in Russia. There, the group broke and he stayed, because staying and dying were the same
40:07as surrendering and dying. Here, the group broke. Faster, more often, more permanently. And when it broke,
40:15he found himself alone in a wood, with a decision to make. And for the first time in the entire
40:21war,
40:22one of the options was survivable. That is what the interrogators found.
40:28That is what stopped them. Not that the Germans admired the Americans. Not that they had stopped
40:34believing. 62% of them still said they trusted the Führer in January of 1945. And that is the point.
40:42That is exactly the point. Belief was never the load-bearing wall. The load-bearing wall
40:49was the eight men beside you, and the certainty that there was no way out.
40:54America knocked out the first and, without meaning to, unlocked the second. And in the spring of 1945,
41:02the consequence of that arrived, at a scale no one in the tents had imagined.
41:08Watch what happens to the numbers, because numbers are how this ends.
41:12Through the autumn of 1944, taking German prisoners on the Western Front was hard, slow work. Men came in
41:20by the dozen after a village fell. In March of 1945, the average was 10,000 a day.
41:26In the first 14 days of April, it was 39,000 a day. In the last 16 days of April,
41:33it averaged 59,000
41:36men a day. I want to give you that in a shape you can hold. 59,000 men a day
41:43is more than four full
41:45American infantry divisions surrendering every 24 hours, for over two weeks, without a pause.
41:53It is a city walking into captivity every day and doing it again the next morning.
41:59Across March and April alone, more than 1,800,000 German soldiers surrendered in the West.
42:07In the same closing months of the war, something on the order of 800,000 surrendered to the Russians.
42:13Less than half as many to the enemy that was actually taking Berlin.
42:19And that lopsided ratio is the entire thesis of this story, written in men. Because they had a choice
42:27about direction. And they made it. Divisions marched west to be captured. Units that could have fought
42:34moved away from the Russians and toward the Americans. And when they got there, they stacked their rifles.
42:41On the 27th of March, Eisenhower told a press conference the enemy was a whipped army. And by then,
42:47the surrenders were feeding on themselves, each collapse thinning the line beside it, making the
42:53next collapse easier. Now understand what that avalanche actually was. It was not a moral awakening.
43:01Very few of those men had changed their minds about anything. It was the two things we have been
43:06building this whole time, finally operating at full scale at the same moment.
43:12The small groups were being broken faster than the German army could form new ones. The divisions of
43:181945 were assemblies of strangers. Boys and older men shoveled together, with none of the years of
43:25shared trenches that had held the eastern units upright. And the door was open. And it led west.
43:32The Wehrmacht did not lose its faith. It lost its arithmetic.
43:37And here is the piece I find hardest to look at squarely. So I will just put it plainly.
43:43Germany had spent four years making sure that no German soldier could ever surrender in the east.
43:50That policy was built out of starved Soviet prisoners, out of camps that were not camps,
43:56out of an explicit intention that those men should die.
44:00And in April of 1945, it came back and took the German army by the collar and pushed it westward,
44:07because there was now exactly one direction in which a German soldier could put his hands up
44:12and expect to see 1950. They had built their own trap. The Americans simply left a gate unlocked and
44:21did not fully understand what they had done. Meanwhile, the men in the tents were drowning.
44:28This is when Guy Stern's Bronze Star citation stops being an abstraction. He was decorated in part for what
44:35the army called a method of mass interrogation. And now you know what problem that method was invented to
44:41solve. Six-man teams designed to work through a handful of prisoners a day were being handed hundreds,
44:48then thousands. You cannot sit each of 59,000 men down individually. So they built ways to sort at
44:56speed, to work a crowd, find the four men in it who knew something, and pull them out of the
45:02mass
45:03in minutes rather than hours. And now, in the spring, the teams crossed into Germany itself.
45:10Which changed the job into something none of them had trained for.
45:14Werner Angris had jumped into Normandy on the 6th of June, his first parachute jump ever,
45:20made with special permission he had personally asked of General Gavin, because Angris had been assigned
45:26to the 82nd Airborne without being a paratrooper, and refused to let his division go without him.
45:32Nine days later he was captured behind German lines, a German-born Jew, in an American uniform,
45:40in German hands, who kept his mouth shut about both facts until American troops reached him near Cherbourg.
45:48He went back to work, Holland, the Ardennes, and then across the border into the country he had run from.
45:56When the 82nd went into Germany, Angris' language made him General Gavin's personal interpreter.
46:02He also took part in the liberation of a camp, Ludwigslust, Wöbelin. Think about who was in that tent,
46:11now, on the German side of the Rhine. American sergeants who had left Germany as children
46:17in the 30s, questioning German soldiers about German towns those sergeants had grown up in,
46:22in a German that still had the local accent in it.
46:27Prisoners who could hear that accent and could not always work out what it meant.
46:31And a great many of those Americans were, at that exact moment, still writing letters to the Red Cross
46:37and to refugee agencies, asking for word.
46:41Guy Stearns' last letter from his mother had been mailed in 1942, postmarked Warsaw.
46:48So there is one thing left to settle, and it is the thing this whole investigation has been circling.
46:55We know what the Germans said about the Russians.
46:58We know what they said about the Americans.
47:01We know why the 62% number and the surrender avalanche could both be true at once.
47:08But there is a question underneath all of it that the interrogation reports do not answer,
47:13because it was never a question anyone thought to put on the form.
47:18The interrogators were the ones who had been thrown out of Germany.
47:21Their families had been taken by the men whose comrades now sat across the table.
47:26Every single day, for a year, they sat down with those men and did not touch them,
47:31did not shout, and got the truth out of them by being decent, patient, and better prepared.
47:39Why did they do it that way?
47:42There is a very simple answer, and it is not the one about the Geneva Convention,
47:46and it comes from a man who was there.
47:49He said it decades later, in an interview, in a single sentence,
47:54and it explains, better than any doctrine, why the door was open in the first place.
47:59His name was John Gunther Dean.
48:02He had been born Dienstfertig in Breslau, and he came to America as a boy.
48:08During the war, he was a private with a duffel bag,
48:11sent to a drugstore on a corner in Alexandria, Virginia, and told to telephone a number.
48:16The car that picked him up took him to a place with 87 buildings on it that had no name,
48:23only a mailing address.
48:25Post Office Box 1142.
48:28That was the secret Strategic Interrogation Center at Fort Hunt,
48:32on ground carved out of George Washington's old estate.
48:36It ran from 1942, and it handled the prisoners considered too valuable for a tent in Belgium.
48:43U-boat crews, Luftwaffe officers, scientists.
48:47The microphones were in the cells.
48:49They were also in the trees, because men will talk in the open air who will not talk indoors.
48:56Dean, looking back on it as an old man, said the thing I promised you.
49:01He said that at 1142, they had everything on their side, and that they were largely accepted,
49:08and that this made a great difference.
49:10And so, in dealing with prisoners and with the men who came over, they behaved according to the law.
49:16That is the answer.
49:18And notice that it is not a moral claim.
49:20It is a description of confidence.
49:23Men who are losing torture prisoners.
49:26Men who are frightened of what an enemy might turn out to be, do not let him play football.
49:32The United States could afford to keep the door open, because the United States was not afraid of the
49:38men coming through it.
49:39And the German soldier, sitting in that room, could feel that.
49:43He was not being persuaded of anything.
49:45He was being shown, without a word, which of the two sides had already won.
49:52Now come back with me to where we started.
49:55The 27th of December, 1944.
49:59Edomond.
50:00In the snow.
50:02Arrayed by a Norwegian-American battalion.
50:05Thirty Germans dead in the fields.
50:07One walking to the rear with his hands showing.
50:11Prisoner 3824.
50:15Prisoner 3825.
50:18Interrogation report number 107, typed up by six Americans in a tent, listing a battalion that
50:24had come from Blyalf and a division raised in Denmark four months earlier.
50:29At the time, that piece of paper was worth almost nothing.
50:33It went up the chain with a thousand others like it.
50:36We know now what it was.
50:38It was one measurement, taken at one hour, of a German army that still believed and could
50:45no longer function.
50:46A man who had probably answered yes if asked whether he trusted his leader, and who had
50:52come out of a village anyway, because the ten men who kept him in the war were no longer there,
50:57and because he had learned that in this direction, unlike the other one, a man could survive putting
51:04his hands up.
51:05What happened to the people in this story?
51:09Leroy Vogel's memorandum and Edmund King's survived, which is why we can say today that the
51:14men in the field had it right, and can say it in their own words rather than on their behalf.
51:20John Krasny carried the frustration to the end of his life and wrote it down.
51:24Victor Brombert became one of the great literary scholars of his generation, at Princeton.
51:30Werner Angris came home with a bronze star and a purple heart, became a professor of European
51:34history, and taught for 25 years. His father had been murdered at Auschwitz.
51:40In old age, he moved back to Berlin, the city he had fled, and spent his last years standing in
51:46front of German school children, telling them what it had been like to grow up Jewish there.
51:51He died in 2010. Guy Stern learned after the surrender that his mother, his father,
51:58his brother, and his sister had all died after being sent to the Warsaw ghetto.
52:03He was the only one who got out, in 1937, at 15. He became a professor of German literature,
52:10the literature of the country that killed his family, taught it for decades, and lived to be 101,
52:16dying in Detroit in December of 2023. He spent the last stretch of his life doing what the whole
52:24American war effort had accidentally proved was the stronger weapon. He talked to people.
52:30And that is the finding in the end. When American interrogators asked German soldiers to compare
52:36the two enemies, the Germans told them the Russians were harder men, and then described,
52:42without knowing it, an American army that had beaten them by never letting them be an army,
52:48and by leaving open a door that Germany had bricked up on its own side of the war.
52:53They did not lose to better soldiers. They lost to a better system, run by men who were not afraid
52:59of
53:00them. Thank you for staying with this one to the end. These stories live or die on whether they find
53:07the people who care about them. So if this was worth your time, a like genuinely helps push it
53:13towards someone else who will want it. Subscribe and turn on the bell if you want more of these.
53:17The documents, the names, the reports that have sat in the archives for 80 years.
53:23And tell me in the comments where you are watching from. If your father, your grandfather,
53:28or anyone in your family served in the Second World War, I would truly like to hear about them.
53:33What branch? What theater? What unit? Say their name here. That is the part of this channel I look forward
53:41to most.

Recommended