Do the Egypt Pyramids Really MATCH Orion's Belt ? Part 01

In 1983 an engineer claimed the pyramids of Giza mirror Orion's Belt, here's what the astronomy actually shows, and what mainstream Egyptology says.
In 1983, an engineer named Robert Bauval noticed that Orion's Belt stars aren't in a perfectly straight line, and neither are the three main pyramids of Giza. That single observation became the Orion correlation theory, one of the most repeated claims in ancient Egypt mysteries content, and this video breaks down exactly why the pyramids of Giza are aligned with the Orions belt according to the theory, and whether the astronomy actually holds up.
We start with the great pyramid astronomy claim itself: how the layout of Khufu, Khafre, and Menkaure supposedly mirrors Alnitak, Alnilam, and Mintaka, and why matching the two requires flipping the celestial map 180 degrees. From there we cover the robert bauval orion theory in full, including the extended version linking the Nile River to the Milky Way and dating the layout to roughly 10,500 BC, thousands of years before the pyramids were actually built.
Then we get into why mainstream Egyptology rejects the giza pyramids alignment claim as presented, from the mismatched distances between stars and pyramids under precise astronomical measurement, to the complete absence of any ancient Egyptian text describing such a plan, to what we know about ancient egyptian astronomy and religion more broadly. We also cover the real, verified secret of the pyramids alignment: how the Great Pyramid achieved true north accuracy and near-perfect leveling using observations of circumpolar stars, a documented engineering feat that doesn't require any unproven star map to be impressive.
If you've heard the Orion's Belt theory repeated as fact and want the full, balanced picture, this one covers both sides. Let us know in the comments which part surprised you most.