Saltar al reproductorSaltar al contenido principal
  • hace 3 semanas
Un investigador que trabajó en OpenAI y Anthropic acaba de renunciar. No lo hizo porque dejara de creer en la inteligencia artificial, sino porque considera que la carrera por hacerla cada vez más capaz podría estar avanzando demasiado rápido. ¿Qué hay detrás de su decisión?

Categoría

🗞
Noticias
Transcripción
00:00An investigator from Antropic, the company that develops Cloud, one of the main
00:04JADGPT's competitor resigned a few days ago, and his reasons are generating a lot of discussion.
00:09the world of artificial intelligence. His name is Jacob Coxon and his departure has a particularity.
00:14Before joining Antropic, he worked for about three years at OpenAI, where he participated in the
00:19teams that developed models like GPT-4 and GPT-4.5. Now, in a publication on the web
00:25Social media personality X, who has gone viral, says she is leaving because she believes that both OpenAI and Antropic
00:31They are moving too quickly towards increasingly capable artificial intelligence systems.
00:36In a series of posts on his profile, Coxon asserted that both companies are in a race.
00:41towards so-called superintelligence, systems that could eventually far surpass some
00:46human capabilities and, in the scenario that concerns him most, to contribute to improving his own
00:52capabilities. Former Coxon and Antropic boss Evan Hovinger publicly came out in support of him.
00:57Hovinger is responsible for alignment research, one of the areas that study how
01:02to get AI systems to behave in accordance with human goals. Hovinger said
01:07who personally believes there is a greater than 10% probability that intelligence
01:13Artificial intelligence could cause the extinction of humanity within the next decade. This is important.
01:17Put that figure into context. It's Hovinger's personal estimate, not a scientific prediction.
01:22Even Hovinger makes an important distinction. He says he considers the risk of the models to be low.
01:27current systems and that their concern is focused on future systems that are much more capable, especially
01:32Those who can participate in self-improvement processes. The idea is that a system of
01:37artificial intelligence can help develop other, more advanced systems, and that process
01:42It could happen again. This is one of the scenarios that some researchers consider when discussing a possible
01:46superintelligence. But that doesn't mean current models are doing this, nor that a superintelligence exists.
01:51There is no scientific consensus on what will happen. What does exist, however, is a debate within the field itself.
01:56artificial intelligence industry on how quickly these systems should advance and how
02:01This development must be accompanied by security and control mechanisms. Coxon believes there is a problem here.
02:07Additionally, there is competition between companies. Their argument is that Antropic can recognize the
02:12risks, but feeling that it has to keep moving forward because other labs are doing it too.
02:16And something similar, though for different reasons, would happen at OpenAI. Therefore, it suggests that the
02:22Large laboratories should exploit coordination mechanisms to control the pace of development
02:27and even consider, in certain circumstances, a temporary pause in some capacity improvements.
02:33What are your thoughts on this? Let us know in the comments.
02:46Thank you.
02:47Thank you.
02:47Thank you.
02:48Thank you.
02:48Thank you.
02:48Thank you.
02:49Thank you.
02:49Thank you.
02:49Thank you.
02:49Thank you.
02:50Thank you.
02:50Thank you.
02:50Thank you.
02:50Thank you.
02:50Thank you.
02:50Thank you.
02:50Thank you.

Recomendada