Zum Player springenZum Hauptinhalt springen
  • vor 4 Wochen
Europe Today: Drohne verfehlt knapp Flugzeug von Selenskyj, Riga diskutiert russische Gefahr

Eine Drohne verfehlt knapp Selenskyjs Flugzeug auf dem Weg zur königlichen Trauerfeier in Norwegen, kurz nach Putins Telefonat mit Trump. „Europe Today“ berichtet aus Riga: Ein Ex-Forscher warnt, KI „spiele mit unserem Leben“.

LESEN SIE MEHR : http://de.euronews.com/2026/09/10/europe-today-drohne-verfehlt-selenskyjs-flugzeug-knapp-riga-ringt-um-russland-kurs

Abonnieren Sie! Euronews gibt es in 12 Sprachen.

Kategorie

🗞
News
Transkript
00:01Untertitelung des ZDF für funk, 2017
00:31Untertitelung des ZDF für funk, 2017
01:00Untertitelung des ZDF für funk, 2017
01:32Untertitelung des ZDF für funk, 2017
01:34Untertitelung des ZDF für funk, 2017
01:3727-year-old Jacob Coxson resigned from Anthropik yesterday
01:42He claims that many of the people building the technology
01:46privately fear it could prove fatal for humanity
01:50Welcome to the program, I'm Stefan Grobe
01:54Our top story on Europe Today takes us to Latvia
01:57Our chief Europe editor Maria Tadeo is in Riga
02:01following a security conference
02:02The Baltic countries are on the front line
02:05of growing Russian threats
02:06and concerns are mounting over a deteriorating
02:09security situation in the region
02:11that comes after the CIA chief traveled to Moscow
02:14last month, reportedly warning Russia
02:17against testing NATO's resolve
02:19Let's go live now to Riga
02:21where Maria Tadeo is standing by
02:23Maria, you have been talking to officials there
02:27what are you hearing?
02:30Yes, Stefan, good morning
02:31because this security conference is underway
02:34and the security picture in the Baltics
02:37is very much in focus, as you say
02:38in the context of that trip
02:40a very rare, unannounced trip
02:42from the CIA boss to Moscow
02:45where he met with Russian intelligence
02:47reportedly one of the messages
02:49that he conveyed was
02:50a warning from the United States
02:52to Russia against escalating tensions
02:55with US allies in the region
02:57namely Lithuania, Estonia
02:58and Latvia
03:01Of course, here when you speak
03:03to Baltic officials
03:04they tell you
03:05again, and this is something
03:06that they have stressed
03:07yes, Russia is a security threat
03:10they also point to increased hybrid activity
03:13but they still say
03:14the picture has not fundamentally changed
03:17of course, they would have to say
03:18that because they don't want to create
03:20a sense of panic here
03:22but just to give you an idea
03:23of the preparedness
03:25and the reinforcements
03:26of some of those security points
03:27in this region
03:28just yesterday
03:29the Latvian Prime Minister
03:30announced that his country
03:31will need an additional
03:337 billion euros
03:34to reinforce its eastern border
03:36of course, inevitably
03:37that money will have to come
03:38from the European Union
03:40when you look at the European Union
03:41there was also a letter sent
03:43by a number of commissioners
03:45including the Baltic commissioners
03:46saying that they believe
03:48there is quote
03:48a deteriorating security picture
03:50when it comes to this part of Europe
03:52and that more action is needed
03:55the message, however
03:56is one of restraint
03:57and putting the focus
03:58on NATO deterrence
04:00and security
04:01what to me
04:02Stefan has been striking
04:04I spent the whole day yesterday
04:05here in Riga
04:06it's also the conversations
04:07that you have
04:08with everyday life
04:10people who would tell you
04:11this is now normal life
04:13for them
04:14that they are aware
04:14hyper aware
04:15of course
04:16of Russia
04:17but they also say
04:18at this point
04:18all you can do
04:19is be prepared
04:20I did have conversations
04:21with some
04:22again everyday
04:23Latvians who told me
04:24at this point
04:25it's about being prepared
04:26but also if you can buy
04:27real estate
04:27outside of the country
04:29some may do that
04:30but there is a sense
04:31of resolve
04:31and also agency
04:32when it comes
04:33to the Baltics
04:34one of the focus
04:35points in this conference
04:37will be about
04:37strengthening
04:38of course
04:38the defense
04:40and the army
04:41the capacity
04:41to ramp up production
04:42to protect
04:44that border
04:44the stress
04:45as I say
04:45at this point
04:46continues to be
04:47one of being preparedness
04:48but inevitably
04:49this conversation
04:50over the past
04:51two weeks
04:52has certainly fed
04:53into the political
04:54debate here
04:55Maria
04:56you also caught up
04:57with Finland's
04:58foreign minister
04:58Elina Valtonen
05:00her country too
05:01shares a border
05:02with Russia
05:03actually the longest
05:04NATO border
05:05with Russia
05:06what did she tell you?
05:09Yes
05:10and we caught up
05:10with Elina Valtonen
05:11who was participating
05:12at a business conference
05:13very much dedicated
05:14to the security sector
05:16and she told me
05:16plain and simple
05:17at this stage
05:18the security picture
05:19for Europe
05:19will remain unstable
05:21it will remain volatile
05:22for as long as
05:23the war in Ukraine
05:24continues
05:24and that is
05:25the assessment
05:26that they make
05:26as long as
05:27the war continues
05:28this will be
05:28the everyday reality
05:30for certainly
05:31the front line
05:32countries
05:33she also told me
05:34and reinstated
05:35that her country
05:36is in favor
05:36of using
05:37the Russian frozen assets
05:38as you know
05:39Shefan
05:40this debate
05:41was shelved
05:41last year
05:42over Christmas
05:43instead
05:43the Europeans
05:44decided
05:44that they would
05:45pay out of pocket
05:46with a loan
05:46but it has been revived
05:48because the cost
05:49of the war
05:50keeps mounting
05:51and at this stage
05:52let's be clear
05:52about this
05:53it is the Europeans
05:54who are for the most part
05:55paying for the war effort
05:57alongside the Ukrainians
05:58who are the ones
05:59doing the fighting
06:00but they realize
06:01the bill is coming
06:02and it will be significant
06:03going into 2027
06:05the other point
06:06that I would stress
06:06is she is a fluent
06:08German speaker
06:09she keeps an eye
06:10on German affairs
06:11and I asked her
06:12about the victory
06:13of the AfD
06:13and this is relevant
06:15because the AfD
06:15has said
06:16they would want
06:17to reinstort ties
06:18with Russia
06:19diplomatically
06:20she did tell me
06:21however
06:21this was not a case
06:23of Russian misinformation
06:24this was not a case
06:25of perhaps Russia
06:26meddling in an election
06:27it was an election
06:28that really tapped
06:29into some of the real issues
06:31that are happening
06:31in Europe
06:32and Europe has to deal with
06:33let's take a look
06:34certainly I would not
06:36attribute the overall
06:38success of AfD
06:39to only disinformation
06:41that would be
06:42totally unwise
06:43and also very much
06:45untrue
06:46but how Russian
06:48disinformation campaigning
06:50actually functions
06:51is precisely
06:52to take those
06:53points of dissatisfaction
06:54in the society
06:55and amplify those
06:56and drive people
06:59against each other
07:00but essentially
07:01and especially
07:02drive people
07:03against their governments
07:04I'm sure that Moscow
07:06is happy
07:07but at the same time
07:08there are true
07:10concerns of people
07:11behind that result
07:12and I think
07:13it's extremely important
07:14we respect
07:15a democratic result
07:17which this was
07:18and first and foremost
07:20I would say that
07:21or at least
07:22based on what I hear
07:23around
07:23is the concerns
07:25over migration
07:26which are behind
07:28the election result
07:30All right
07:31Maria Tadeo
07:32there reporting
07:33from Riga
07:34thank you very much
07:35A plane carrying
07:37Ukrainian President
07:38Volodymyr Zelensky
07:39from Moldova
07:40to Oslo
07:41was nearly hit
07:42by a drone
07:43Norwegian Prime Minister
07:44Jonas Gastore
07:45said yesterday
07:46he did not provide
07:47further details
07:48about the incident
07:50that's why
07:50we're now turning
07:51to our correspondent
07:52Sasha Vakulina
07:53good morning
07:54Sasha
07:55so can you
07:56provide us
07:57with any more details?
07:58Stefan
07:59recently Ukraine's
08:00president started
08:01using more
08:03Moldovan airspace
08:04Kishinev airport
08:05rather than Poland
08:05as he used to do
08:07for years
08:07since the beginning
08:08of Russia's
08:08full-scale invasion
08:09and that was the case
08:10on Tuesday
08:10now the moment
08:11around the same time
08:12that President Zelenskyy
08:13was about to take off
08:15to go to Norway
08:15this is also
08:16around the same time
08:18when a drone
08:19incursion
08:20was detected
08:21first in Moldova
08:22and then in Romania
08:23and the timeline
08:24says everything
08:25about
08:26the timing
08:27of when that happened
08:28so the drone
08:29was detected
08:29in Moldova
08:304.20 in the afternoon
08:33you can see it there
08:34then it crossed
08:35from Moldova
08:36to Romania
08:37now to NATO airspace
08:38this is when
08:39the fighter jets
08:40took off
08:41to monitor
08:42they spent
08:43over 20 minutes
08:44monitoring the situation
08:45and following the drone
08:46until
08:47Romanian military
08:48lost the drone
08:49on its radars
08:51and then it reappeared
08:52shortly after
08:53back in Moldova
08:55and around the same time
08:56this is when
08:56President Zelenskyy
08:57was ready
08:58to take off
08:59and reportedly
08:59according to
09:00monitoring channels
09:02he did take off
09:02around
09:03around 5.57
09:05so with that
09:06drone incursion
09:07first into Moldova
09:09non-NATO airspace
09:10and then
09:11going into Romania
09:12and then returning
09:13to Moldova
09:14around the same time
09:15well that's one drone
09:16that was reported
09:17and that's reportedly
09:18the same drone
09:19that was threatening
09:21Zelenskyy's plane
09:22Stefan
09:22quite scary
09:24scary stuff there
09:25Sascha
09:26Vakulina
09:27as always
09:27great reporting
09:28thank you very much
09:29the European Commission
09:31has unveiled
09:32a legislative proposal
09:33allowing EU
09:34public authorities
09:35to favor
09:36European companies
09:37in public procurement
09:39for key
09:39public services
09:40such as
09:42energy
09:42water
09:43railways
09:44ports
09:44airports
09:45and postal services
09:46a move
09:47that clearly
09:48targets
09:48Chinese companies
09:49in a market
09:50valued at
09:512 billion euros
09:52annually
09:53this comes
09:54as European
09:55policy makers
09:56seek to shield
09:57the bloc's market
09:58from China
09:58amid heated
09:59trade negotiations
10:00as the EU grapples
10:02with a trade deficit
10:03with Beijing
10:04of roughly
10:051 billion euros
10:07a day
10:08for more on this
10:09let's head over
10:10to Paris
10:11where I'm joined
10:11by Alicia Garcia
10:13Herrero
10:13a Spanish economist
10:14with the think tank
10:15Bruegel
10:16and an expert
10:17on Asian economies
10:19good morning
10:20good morning
10:21so is this
10:23a long
10:23overdue act
10:24of European
10:25economic
10:25self-defense
10:26or simply
10:27protectionism
10:28with a European
10:29flag on it
10:32well self-defense
10:33can be protectionist
10:35so you know
10:35in a way
10:36it's everything
10:36but I have to say
10:38that
10:39no matter
10:40how
10:40you know
10:41China may be
10:42reading
10:43the industrial
10:43selector act
10:44which is
10:45this legislation
10:46you referred to
10:47it's actually
10:48not only
10:49for European
10:50companies
10:51in fact
10:52you only
10:53need to sign
10:54the international
10:55procurement agreement
10:56at the WTO
10:58to be part
10:59of the game
10:59i.e. Korean
11:01companies can
11:02compete with
11:02European companies
11:03Japanese companies
11:04can compete
11:04with European companies
11:05so China
11:06could just
11:06sign this
11:07agreement
11:08which basically
11:09means that
11:10you reciprocate
11:11in your
11:12procurement
11:12in other words
11:14that European
11:14companies can
11:15also go to
11:16China
11:16under the same
11:17conditions
11:18for China's
11:19procurement
11:20so in that
11:20regard
11:21I actually
11:21think
11:22this
11:23legislation
11:24has been
11:24heavily
11:25criticized
11:25as
11:26very
11:26protectionist
11:27but in my
11:28view
11:28it's very
11:28reciprocal
11:29and I think
11:30that has to
11:31be taken
11:32into account
11:32right
11:33Alicia
11:33here's an
11:34uncomfortable
11:35question
11:36won't
11:36excluding
11:37cheaper
11:37Chinese
11:38companies
11:38simply make
11:39public
11:40projects
11:40more
11:41expensive
11:43because
11:44the idea
11:45of public
11:46procurement
11:46as I
11:47mentioned
11:47within this
11:48global
11:51agreement
11:51W2
11:53agreement
11:53basically
11:57limits
11:57the amount
11:58of subsidies
11:59or other
12:00types of
12:00support
12:01that the
12:02companies
12:03can offer
12:04when going
12:05to procurement
12:06I think
12:06that's fair
12:07if you ask
12:08me
12:08because
12:09if
12:10Chinese
12:11government
12:11wants to
12:12compete with
12:12our
12:13companies
12:13through
12:14subsidies
12:14or other
12:15means
12:15our
12:15companies
12:16won't
12:16have a
12:16chance
12:16so in
12:17that
12:17regard
12:18I think
12:18it's not
12:19only about
12:19being cheap
12:20but about
12:20being fair
12:21so this is
12:22why this
12:23international
12:23legislation
12:24supposedly
12:25protects us
12:26from this
12:27reality
12:28and the
12:29industrial
12:30select
12:31our
12:31legislation
12:32now
12:32takes that
12:33on board
12:34which we
12:34have not
12:35done
12:35in the
12:36past
12:36all right
12:37Alicia Garcia
12:38Herrero
12:39from the
12:39think tank
12:40Bruegel
12:40thank you
12:41for breaking
12:41it all
12:42down
12:42for us
12:43now
12:44Europe's
12:45housing
12:45crisis
12:45has reached
12:46emergency
12:47levels
12:48with
12:48ordinary
12:49people
12:49in
12:49ordinary
12:50jobs
12:50struggling
12:51to afford
12:52somewhere
12:52to live
12:53that's the
12:54warning
12:54from the
12:54European
12:55Commissioner
12:55for
12:55Housing
12:56Dan
12:56Jorgensen
12:57in response
12:58the EU
12:59has unveiled
12:59new rules
13:00aimed at
13:01curbing
13:01short-term
13:02rentals
13:03such as
13:03Airbnb
13:03in areas
13:05under
13:05so-called
13:05housing
13:06stress
13:07our
13:08correspondent
13:08Marek
13:09Gwynn
13:09caught up
13:09with
13:09Commissioner
13:10Jorgensen
13:10and began
13:11by asking
13:11whether the
13:12new
13:12restrictions
13:13will offer
13:14relief
13:14to Europeans
13:15being
13:15squeezed
13:16by the
13:17housing
13:17market
13:18so
13:19prices
13:19in many
13:20cities
13:20in Europe
13:21are way
13:21too high
13:22so
13:22we see
13:23normal
13:24people
13:24with normal
13:24jobs
13:25not being
13:25able to
13:26find a
13:27place to
13:27live
13:27being
13:28crowded
13:28out
13:29of the
13:29cities
13:29where
13:29they
13:29serve
13:30as
13:30police
13:30officers
13:31nurses
13:31and
13:31teachers
13:32and so
13:32on
13:32so
13:32this
13:32is
13:33totally
13:33unacceptable
13:33and we
13:34need to
13:34act
13:35propose
13:36today
13:36is to
13:37say
13:38where
13:39short-term
13:40rentals
13:40are
13:40a problem
13:41because
13:41they
13:41are
13:41in
13:42some
13:42cities
13:42they
13:43have
13:43crowded
13:44out
13:44normal
13:44people
13:45from
13:45their
13:45homes
13:45because
13:46there's
13:46more
13:46money
13:46to be
13:46made
13:47just
13:47having
13:47a
13:47short-term
13:48rental
13:48and
13:49where
13:49that
13:49is
13:49the
13:49case
13:50we
13:50are
13:50now
13:50giving
13:51the
13:51legal
13:51basis
13:52for
13:52member
13:53states
13:53to
13:54regulate
13:55this
13:55so
13:55we
13:56are
13:56now
13:56giving
13:56the
13:56member
13:57states
13:57the
13:57ability
13:57to
13:58actually
13:58do
13:58something
13:59about
13:59this
13:59important
14:05do you
14:06fear
14:06we're
14:07moving
14:07towards
14:07a
14:08Europe
14:08where
14:08it
14:09will
14:09become
14:09impossible
14:10for
14:10a
14:10young
14:11person
14:11under
14:1135
14:12for
14:12example
14:12to
14:13actually
14:13become
14:14a
14:14home
14:14owner
14:15or
14:15even
14:16worse
14:16to
14:16even
14:16afford
14:17a
14:17rent
14:17unfortunately
14:18in many
14:19cities
14:19and
14:20member
14:20states
14:20we're
14:20already
14:21there
14:21it
14:22is
14:22I
14:23would
14:23say
14:23actually
14:24an
14:24emergency
14:24because
14:25if
14:25you
14:25don't
14:26have
14:26roof
14:26over
14:26your
14:26head
14:27if
14:27you
14:27don't
14:27have
14:27the
14:27opportunity
14:28to
14:28find
14:28a
14:29place
14:29to
14:29live
14:35that
14:36they
14:36want
14:36and
14:36need
14:37and
14:37by
14:37the
14:37way
14:37we
14:38as
14:38society
14:38need
14:39that
14:39they
14:39take
14:39so
14:40really
14:41it's
14:42important
14:42that
14:42we
14:42take
14:43this
14:43extremely
14:43serious
14:44it's
14:44also
14:45important
14:45that
14:46we
14:46from
14:46the
14:46European
14:46Union
14:47side
14:47which
14:48traditionally
14:49maybe
14:49hasn't
14:50been
14:50the
14:50case
14:50acknowledge
14:51that
14:51this
14:51is
14:51also
14:52a
14:52European
14:52problem
14:52so
14:53we
14:53need
14:53to
14:53provide
14:54solutions
14:54from
14:54Brussels
14:55you
14:56and
14:56I
14:56both
14:56know
14:57that
14:57short-term
14:57rentals
14:57are
14:58just
14:58part
14:58of
14:59the
15:05to
15:06do
15:06in
15:06this
15:07mandate
15:07to
15:08help
15:08Europeans
15:09with
15:09this
15:10pressing
15:10issue
15:10short-term
15:12rentals
15:12is a
15:12big
15:13part
15:13of
15:13the
15:13problem
15:14in
15:14many
15:14cities
15:14but
15:15of
15:15course
15:15this
15:16will
15:16not
15:16solve
15:16all
15:16problems
15:17we
15:17also
15:18need
15:18to
15:18do
15:18more
15:19to
15:19build
15:20more
15:20houses
15:21to
15:21renovate
15:22more
15:22houses
15:23to
15:23find
15:24new
15:24purposes
15:24for
15:25buildings
15:25that
15:25are
15:25already
15:26existing
15:26so
15:26that
15:26they
15:26can
15:27become
15:27houses
15:28we
15:28need
15:28to
15:28cut
15:29red
15:29tape
15:29so
15:29that
15:29it's
15:30easier
15:35make
15:36it
15:36more
15:36feasible
15:37and
15:37easy
15:37to
15:38build
15:38social
15:38housing
15:40all
15:40of
15:40these
15:41things
15:41of
15:41course
15:41need
15:41to
15:42be
15:42done
15:42so
15:42this
15:42is
15:42an
15:43important
15:43step
15:43but
15:44it's
15:44not
15:44the
15:44only
15:44step
15:44if
15:45I
15:45may
15:45a
15:45final
15:45question
15:46on
15:46energy
15:46because
15:47energy
15:47bills
15:47also
15:47a
15:47major
15:48concern
15:48of
15:48course
15:49we
15:49know
15:50that
15:50international
15:51conflicts
15:51are
15:52upending
15:53the
15:53energy
15:54commodities
15:54markets
15:55how
15:56worried
15:56are
15:57you
15:57about
15:57the
15:57winter
15:58facing
15:59Europe
15:59especially
15:59given
16:00the
16:00fact
16:00that
16:00energy
16:01storage
16:01is
16:02actually
16:02lagging
16:02behind
16:03I'm
16:04quite
16:04worried
16:04that
16:05if
16:05we
16:05don't
16:05see
16:06improvements
16:06in
16:07the
16:08Strait
16:08of
16:08Hormuz
16:08that
16:09we
16:10can
16:10face
16:10a
16:10very
16:11difficult
16:11winter
16:11so
16:11my
16:12message
16:12to
16:12member
16:12states
16:13are
16:13very
16:13clear
16:13the
16:14faster
16:15you
16:15can
16:15deploy
16:16more
16:16renewables
16:17the
16:17faster
16:18you
16:18can
16:18electrify
16:19so
16:19move
16:20away
16:20from
16:21gas
16:21broilers
16:22to
16:22district
16:23heating
16:23or
16:23electric
16:24heat
16:24pumps
16:25for
16:25instance
16:25the
16:26faster
16:26you
16:26can
16:26deploy
16:27more
16:27energy
16:27efficiency
16:28measures
16:28the
16:29faster
16:29you
16:29can
16:29do
16:29all
16:29of
16:30these
16:30things
16:30the
16:31more
16:31easy
16:31the
16:31winter
16:32will
16:32be
16:32to
16:32face
16:33and
16:33by
16:33the
16:33way
16:33these
16:34things
16:34will
16:34also
16:34lead
16:34to
16:35lower
16:35prices
16:35so
16:36really
16:37there's
16:37no
16:38reason
16:38to
16:38not
16:38do
16:38it
16:42EU
16:42housing
16:43commissioner
16:43Dan Jorgensen
16:44speaking to
16:45Merit
16:45Gwynne
16:46yesterday
16:47we heard
16:48probably
16:48the most
16:49striking
16:49warnings
16:50on
16:50artificial
16:50intelligence
16:51to
16:51date
16:52AI
16:53is
16:53killing
16:54us
16:54all
16:54this
16:55is
16:55particularly
16:56noteworthy
16:56because
16:57these
16:57warnings
16:57are
16:58coming
16:58not
16:58just
16:58from
16:58outside
16:59critics
16:59but
17:00from
17:00AI
17:00safety
17:01researchers
17:02and
17:02insiders
17:03who
17:04argue
17:04that
17:04increasingly
17:05powerful
17:06systems
17:06could
17:07eventually
17:07become
17:08impossible
17:08to
17:09control
17:10do I
17:11get your
17:11attention
17:11joining me
17:13now to
17:13discuss
17:13this
17:14is
17:14Andrea
17:14Renda
17:15director
17:15of
17:15research
17:16at
17:16the
17:16Center
17:16for
17:16European
17:17Policy
17:17Studies
17:18here
17:18in
17:19Brussels
17:19good
17:20morning
17:20good
17:21morning
17:21so
17:21let me
17:22start
17:22with a
17:22blunt
17:22question
17:23is this
17:24science
17:24or
17:25science
17:25fiction
17:26do I
17:26have
17:26to
17:27be
17:27worried
17:27do
17:28we
17:28all
17:28have
17:28to
17:28be
17:28worried
17:29I
17:30think
17:30it's
17:30science
17:32but
17:32we
17:33shouldn't
17:33be
17:33worried
17:33necessarily
17:34if we
17:35keep
17:35all
17:36this
17:36under
17:36control
17:36and
17:37we
17:37keep
17:37it
17:37public
17:37and
17:38open
17:38the
17:39thing
17:39is
17:39it's
17:40not
17:40the
17:40first
17:40time
17:40that
17:41we
17:41build
17:41something
17:41that
17:41can
17:41kill
17:42us
17:42all
17:42right
17:42we
17:42have
17:42the
17:43atomic
17:43bomb
17:43we
17:43have
17:44several
17:44powerful
17:45technologies
17:45it
17:46all
17:46depends
17:46on
17:46how
17:47we
17:47use
17:47them
17:47and
17:48most
17:48importantly
17:49we
17:49don't
17:50have
17:50to
17:50confuse
17:50this
17:51with
17:52an
17:52announcement
17:53that
17:53super
17:54intelligence
17:55is
17:55coming
17:55because
17:56there
17:56are
17:56many
17:56ways
17:57we
17:57can
17:57all
17:57be
17:57killed
17:58with
17:58stupid
17:58technologies
17:59if we
17:59program
18:00them
18:00in the
18:00wrong
18:01way
18:02I
18:03guess
18:03the
18:03fundamental
18:03question
18:04seems
18:04to be
18:05this
18:06are
18:06we
18:07building
18:07machines
18:07that
18:08we
18:08may
18:08eventually
18:09be
18:10unable
18:10to
18:11switch
18:11off
18:11it
18:12depends
18:12on
18:12what
18:13kind
18:13of
18:13goals
18:13we
18:13give
18:14to
18:14these
18:14machines
18:14what
18:14kind
18:15of
18:15powers
18:15we
18:16can
18:16have
18:16a
18:16software
18:17which
18:17is
18:17self
18:17contained
18:18but
18:18a
18:18software
18:18that
18:19governs
18:19all
18:20our
18:20critical
18:20infrastructure
18:21the
18:21railroads
18:22the
18:22telecoms
18:23networks
18:23and
18:24everything
18:24and
18:25has
18:25the
18:25ability
18:26to
18:26dodge
18:26some
18:27of
18:27our
18:27attempts
18:27to
18:28stop
18:28especially
18:28if
18:29programmed
18:29to
18:30achieve
18:30that
18:31goal
18:31at
18:31all
18:31costs
18:32might
18:33be
18:33difficult
18:33might
18:33be
18:34the
18:34genie
18:34out
18:34of
18:34the
18:34bottle
18:35but
18:35it's
18:36a
18:36very
18:36stupid
18:37way
18:37of
18:37programming
18:38AI
18:38to
18:39give
18:39it
18:39powers
18:45to
18:45happen
18:45for
18:46you
18:46to
18:46say
18:47stop
18:48AI
18:48development
18:49must
18:49not
18:50continue
18:50beyond
18:51this
18:52point
18:52it's
18:52a
18:53very
18:53difficult
18:53question
18:54I
18:54think
18:54for
18:55now
18:55we
18:55don't
18:56know
18:56enough
18:56what
18:56is
18:57going
18:57on
18:57inside
18:57those
18:58labs
18:58because
18:58they
18:58are
18:58private
18:59and
19:00imagine
19:01research
19:01on
19:02nuclear
19:02power
19:02happening
19:03behind
19:04private
19:04labs
19:04that
19:05no one
19:05can
19:05control
19:05no
19:06one
19:06can
19:06observe
19:06and
19:07people
19:07coming
19:07out
19:07of
19:07those
19:08labs
19:08and
19:08telling
19:08you
19:09oh
19:09listen
19:09we're
19:10about
19:10to
19:10kill
19:10all
19:10humanity
19:11but
19:11you
19:11don't
19:11know
19:11how
19:11to
19:12control
19:12that
19:12I
19:12think
19:13we
19:13just
19:13have
19:13to
19:13open
19:14up
19:14and
19:14audit
19:14much
19:15more
19:15what
19:15is
19:15going
19:15on
19:16inside
19:16those
19:16labs
19:17and
19:17invest
19:18in
19:18public
19:18research
19:19on
19:19this
19:19I
19:19guess
19:19we
19:19just
19:20wait
19:20and
19:20see
19:20Andrea
19:21Renda
19:21thank
19:21you
19:21so
19:21much
19:22for
19:22coming
19:22on
19:22the
19:23program
19:23that
19:23does
19:24it
19:24for
19:24us
19:24today
19:24thank
19:25you
19:25for
19:25watching
19:25I'm
19:26Stefan
19:26Robert
19:26take
19:27care
19:27and
19:28see
19:28you
19:40I
19:41I
19:41I
19:41I
19:41I
19:42I
19:42I
19:44I
19:45I
19:48I
19:49I
19:49I
19:50I
19:52I
19:53I
19:56I
19:59I
20:00I
20:00I
20:00I

Empfohlen