- 13 minutes ago
After banning several major outlets from the White House, US President Donald Trump has launched his own livestream operation, dubbed "Trump TV," while networks boycott official presidential events in protest.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00And joining me now is someone who knows firsthand how important access to the White House is when
00:04your job is to cover the president. Frank Sesno is CNN's former Washington bureau chief. Before
00:10that, he was a White House correspondent. He's now a professor at George Washington University's
00:14School of Media and Public Affairs. Frank, it's good to have you back on the program.
00:19Let's talk about what we saw yesterday to begin with here. We saw Trump cut the ribbon and dedicate
00:24this new helipad at the White House. Viewers couldn't hear him on the White House feed.
00:29There was no pool camera video for news outlets to use. Has he underestimated how much he still needs
00:36the media and the networks? Yes, I think he has. I mean, he has his truth social and social media
00:44and a remarkable capacity to go out to people. But there is still an enormous presence that these
00:50television networks, which also have an Internet presence, have. The evening newscasts of the old
00:57traditional newscasts, news networks, have close to 12, 13, 14 million people a night
01:05watching. The morning shows that these networks put on are also millions of people. CNN and Fox News,
01:12which are part of the pool. And Fox News, a conservative-leading network, which is also
01:17going along with this. More, you know, millions over the course of a day, the cumulative rating,
01:22as we call it. So there are many millions of people that Donald Trump won't get to. And what
01:26we know about Donald Trump is he loves cameras and he loves microphones and he wants to be out there
01:32and in front of as many people as possible. So, yes, I think he's miscalculated.
01:36Are you surprised by the show of solidarity that we're seeing from so many news outlets? I mean,
01:41as you said, even Fox is standing with CNN and MS Now. No, I'm not surprised. I'm very pleased,
01:50but I'm not surprised. The networks have done this in the past over time with reporters from
01:56varying sides. When I was at the White House many, many years ago, there was an attempt
02:00at one point for the White House to be the sole camera and they would provide the video. It was
02:06very
02:06important video at the time. And all the networks said, nope, we have independent access. We're not
02:12going to take White House handouts when this is the building we're in and that we're going to cover.
02:17So I'm very gratified that there is this kind of solidarity. And the Washington Post and the New
02:22York Times and others, NPR, National Public Radio, also going in variations of this to show
02:28solidarity with it. It is a vital point to make. The White House, of all places, is a place where
02:35access should be open to all professional journalists who are there to cover the president
02:41as the presidency should be covered. Trump has targeted the news media from day one.
02:47And at the same time, he attended the White House correspondence dinner this year. So what do you
02:54think or why do you think he has all of a sudden decided that it's time to ban what he
02:59calls the fake
03:00news crews? I mean, why now? Well, first of all, let me just say that when he attended the White
03:06House Correspondents Association dinner, he was a rather blunt guest because he was very, very
03:14critical of the people he was there. I have been to many of those dinners, by the way, and this
03:18is
03:18something worth noting at this moment. Every president I have covered, and I've been here since
03:23Jimmy Carter, has said, I don't really always like the coverage I get, but I recognize the job you
03:29have to do in an open society and a democracy. As far as Trump and why now, we don't know.
03:35He hasn't
03:36given a good reason other than we have heard that he was shown the cumulative coverage of Politico,
03:44one of the banned news organizations, and saw it was highly negative and said, you know,
03:49I don't want you here anymore, along and then through CNN and MSNOW in for good measure. But
03:56again, this is the person who has sued the BBC for $10 billion, the Wall Street Journal,
04:01he tried for $10 billion, the New York Times, and others, because he does not like the coverage
04:08that doesn't reflect well on him, pure and simple. Trump says that fake news threatens national
04:16security. And you're the man I want to ask about that. And correct me if I'm wrong, but on the
04:21day
04:21after 9-11, you dealt with a White House request to limit reporting. What made that different from
04:30what Trump may or may not be claiming now in terms of national security?
04:36I don't know what he's claiming. I don't know what he means. And that's part of the problem. The other
04:41thing that's different then than now is the relationship between the press and the White House is
04:45so deteriorated because of all of this. That particular incident you were talking about was
04:50right after the 9-11 bombings. We were asked not to reveal the whereabouts of the president,
04:56vice president, and the cabinet assembled when they were all together. But Ari Fleischer, who was the
05:00press secretary at the time, notably started the conversation by saying, I recognize the
05:05constitutional right and responsibility you have as a free press. So I can't tell you to do this,
05:11but I'm asking. And that is what has really disappeared. I negotiated a lot as bureau chief
05:17with the Pentagon, with the White House, with others. If there are military operations underway,
05:22or we had a story that they knew about that they thought could threaten lives or ongoing operations,
05:28we would enter into a conversation about whether we would hold the story or we would go right with
05:33it. And sometimes it could be very testy, but it was a conversation. And that reflected the respect
05:38that I think that both sides had, adversarial though the relationship was. There is no
05:43explanation behind this, and there has been no conversation that I can determine as to what
05:48the national security threat is, other than, again, that Trump doesn't like the coverage he's been
05:53seeing. You ran CNN's Washington Bureau. Would you suspend the shared camera coverage in protest
06:01if that left the White House with more control over the pictures? If you were the boss today,
06:07what would you do? Well, I certainly would do what has been done now. And I would say we are
06:12not going
06:13to use pool video at all, because it's not going to, if it's not a pool for all, it's not
06:19a pool for
06:19any. That's the purpose of the pool. And by banning news organizations, one of the points of leverage
06:26that the White House news, that these White House news organizations have is to say that we're going to
06:31do this kind of thing. That it's a very important line in the sand, that the job that these news
06:38organizations do, and they are not perfect. There's lots to criticize. Fair enough. But that the job
06:45that they do is about covering the president and the presidency, that they hold power to account,
06:52that that means asking tough questions. And it also means that there will be times where the White House
06:58doesn't like the coverage, doesn't like the commentary that goes with it, whether it's on Fox
07:04on the right, or MSNOW on the left. But the White House in the past has understood that that's,
07:11as I said, goes with the territory. This is a different thing. So if I were in that position,
07:15yes, I would be drawing a line on the sand very clearly. Now we also have Trump TV. And I
07:23heard
07:23one commentator earlier today saying, well, this proves it. The United States now has state-run
07:31media through Trump TV. What do you say to that?
07:36You know, if he wants to do Trump TV, fine. I'm a little less concerned about that because
07:41every White House has put out its own press statements. And the Obama White House and the
07:47Biden White House, you know, put out their social media feeds, and that was Obama TV or Biden TV
07:53without TV. Nobody's going to take Trump TV as a, it's not, you know, it's not, to my knowledge
08:00anyway, funded by taxpayer dollars. And I don't know where it is or who watches it. What I'm much more
08:07concerned about is the idea that they can undermine the independent coverage of others and get away
08:13with that. Trump TV and Trump social for that matter, while they will still reach people,
08:19are one vehicle among many. And I think the most important thing is to keep eyes on the prize.
08:26There needs to be the full and proper access to the White House for coverage.
08:30You know, some MAGA supporters, Trump supporters could say, I don't trust CNN. Why should I care
08:38whether its reporters get into the White House? What's your answer to that?
08:44Next president is Democrat, hypothetically, and they kick Fox out, or Newsmax, or one of the
08:49conservative networks. How do they feel about that? That would be my answer. This is a precedent.
08:54This is about the premise and principle that all respectable, professional, and I use those
09:02adjectives purposely, news organizations that cover the White House should have access to the White House.
09:09One more hypothetical here. If you were running CNN tonight, would you use White House footage at all?
09:17I mean, how do you show the president without letting him decide what viewers see? I mean,
09:24we have a story to tell. We're a visual medium. How do you square this circle?
09:31I would simply say, look, we've got this spat going on with the White House, and we're going to deal
09:35with that. He's still the president of the United States. We're still going to cover him. CNN took
09:40the president at the United Nations yesterday, and his travels in New York for the UN General
09:47Assembly. They're going to cover him. What they're not going to do is a pool. What they're not going to
09:51do is go out of their way to elevate the... And what's interesting, I'm noticing on other networks
09:58is there's just less Trump video and less Trump audio. So you can say what the president did. You
10:06can describe what something looked like. But he started this, and these news organizations, I think,
10:12have a point to make. But they also have a very important responsibility. The president is a
10:18newsmaker. And it's very much like what's happened over at the Pentagon. The Pentagon basically has
10:24kicked out most of the professional journalists who covered the place because Pete Hegseth wanted
10:29them to sign a document about certain coverage restrictions that were just unacceptable to all
10:34of them, including Fox News. And so they're not in the building anymore. That hurts coverage,
10:39but they're still reporting on what's going on at the Pentagon and with the military and in Iran and
10:46beyond. Before we run out of time, I know a judge is scheduled to hear the challenge from CNN,
10:51MSNL, and Politico tomorrow, even if the networks win their access back. How do you stop the threat
10:57of another ban from changing the journalism? I mean, this could happen again and again.
11:04It can happen again and again. You're absolutely right. And it can take other forms.
11:08They can agree to freeze some of these journalists out of certain events if they want. Certainly never
11:14call on them in a press conference or a press briefing. I mean, there are things that they
11:18can do, and it's been done in the past, in the past, before all of this. If the press secretary
11:22or the president was angry at somebody, they'd call them out and kind of give them a hard time,
11:27or as I say, not call on them in a press briefing or in a press conference. This is petty
11:34stuff.
11:35I hope this will pass. But for now, it's a very dramatic and perilous standoff that's taking place.
11:44Frank Sesno, as always, Frank, good to have you on the program. We appreciate you
11:47sharing your insights and your experience and the wisdom that comes from that. Thank you.
11:53My pleasure. Thank you.