Skip to playerSkip to main content
Sen. Ted Cruz CONFRONTS former Special Counsel Jack Smith during a HEATED Senate Judiciary hearing over the controversial Arctic Frost investigation and subpoenas involving Republican lawmakers and Trump-related targets. Cruz pressed Smith over the collection of PHONE RECORDS and other information, including concerns raised by Republicans about SMALL-DOLLAR DONOR DATA and the scope of the investigation. Senate Republicans have been examining the subpoenas and records obtained during the probe, while Smith has defended the investigative actions as LAWFUL. The tense exchange puts new focus on the Arctic Frost investigation, congressional oversight, and the handling of sensitive records involving political figures and organizations.

#TedCruz #JackSmith #ArcticFrost #SenateJudiciary #SenateHearing #TedCruzVsJackSmith #JackSmithHearing #ArcticFrostInvestigation #TrumpInvestigation #TrumpRelatedInvestigation #SenateRepublicans #CongressionalOversight #PhoneRecords #Subpoenas #PoliticalInvestigation #RepublicanLawmakers #SmallDollarDonors #DonorData #SenateNews #USPolitics #BreakingNews #PoliticalNews #TrumpNews #CruzNews #JackSmithInvestigation

~HT.318~PR.460~ED.103~GR.122~VG.HM~

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Did your team subpoena records concerning the Republican National Committee?
00:06We subpoenaed a number of records.
00:09That's a yes or no question.
00:12I do not have, I just want to be clear with you, Senator, I do not have a recollection of
00:16every subpoena.
00:17We did subpoena numerous records.
00:20Did your team subpoena the RNC?
00:22I would have to look at those records, but we did.
00:24You're testifying you don't remember? Yes, no, or I don't remember. Those are your three options.
00:28It is very possible. I do not have a recollection of every subpoena.
00:31Okay, did your team subpoena Turning Point USA?
00:36Again, I would have to look at the records.
00:37Do you have any idea who you subpoenaed?
00:39Can you name, all right, let me help you.
00:42Did your team subpoena the Conservative Partnership Institute?
00:47That I do remember, yes.
00:48Okay, good, we found one.
00:50And I can explain why.
00:51Did your subpoenas demand communications with Fox News?
00:57The subpoenas that we issued did ask for communication regarding ad buys, because it was relevant to the false statements
01:05we were investigating.
01:06So purchasing advertising on a news agency you somehow believe is criminal.
01:10Did your team seek and obtain donor and fundraising data?
01:16I would have to look at the subpoenas, but again, I'm happy to.
01:19You don't know if you had donor and fundraising data?
01:22I'm happy to explain why we issued these subpoenas.
01:24Do you know if you had donor and fundraising data?
01:26I would have to look at the subpoenas.
01:28You don't know?
01:29Are you testifying right now you don't know if you obtained donor and fundraising data?
01:37You can sigh all you like.
01:39It's a very simple question.
01:40You know damn well you did.
01:41You've been questioned about the checks that you guys got.
01:44You know the answer.
01:46So why don't you answer the question.
01:49Did your team obtain donor and fundraising information?
01:53It's a yes.
01:54You can say yes.
01:56I do not recall the attachments to specific subpoenas.
02:00I'm happy to explain why we issued.
02:02So you're testifying you don't remember if you got donor and fundraising material?
02:06Really?
02:08I do not recall because I have not seen those subpoenas in a very long time.
02:13But I'm happy to explain why we issued.
02:16Look, look, I get you want to dance and avoid the questions.
02:18I understand it because you can't answer a simple straightforward question.
02:21All in all, you issued 197 subpoenas to 34 individuals at least and 163 businesses.
02:28And you sought records on at least 430 Republican individuals and entities.
02:33Is that right?
02:34And you're going to say you don't remember.
02:35Is that correct?
02:37I do not recall those numbers.
02:39I understand.
02:40You know, if you look at the list, there is one thing that is consistent.
02:44Every name on it is a Republican.
02:47Is it your view?
02:48Is it a crime to be a Republican?
02:51Absolutely not, sir.
02:52Is it a crime to write a check to Republicans?
02:55It is not.
02:56And I'm happy to explain why we issued these subpoenas, if you'd like.
03:01Sure.
03:02Briefly.
03:03We had to conduct an investigation about whether any person or entity violated the law with respect
03:10to the attempt to block the peaceful transfer of power.
03:13To make that decision.
03:14Yes, I understand.
03:15And you used that as an excuse to engage in a massive fishing expedition targeting over 400 Republicans.
03:21And it was disgraceful.
03:23Let's just talk about the United States Senate.
03:26You issued subpoenas for more than 20 percent of the Republicans in the Senate.
03:32Is that why you lied to the House under oath about getting member text messages?
03:37I answered every question I was asked truthfully.
03:41Oh, I don't think so.
03:42I'm proud of our investigation.
03:43No, well, you shouldn't be.
03:44You should be totally ashamed.
03:45Let me just ask you this.
03:47On December 17, 2025, you told the House that you had never gotten text messages from members of Congress.
03:55Let's have a look.
03:56Here's what you said to the House.
03:59Did you seek a search warrant for the content of any text messages of members?
04:04You say, from members?
04:07Yes.
04:08You say, I don't recall.
04:10I don't recall that.
04:11It was just toll records?
04:13You say, correct.
04:14Now, do you recall this exchange with the House on December 17, 2025?
04:19I see it there, yes.
04:20Okay, good.
04:22But on June the 2nd, 2023, two full years earlier, you demanded from the National Archives records that included text
04:31messages from 44 United States senators and members of Congress.
04:37And, indeed, you got all of those records.
04:40Isn't that correct?
04:41Yes, and I'm happy to explain that if you'll give me the opportunity.
04:44Oh, no, I understand that you got them.
04:45We all understand, and we know it, not because you told us, but because the Department of Justice disclosed it.
04:52So two full years before this deposition, you were in possession of text messages from 44 members of Congress that
05:00you went and subpoenaed.
05:01You read them within 30 minutes, the Department of Justice told this committee.
05:06They said that within an hour of receiving those text messages, your team was reading them, and yet, not only
05:13did you not notify any member of Congress whose text messages you obtained pursuant to your process,
05:20you told the House, two full years later, having read all 44 members' messages, you told them you'd never gotten
05:26messages.
05:27You'd never requested messages from any member of Congress.
05:31That was a lie, Mr. Smith.
05:34And you may try your lawyer your way out of it.
05:37Well, it wasn't from the member.
05:38It was from the archives.
05:40You knew exactly what you were being asked, and you deliberately misled them.
05:44You're a smart guy.
05:45I think that's pretty clear.
05:47But you use your ability and the powers of your office to lie to the court, to lie to Congress,
05:54to lie to the American people, to lie to the House.
05:58It's the worst abuse of prosecutorial power in the history of the United States.
06:03And all I have to say is, I'm glad you failed.
06:05I don't know what our democracy would be like if you had succeeded in your effort to interfere in the
06:12workings of a presidential election.
06:14If it were up to me, I'd charge you with perjury.
06:16But you should certainly be disbarred.
06:19And I can only pray that nothing like this will ever happen again in the United States of America.

Recommended