Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 4 minutes ago
One Opposition MP raised concerns about the proposed fines for children found guilty of certain offences under the bill for the increase in the age limit for alcohol, tobacco, cannabis and gambling .

However, a member of the Government said the Courts would not seek to have a child pay a $50,000 fine and could even give a reprimand and throw out the matter altogether.

Juhel Browne reports.
Transcript
00:00You can smoke a cigarette as a 19, 20 year old and you are telling me as soon as this
00:05comes into act, that person is now liable for a fine of $50,000. That does not add up Mr.
00:15Speaker.
00:15MP Hans De Beans was the first member of the opposition to contribute to the House of Representatives' debate of
00:22the bill meant to increase the age limit for the consumption of alcohol and tobacco from 18 to 21 years
00:28of age and the age limit for cannabis and gambling from 18 to 25 years of age.
00:34And we are united on the fact that alcohol abuse destroys lives. Gambling can devastate individuals and their families. Marijuana
00:45and drug dependency also destroys lives. And tobacco addiction can cause enormous harm. We are united on that. So this
00:56debate is not about whether we should protect our young people. We know we should.
01:01MP De Beans made reference to the Attorney General who piloted the bill.
01:06On the other side, the person that is moving this motion is the person that this least affects because they
01:13are not in the age group or even near to the age group that this is affecting. This is not
01:19something that is going to affect him and his livelihood. There are no consultations that have been done with those
01:27between the ages of 18 to 24.
01:30The young people who this affects do not have a voice in this legislation.
01:36MP De Beans highlighted some of the new penalties that are being proposed in the bill.
01:41Under the proposed amendment to Section 38 of the Children Act, a child over the age of 10 who is
01:48found in the specified circumstances involving alcohol, tobacco, cannabis or dangerous drugs can commit an offence carrying a fine of
01:57$50,000 on summary conviction.
02:01Mr. Speaker, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14-year-old, where are they getting $50,000 from?
02:08What we always need to remember is a child in these scenarios is a victim. A child is a victim
02:16and not a criminal.
02:18Defense Minister Wayne Sturge later responded to some of the concerns raised by the opposition.
02:23So they used their discretion and they started the lowest. So do you think the court is going to watch
02:28a 10-year-old and say, well, I'm going to fine you $50,000?
02:31It doesn't work. If you go to court, you see the courts do not do that.
02:38So if you are convicted and you don't have to be in this bill, the emphasis is not on conviction.
02:44If you are convicted, you can get even a reprimand and discharge, which means no conviction.
02:50But even before you reach there, right in this bill, there's a separation between those who should know better, the
02:57facilitators, and those who are the intended victims.
03:02Once the bill is passed by the lower house, it will go to the Senate.
03:07Jewel Brown, TV6 News.
Comments