00:00This is financial analyst,
00:02which is a testigo
00:03that is possible for impeachment trial
00:04by Vice President Sara Duterte.
00:06According to the Senate Impeachment Court,
00:08this is how it is
00:09to make evidence for Article 2
00:11or not to make a decision
00:14on the vice president.
00:15This is our report.
00:20After the testimony
00:21of Attorney Anne-Laurene Garcia Marquez
00:23from the Bureau of Internal Revenue,
00:25the financial analyst
00:28na si Atty. Alexander Cabrera.
00:30Sa pananaw ni dating
00:31Philippine Bar Association,
00:33President Atty. Rico Domingo,
00:35inihahanda ng testimony
00:36ni Atty. Marquez
00:37ang mga datos
00:38para sa susunod na testigo.
00:39They're laying the foundation
00:41para doon sa forensic auditor.
00:44At pinapakita nila,
00:46pinatahambing nila,
00:47anong bang declarations
00:48sa IPR
00:49ng respondent
00:50and the husband
00:52at binabanggan nila
00:54kung ano ang total
00:55na income.
00:56Makikita natin yun,
00:58sa conclusion nyan,
00:59eh,
01:00malaki ang disparity
01:03ng diniklear na income
01:05as opposed to
01:07the other incomes
01:08that are being produced
01:09and generated
01:10in this particular discussion.
01:12Nauna na ang sinabi
01:13ng Senate Impeachment Court
01:14na ihaharap
01:15bilang expert witness
01:16ng prosekusyon
01:17si Atty. Cabrera.
01:19Magsusumiti daw ito
01:20ng forensic reports
01:21na nagsasabing
01:22nakalikom umano
01:23ng unexplained wealth
01:24si na Vice President
01:25Sara Duterte
01:26at kanyang mister
01:27na si Atty. Mans Carpio.
01:29Mula raw ang report nito
01:30sa nakasalpina
01:31na bank, corporate
01:32at tax records.
01:34Layunin daw
01:34ng prosekusyon
01:35na maipakita rin
01:36may hindi umano
01:37na ideklarang yaman
01:38ang vicepresidente
01:39sa kanyang salen
01:40mula 2022
01:41hanggang 2025.
01:43Ano po ba yung sasabihin
01:44dapat ng forensic expert?
01:46Papakita niya yung trail?
01:48Tama po ba?
01:49Yes. Not only the trail
01:50but the underlying
01:53index nila yun eh.
01:54That's a very tedious
01:55process, Pia.
01:57The defense counsel
01:58if they're not satisfied
01:59with the expert witness
02:01and the testimony
02:02I'm sure they will
02:03try to demolish
02:05the finding
02:06of the expert witness.
02:07Sa apat na articles
02:08of impeachment
02:09tatlo na
02:10ang natalakay
02:11sa loob ng 36 na araw
02:12ng pagbilitis.
02:13Una,
02:14ang umano'y pagbabanta
02:15ni vicepresident Duterte
02:16sa Pangulo,
02:17first lady
02:18at dating house speaker.
02:20Ikalawa,
02:20ang mali umano'ng paggamit
02:22ng confidential funds.
02:23At ikatlo,
02:24ang hindi umano'ng
02:25maipaliwanag
02:26na yaman
02:26ng pangalawang Pangulo.
02:27We weigh ngayon
02:28ng senator judges yan.
02:30Ano bang
02:30mas mabigat
02:31at would that be sufficient?
02:34Would that be
02:35substantial evidence
02:36ang kanilang
02:37ang kanilang
02:38weight
02:39na inahanap?
02:41Wala namang
02:41standard ngayon
02:42kahit sa Amerika.
02:44Ang tinitingnan ngayon
02:46would be
02:46ang pansyensya
02:47ng mga senator judges.
02:49Napag-usapan din
02:50na huwag nang talakayan
02:51ng Article 3
02:51na tungkol naman
02:52sa bribery.
02:53Sa paliwanag
02:54ni Atty. Domingo,
02:55kung susundin ang impeachment court
02:56ang ginagawa
02:57sa maordinaryong korte,
02:58hindi pa agad
02:59magsisimula
02:59ang presentasyon
03:00ng depensa.
03:01Kailangan muna
03:02maghain
03:03ang formal offer
03:04of evidence
03:04at
03:04prosecution
03:05at pagkakomento
03:06rin dito
03:07ang depensa.
03:08Presiding officer
03:09and the senator judges
03:10will now rule
03:11on the admissibility
03:13of the evidence
03:14presented by the panel.
03:16Majority ngayon
03:16magkasabi
03:17kung admissible
03:18o hindi admissible yan.
