- 24分钟前
八点最热报 | 美国要把国防拨款提高至将近1.5万亿美元！这是美国史上单笔规模最大、金额最高的国防预算。国防部长赫格塞斯星期三在美国陆军协会年度会议上提出这项动议时指出，美国不能再用旧思维应付新威胁，并认为现在必须把资金投入真正能够改变未来战争的领域。（主播: 蔡心慧）
类别
🗞
新闻消息文字稿
00:00A reminder before watching the video
00:01Popular websites have more content
00:04Future Great Power Wars
00:05No longer just an aircraft carrier
00:07Instead, it's an AI weapon.
00:09In order to regain the so-called advantage in the AI war
00:12U.S. Defense Secretary Hexes
00:14An astonishing number was drawn.
00:16US 2027
00:17The defense budget is $1.5 trillion.
00:21He spoke very frankly.
00:23What about this money?
00:23Rebuilding the U.S. military to counter China
00:25Military modernization is of paramount importance
00:28It is a test of future wars
00:29Strategic bet
00:31US military analysis points out
00:33What you really need to worry about
00:34It's not about how many weapons China already possesses.
00:36But if we continue to follow
00:38If development continues at the current pace
00:40Will China be in the next generation of war?
00:43Gradually changing the balance of power between the US and China
00:47Harksace, Association of the United States Army
00:49Warning at the annual meeting
00:50Autonomous Operations
00:51Robots and AI are becoming
00:53The key to determining the outcome of future wars
00:56The leading side may run faster and faster.
00:58The lagging side may fall further and further behind.
01:01What about these words?
01:03This points out the core of the current round of US military expansion.
01:07In the past, military hegemony was measured by aircraft carriers.
01:09fighter jets, submarines, and missiles
01:11Today we'll see who has more drones.
01:15Whose AI makes decisions faster?
01:16Who can jam enemy electronic systems?
01:19Under the threat of missiles
01:20Continue to maintain combat capability
01:23Faced with the threat of China's continuous advancement in militarization
01:27The United States can no longer sit idly by and wait to be pressured.
01:29The United States must reveal its military hand.
01:32Fully prepare for China
01:34This is a huge gamble on US military spending.
01:36We must never allow China to lead the next war.
01:40Many military analyses have pointed out
01:41Future wars will not necessarily be about who possesses the most expensive weapons.
01:45Whoever has the last laugh will be the one who wins.
01:46If one side can mass-produce low-cost drones
01:50The other side, however, must constantly deploy expensive interceptor missiles to counter them.
01:54The cost structure of war may undergo a fundamental change.
01:59The US's $1.5 trillion budget is not just about building more advanced weapons.
02:04Instead, we strive to create a system capable of mass production.
02:06Rapidly deployable and continuously replenished combat system
02:10Hegess's push for an independent combat plan
02:13It is an important component of this system
02:16The United States needs to get unmanned systems to the front lines as quickly as possible.
02:20Allow the military to continuously improve based on feedback from real-world testing and deployment.
02:25Ultimately, what the United States wants to seize is not just technological superiority.
02:29Rather, it is the initiative in future wars.
02:34The United States plans to increase its defense spending to nearly $1.5 trillion.
02:38This is the largest single transaction in US history.
02:41The largest defense budget
02:43Defense Minister Hergész on Wednesday
02:45Presented at the Association of the United States Army Annual Meeting
02:48The most important point to the motion was that
02:49This is not simply about adding a few warships and fighter jets.
02:53Instead, the focus should be on addressing long-standing equipment maintenance issues.
02:56Rigid military spending structure
02:58And the dilemma of insufficient investment in new technologies
03:00Hegesses said without naming names
03:02The United States can no longer use old thinking to deal with new threats.
03:06And they believe that funds must be invested now.
03:09The areas that can truly change the future of warfare
03:29Hegesses did not name names directly.
03:32But so-called opponents of similar strength
03:34In the current international situation
03:36The direction is already quite clear.
03:38That is China
03:40Washington is worried
03:41China's military modernization
03:43It is undermining the US military's technological and operational superiority.
03:46Compared to the enormous numbers
03:48What deserves more attention is
03:50The funds went to drones.
03:52robot
03:53Space systems and artificial intelligence
03:55If one party can produce drones in large quantities at low cost
03:58The other side, however, has to use expensive interceptor weapons to deal with it.
04:02The speed and cost consumed by both parties
04:04There may be a huge gap.
04:06Create greater competitive pressure
04:08This is the real thing.
04:10You added a step of change.
04:12In automation
04:13In space
04:13In space
04:14In intelligence
04:15In intelligence
04:16In intelligence
04:16In intelligence
04:16In intelligence
04:16In intelligence
04:17In intelligence
04:19In intelligence
04:19In intelligence
04:21In intelligence
04:21In intelligence
04:23In intelligence
04:24In intelligence
04:56The advantage in future warfare will not be how expensive the weapons are.
04:57and intelligence
04:59Blaming the previous Biden administration
05:24This is not just a very clear political attack.
05:27Furthermore, the Trump administration sought to portray itself as a driver of military reform.
05:31The ultimate goal of this high-stakes military gamble is ultimately the Indo-Pacific region.
05:36Balance of power in the district
05:38The Center for Strategic and International Studies in the United States once published an analysis pointing out that...
05:42China in the Taiwan Strait
05:43South China Sea
05:44Japan surroundings
05:45Military activities such as
05:46Overall increase
05:47In order to maintain America's absolute deterrent power in the Indo-Pacific
05:51The US military adapted rapidly.
05:53Rapid R&D
05:54Mass production and iteration
05:56It has become a strategic asset that the Trump administration cannot easily give up.
06:12This $1.5 trillion frenzy
06:15Is it a panacea?
06:16It still needs to be questioned.
06:17The United States still needs to address its budget.
06:20Whether it will receive full approval from Congress
06:22Can military production keep up?
06:24Real-world issues such as whether advanced weapons can be delivered on time
06:29Spending more money doesn't automatically increase combat power.
06:32If military spending is affected by inefficient procurement and political infighting
06:36This military reconstruction could also fall apart at the last minute.
06:40Therefore, the United States must truly translate its budget into deployable combat power.
06:45At the same time, establish a more effective collaborative defense system with allies.
06:49For Malaysia and Southeast Asian countries
06:52This US-China competition is no longer a distant political news story.
06:56Once regional security deteriorates
06:58Trade, investment, supply chains, and maritime transport could all be impacted.
07:03Southeast Asia does not need a new arms race
07:06We do not want to become a battlefield for great power conflicts.
07:09However, maintaining peace cannot rely solely on prayer.
07:13True and reliable peace must be built on clear rules.
07:17Credible deterrence
07:18And no single party can easily monopolize regional security.
07:24The United States has proposed a defense budget of $1.5 trillion.
07:27The signal released is already very clear.
07:29Washington is unwilling to relinquish its military advantage in the Indo-Pacific.
07:33They are even less willing to compete in the next round of competition between drone AI and autonomous combat.
07:38behind
07:38Instead, they blatantly handed over the right to dominate the war to China.
07:43What's next?
07:44The real deciding factor isn't just whether the money will pass Congress.
07:48The real question is whether the United States can turn money into power.
07:52Turn strength into deterrence
07:54$1.5 trillion can't buy absolute security.
07:57But the real contest in the future
07:59It's not about who starts the war first.
08:02But who can make their opponent understand?
08:04The cost to animals far outweighs the potential benefits.
08:08The cost to animals is far greater