Skip to playerSkip to main content
Democratic Representative Ritchie Torres challenges Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent over what he portrays as the Trump administration’s tendency to blame former President Joe Biden. In a pointed exchange, Torres raises the question of whether blaming Biden has become a standard response to the administration’s challenges.


#RitchieTorres #ScottBessent #BlameBiden #DonaldTrump #JoeBiden #TrumpAdministration #USPolitics #CongressionalHearing #PoliticalClash #PoliticalNews

~HT.178~ED.103~GR.508~VG.HM~

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Like when in doubt, bling Joe Biden, is that the modus operandi of this administration?
00:03Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Secretary, are you familiar with the facts of the hugging face hack?
00:08I am. So I want to wonder the facts as I understand them. A swarm of open AI agents
00:13secretly communicated and coordinated for about two months without open AI fully realizing what
00:19was happening. Specifically from July 8th to July 13th, roughly 1,200 AI agents exchanged more than
00:2670,000 messages and files through an unauthorized message board. Again, without open AI recognizing
00:32the scale of what was happening. The AI swarm managed to escape its sandboxes, gain access to
00:38the public internet, and ultimately hack into the private infrastructure of hugging face.
00:43Of the 1,200 AI agents involved in the hugging face hack or in the lead up to it, do
00:50you know how
00:50many of them blew the whistle and alerted human researchers that an AI swarm had escaped the
00:56air sandboxes and hacked into a private company? My understanding is zero. The answer is zero.
01:01So of the 1,200 agents in the AI swarm, not a single one blew the whistle. Does that concern
01:07you?
01:08Well, I think we would have to understand what each agent was doing. And they...
01:14But does it concern out of 1,200, not a single one blew the whistle? Does that concern you?
01:18Well, again, the representative, exactly what is an agent? It is not a human. That it can be a very
01:27limited... It could be a very limited program that... Or it could have been tasked with something...
01:33But a program that escaped its sandbox and hacked into a private company. Is it fair to say
01:38that the hugging face incident illustrates how a misaligned or misused AI might find and exploit
01:46vulnerabilities in the very computer systems that operate our critical infrastructure, including
01:50our financial system? I agree. And that I think we have to... Again, we haven't seen where was the
01:59liability for that incident. Well, given that agreement, do you... Does the administration
02:04support any new AI safety regulation in light of the lessons learned from the hugging face
02:11hack? We have been working with the labs, with our financial partners on that. And you wouldn't
02:19notice... Is there any specific law regulation that you would support in light of the hugging face
02:23hack? I haven't seen anything yet. Okay. The leaders of the frontier AI labs,
02:29particularly OpenAI and Anthropic, have been effectively disclosing to the public that their
02:34increasingly powerful AI models could pose an existential risk to humanity. If a company
02:40is publicly disclosing that its own product could pose an existential risk to humanity, should
02:46that company be permitted to access the public capital markets through an IPO? I think the liabilities
02:53have to be very well outlined in the S-1 and in the prospectus. And as a former investor, now
03:02in the
03:02public sector, I'm not sure how one would quantify that. I want to move on to the economy. On August
03:084th,
03:09during an interview on CNBC Squawk Box, you said the following, quote, I got sick of hearing about this
03:13K-shaped economy. I can say here definitively, the K-shaped economy is over. Then on August 6th,
03:21you wrote on X, quote, earnings growth for mainstream workers at the 25th earnings percentile
03:26was 5.5% year over year in the latest data this quarter. You cite wage growth of 5.5%.
03:34Is that
03:34inflation adjusted? That's nominal. It's nominal. Okay. So the average CPI inflation rate in the second
03:42quarter of 2026 was 3.9%. So once you adjust the 5.5% nominal wage growth for 3.9
03:51% inflation,
03:52you're left with a real wage growth of only about 1.5%, a fact that you neglected to mention in
03:59your
03:59post. Also left unmentioned is the fact that lower-income households depend disproportionately
04:04on wages, while higher-income households own a disproportionate share of financial assets.
04:09From mid-January 2025 to mid-September 2026, real wages rose cumulatively by 0.5%. Over the same
04:19period of time, the S&P 500 rose cumulatively by over 20% in real terms. So Mr. Secretary, how
04:26can you
04:27possibly declare that the K-shaped economy is over when during President Trump's second term, the assets
04:33of Wall Street are booming, while the real wages of Main Street have barely grown? Well, it's the
04:39opposite of President Biden's term, because there was... No, no, let me finish. Can I ask, what's the
04:45statute of limitations on the Joe Biden blame game? Because we're approaching the two-year mark of
04:51the Trump administration. I was in a car accident as a teenager. My back still hurts. Did Joe Biden wage
04:56the
04:56war in Iran? Did he disrupt the Strait of Hormuz? Did he shut down one-fifth of the world's oil
05:01supply and LNG exports?
05:03Like, when in doubt, blame Joe Biden? Is that the modus operandi of this administration? I yield back.

Recommended