Skip to playerSkip to main content
The Government has banned public servants from using the navigation app Waze, citing concerns that the app's Israeli legal jurisdiction and the potential exposure of sensitive location data. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has also raised the possibility of a nationwide ban, and has encouraged Malaysians to switch to alternative navigation apps. Waze, however, has rejected allegations that it collects sensitive government information or that it allows users’ personal data to be exploited. What are the potential security risks and policy implications of this directive? On this episode of #Consider This Melisa Idris speaks with CF Fong, Managing Director of the cybersecurity consultancy, LGMS Berhad.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:09Hi, welcome back to Consider This. I'm Melissa Idris. Let's continue our discussion about the
00:15government's recent directive banning civil servants from using the navigation app Waze
00:21with Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim now considering whether or not the restriction should be extended
00:26to the wider public. So this is after concerns over the app's Israeli legal jurisdiction and its
00:34potential exposure of sensitive location data which Waze has denied. Now joining me on the show
00:40I have Sia Fong who is the Managing Director of the Cybersecurity Consultancy LGMS Berhad. Thank you
00:47so much for joining me Fong on the show. Let's start with the basics for many of us who aren't
00:51tech savvy. When we use a navigation app or any navigation app, what information is being
01:00collected? What can that information reveal about the user and our location? Primarily when you use
01:09a navigation app, of course the app itself will require your GPS location and sometimes the app
01:15will ask for your network permission to read your network. And these are the primary privileges
01:22that the app will require. But some apps may also ask you for your access to your contact list,
01:28to your phone, microphone or camera. These are all optionals but the primary mandatory required
01:34privileges for an app is the GPS location and it has the ability to read your GPS signals and even
01:43the
01:43network signals. Okay so so could a navigation app then expose what what the government is concerned
01:50about? Sensitive government information? Yes of course because the app has the privilege to read
01:56any user's location data and if you know the the app's owner, that means the the principal who created the
02:05app wants to do any analysis on the collected GPS data, of course they can. Okay all right so talk
02:12to me a
02:12little bit about the where Waze is incorporated. The government has expressed concern that Waze Mobile
02:19Limited is incorporated in Israel is subject to Israeli law from a cyber security perspective. Is there a
02:27technically credible basis for the claim that data from an app can be accessed by a foreign government?
02:37There were histories where there were cases you know where a foreign government is buying
02:43crowdsourced GPS location data from private organizations and this has proven in the US before.
02:51It's just that for Waze in particular we haven't noticed any news that where you know the
02:57the Israeli administration or any government officials are buying or selling this intelligence to anyone else but
03:03strictly coming from cyber security standpoint disregarding any geopolitical tension or anything
03:09like that but from cyber security standpoint any companies that produce an app obviously they will
03:16have the ability to collect data they will have to be the ability to analyze the data and then they
03:21also
03:22have a decision to whether or not they want to sell the accumulated data to any third party or not.
03:27Now Waze is
03:28not unique because any mapping apps any navigation apps will have similar features like Google Maps,
03:35Apple Maps or what for whatever reasons or whatever other countries they also may have their own
03:40navigation app like for example in China there's a GMAP and and all of them will have the ability to
03:47collect uh users data anyway all right so Waze is not uh not isolate not a unique isolated case okay
03:54all right so so
03:55talk to me about um this directive and what you make of it do you think that banning um Waze
04:03would be an
04:04effective security measure to address some of the government's concerns if the government's concern is
04:09exposure of location data would then restricting Waze only on government issued devices or government
04:16workers would that be sufficient uh what are your thoughts well from cyber security standpoint right just
04:23purely from cyber security standpoint without looking at any uh political agenda but banning an app is
04:29not the it's not able to solve the entire root cause you see today we have many apps that develop
04:35by
04:35multiple different nationals uh and we have ways from Israelis we we there are even more concerns about
04:42what's that what about what's that what's that is also uh similar and what about instagram social media
04:47platforms like facebook instagrams may have some kind of connections back to israel but
04:53are we what are we doing about it so i think the government has a genuine concern which is uh
04:58which
04:58is okay i think it's coming from um uh political concern but then again i think from a more long
05:05-term
05:05perspective we would i would suggest we may even have a better framework better guidelines for our
05:12government officials like what are the do's and don'ts what are the uh uh acceptable use uh in terms of
05:20applications on their personal devices i think having a long-term guidelines and framework would
05:26be better than just having a strict ban immediate strict ban on certain applications okay can you can
05:32you elaborate for me what kind of things would go into this guideline or the framework well at least
05:37the framework would specify you know what are the uh requirements requirements for government
05:42officials when they install any apps into into their personal devices are what are the do and
05:48do's and don'ts now what are the restrictions what are the considerations they should consider
05:52before even installing uh what are the restrictions of uh the privileges now that they can assign to an
05:58app so having a clear guidelines right then that will be better ensure that we are uh we have a
06:05better
06:05management than uh and instead of having a strict ban now looking at this case right having a strict
06:11ban on waste obviously it's going to trigger more questions like instead of using waste now what else can
06:18we use and and when we are banning waste should we even ban the entire android phone ecosystem because
06:25that is also coming from the us are we allowing us to spy on us or should we even ban
06:31ios apple because
06:32do we want a private a public company in the us to be able to read our activities and all
06:38that so it
06:39triggers far more many questions that's why i think if the i mean the concerns are genuine right the
06:45concerns from the government are genuine it's just that um i would say from a root cause perspective
06:53we might as well just have a better framework policies guidelines for the government officials
06:58and that will serve as a much better guide guidance well this this directive has really um triggered a
07:05conversation around uh digital sovereignty and i wanted to ask you about that phone um how we think about
07:13digital sovereignty in a world where tech is so interconnected tech is a global game
07:19um and what does that mean even locally developed act uh might not necessarily be more secure than a
07:27foreign application how do we think about that yeah this is very true because we are now living in a
07:32global village right so everything is interconnected we are using technologies from all over the world and
07:38aside from just exporter i mean aside from just importer we also exported so we we need to i mean
07:45we need to
07:45adapt to the mindset that now everything is globalized right so um obviously we still have things that we
07:52want to protect right so that's why i say it's still come back come back to the root cause do
07:57we have a
07:57policies or guidelines of um guidance guidance policy guidance to guide our government officials of how to
08:05protect our personal data but it's kind of inevitable because today as long as they were using a
08:11smartphone right our data is on it's it's with the u.s government right they they if they wanted to
08:17access this data they can if they wanted to right obviously the the only thing stand between the government
08:25and our data is the organization that's collecting it right now for example apple google and some of these
08:32largest giants in the world um so that's why this is uh this is going to be a complex issue
08:38when it
08:38comes to politics but from a cyber security standpoint data sovereignty is always a concern so we the the
08:45best advice i mean for someone uh to who are concerned about the personal data is that you only share
08:51what
08:51you would like to share because whatever you have shared it it will it will be always on the internet
08:57it
08:58will be always available and um that's why this is the uh the thing that i would advise from actually
09:04can i while i have you can i ask you for your advice for for the people who are so
09:09not just um i guess
09:10the people the audience watching at home who are concerned about um how data is being used but if you
09:16were also advising um this kind of of the policymakers to think about how cyber security risks are um should
09:25be
09:25mitigated from per from official devices but also from personal usage what are the things that really
09:32need to be um think thought about because i from what you were saying it's not just the types of
09:38data
09:38but it's the permissions that we give it's where the data is stored what what uh the data retention
09:43policies i'm also thinking about um how what would you prioritize if we were thinking more strategically
09:50about cyber security i'll split into short term and medium and long term so from short term perspective
09:56right i would encourage all the uh i mean i would encourage the government to draft our guidelines
10:01the usability guidelines like uh like what what are the do's and don'ts right and from a longer term
10:07perspective um our administration or our government should even encourage local talent development local
10:13uh products development now i use a very extreme case in another country for example china in china you
10:20cannot use facebook you cannot use twitter you cannot use any other applications that origin from
10:25the us but then again domestically they have encouraged the ability to develop something similar
10:31now that is not something you can build overnight right it takes it takes time it takes time to
10:35build it takes time to cultivate and and where um that's why this is a long-term game if a
10:41country
10:42really want to protect the sovereignty of the data right and you look at china china has done it and
10:47it's not
10:48easy and it is plausible it's not easy but um that is the extreme example of how you protect your
10:56entire country's sovereign data data sovereignty yeah it's definitely a long game fong thank you so
11:02much for joining me on the show i appreciate you sharing your insights with us cf fong managing director
11:06of lgms brahada cyber security consultancy wrapping up this episode of consider this i'm melissa idris
11:12signing off for the evening thank you so much for watching and good night
11:17you

Recommended