Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 1 minute ago
Two receipts, two different stories, and one signature nobody can agree on! On Hot Bench, a dispute over the sale of a 2000 Dodge Charger takes an unexpected turn when Nicole Lindsay reveals she wrote two separate receipts on the same day.

One receipt involves a $5,000 cash refund, while the other states that $3,000 is non-refundable. But when Judge Michael Corriero examines the conflicting paperwork, the defendant drops a bombshell: "That's not my signature. I've never seen this receipt." Suddenly, the question isn't just about the money—it's about which document can be trusted.

Watch this classic Hot Bench clip as Judge Corriero tries to make sense of two receipts and one very suspicious signature.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:00The first signature, is that your signature?
00:03It doesn't look like my signature.
00:04Doesn't it say Robert?
00:06Yes, it does.
00:07But that doesn't look like my signature at all.
00:09So you're saying that this is a forgery?
00:10That's what I'm saying.
00:11Did you give us the receipt?
00:12I didn't give you this receipt.
00:13My receipt...
00:14Let's see your exhibit.
00:16Exhibit B, the first page, the receipt with the...
00:20Here, it says, on August 23rd, I, Nicole Lindsay,
00:25refunded Bobby $5,000 cash for the $2,000 Dodge Charger.
00:30And whose signature is that?
00:31Hers.
00:32That's mine.
00:33This is the one I had given him.
00:35Wait a minute.
00:36Are you saying that you gave the defendant two receipts on August 23rd?
00:42No.
00:43Well, yes, I guess there was two receipts,
00:45one for him to keep and one for me,
00:46rather than making a photocopy.
00:48I just wrote out two of them.
00:49Well, which one did you keep?
00:51The one with the two signatures.
00:52That's not my signature.
00:53Did you sign our complaint?
00:56I've never seen this receipt.
00:57One second.

Recommended