00:00In this case, we had a notice that the desert flower, which we had 2nd November, which we had started
00:08in kindergarten classes, that we had to halt the activities.
00:16And the basis that we had two things, one that we had approved, and the other one that was subjudice.
00:25So, these two things are so baseless, which I want to prove to you with papers and thoughts.
00:36In this case, we are going to land.
00:39Last year, you will remember that in August, there was a notice in D.C. office,
00:44that the land, which is the lease signed.
00:48It was 8 years ago, so the government should give it back.
00:51And we had beyond doubt, we had proof that we had 5 chitias,
00:58and there were 10 office and 50 phone calls for the lease deed.
01:04So, this is the lease deed, which was not ready for the lease deed, which was not ready for the
01:12lease deed.
01:34And on that basis, all of our funders, donors, and government companies, PSUs have funded us, and our construction started.
01:45And we had promised that the lease deed in the lease deed, which was only 1,500,000 square feet,
01:51passive solar-heated construction, which was already done in the land.
01:56Then, when the lease deed was released in March, we had promised that the lease of the lease,
02:00that the land and the other issues will be resolved.
02:03But, when the lease deed was not resolved in September,
02:08we had proposed this in the High Court of Jammu.
02:11And, as per the order,
02:15on the 11th September, High Court Jammu had this order,
02:20and the respondents, which is from the U.T. administration,
02:24they said that they were late,
02:26because of the petitioner,
02:29which is a mistake,
02:30they were remembering them,
02:33and they didn't have the lease deed to sign.
02:36So, they had written the order,
02:40that the respondents, which is the U.T. government,
02:43they couldn't create third-party rights,
02:45that they couldn't create land.
02:47So, the activities that they were not going,
02:50they would do that,
02:51they would do that,
02:52until the case is not going to be disposed.
02:55And the Desert Flower School,
02:57this construction was in 2023,
03:01and this was also a public sector undertaking,
03:04which is a government organization,
03:07which has completed all due diligence,
03:09and completed compliance,
03:12and they had funded it.
03:14And this school,
03:15the last year,
03:16was ready for the school,
03:18and it was going to start,
03:19but unfortunately,
03:21the last year,
03:23we didn't start last year,
03:27so,
03:28we started in November,
03:30and we started in November 2,
03:32in November 2,
03:35so,
03:37as far as land is concerned,
03:39which is in their notice,
03:40this is completely irrelevant,
03:42because matter is sub-judice,
03:43you can't do anything,
03:45but the opposite truth is,
03:46that the government,
03:47the court has said,
03:49the government,
03:50which is the respondents,
03:50we are the petitioners,
03:52the court has said,
03:53that you can't touch that land,
03:55you can't do anything,
03:56you can't do anything,
03:57you can't do anything,
04:01you can't do anything,
04:29you can't do anything,
04:33you can do anything,
04:34you can't do anything,
05:32you can't do anything,
06:03you can't do anything,
06:07you can't do anything,
06:33you can't do anything,
06:34you can do anything,
06:36you can't do anything,
06:49you can't do anything,
06:49you can't do anything,
