Skip to playerSkip to main content
euronews (عــربي)
  • 3 minutes ago
برنامج يوروب توداي يناقش احتمال ضربات أمريكية على إيران ومحادثات أوكرانيا في أبوظبي

بعد انتهاء انتخابات منتصف الولاية، يتجه الاهتمام إلى خطوة دونالد ترامب التالية بشأن إيران، بينما يحذر مسؤولون أمريكيون حلفاء الخليج من الاستعداد لهجمات جديدة. وتتجه محادثات أوكرانيا إلى أبوظبي الأسبوع المقبل. كما تُثار تهديدات بوجود قنابل على رحلات أوروبية وكتاب عن إيمانويل ماكرون.

لمزيد من القراءة : http://arabic.euronews.com/2026/11/06/europe-today-trump-considers-strikes-on-iran-as-ukraine-talks-move-to-abu-dhabi

سجل: يورونيوز متوفرة باثنا عشرة لغة

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00موسيقى
00:07موسيقى
00:15موسيقى
00:16موسيقى
00:17نومي بيشة
00:20موسيقى
00:20أشترك
00:22موسيقى
00:22أعلى
00:23موسيقى
00:28موسيقى
00:29موسيقى
00:31موسيقى
00:31موسيقى
00:32موسيقى
00:33قبل الوضع حادث اشخاص الأربع بإران بعد إيواغ الدراج كيلو نبال مد Linus
00:37ترغب بإنستمت المؤكسين الآن من تلعين الماء العربية
00:45القرابة الشارع التي لديه المنزل إزراني في أجراء تربية
00:49والمعنى الآن في البقاء المكتبين الآن المتنقل في الإنقاء
00:51الدراجس الساعة المؤكسين للمغاية العربية
00:57المترجم للقناة
01:51المترجم للقناة
01:58المترجم للقناة
02:04المترجم للقناة
02:07المترجم للقناة
02:11المترجم للقناة
02:31المترجم للقناة
02:34المترجم للقناة
02:38المترجم للقناة
02:45المترجم للقناة
02:48المترجم للقناة
02:50المترجم للقناة
02:54المترجم للقناة
02:56المترجم للقناة
02:57المترجم للقناة
03:02المترجم للقناة
03:04المترجم للقناة
03:06المترجم للقناة
03:20المترجم للقناة
03:23المترجم للقناة
03:24المترجم للقناة
03:27المترجم للقناة
03:38المترجم للقناة
03:41المترجم للقناة
03:42المترجم للقناة
03:44المترجم للقناة
03:45المترجم للقناة
03:47المترجم للقناة
03:47المترجم للقناة
03:48المترجم للقناة
04:05المترجم للقناة
04:07موضوع بموضوع
04:37المترجم للقناة
05:07who is in Helsinki.
05:09Good morning, Shona.
05:10Well, good morning, Stefan.
05:12Yes, indeed, those talks have concluded
05:13for two days with officials from NATO,
05:15the European Commission and the World Bank.
05:17Now it's all eyes on Abu Dhabi next week,
05:20where you'll have higher working level
05:21meetings with Russia, Ukraine
05:23and the United States,
05:24convened by the US envoy, Steve Witkoff.
05:27What I've heard, the best sort of hope for this
05:29is that there may be another prisoner swap
05:31and potentially a ceasefire.
05:32But we don't know if that's confirmed
05:34because we don't know what Vladimir Putin,
05:35the Russian president,
05:36is willing to agree to.
05:38Coming from here in Helsinki,
05:40officials are saying that the message
05:42needs to be impressed on Putin
05:43that Europe will never abandon Ukraine
05:45and for him to continue the war is fruitless.
05:48Now, above all, the urgent need for Ukraine
05:51to receive Patriot interceptor missiles,
05:53that is also very important.
05:56NATO sources have told me
05:58that there's a message coming
05:59from the Supreme Allied Commander
06:01that countries that have interceptors
06:03need to give them to Ukraine,
06:04but they're only willing to do so
06:06if they can guarantee
06:07reprenishment from the US.
06:09That is not forthcoming yet.
06:11But I caught up with Antti Hakkinen,
06:12the Finnish defense minister,
06:14and I asked him about this situation
06:15and what should be done.
06:18The winter is coming
06:19and Russia is preparing
06:22huge attacks
06:22to Ukraine's
06:25civil infrastructure,
06:26energy infrastructure.
06:27and now is the most critical time
06:29to have all the air defense capabilities
06:33for Ukraine,
06:34what we can arrange.
06:35We have the funding.
06:37We have the funding.
06:38Now we need the stocks
06:40to be delivered to Ukraine.
06:43And there's also some other countries
06:45globally which can support.
06:47But we need the political willingness
06:49also from the US side
06:50to start the deliveries.
06:52Europeans have gave the funding for that.
06:55and now it's only a matter
06:57of kind of political arrangements.
07:00Europeans are now
07:00the biggest supporter of Ukraine
07:02and we are giving the EU loan
07:04strong bilateral support.
07:06So we are quite big players
07:08in that field.
07:10But still we have to show
07:12more strength,
07:13more willingness in long term
07:15to support Ukraine.
07:17Because if there comes
07:19some political messages
07:21that Europe is exhausted
07:23or something like that,
07:24that's a wrong message
07:25that weakens our negotiation position.
07:29When we are messaging
07:30that how we are supporting Ukraine
07:32in long term first
07:33and the sanctions also,
07:34we have to show
07:36willingness in long term
07:38to be tough on these positions.
07:41Just final question.
07:42You said that
07:42there was a serious threat
07:44still looming from Russia
07:46across Europe.
07:47Can you describe that
07:48given where we are geographically?
07:49Well, Russia is ramping up
07:51their military in all domains
07:52from traditional conventional warfare
07:55and also nuclear capabilities
07:57and they are building
07:57new infrastructure,
07:59increasing their manpower,
08:01building new infrastructure,
08:03not just in our vicinity,
08:06but also wider area.
08:08So they can pose
08:10a military threat,
08:11not direct at this point,
08:13but in future
08:14we have to be prepared
08:15for that kind of scenarios.
08:17We hope that there will be
08:19a peace and peaceful solutions
08:21in everything,
08:21but Europeans have to ramp up
08:23their defense and fast
08:25and also counter
08:26these hybrid threats
08:27much more efficiently
08:28and united.
08:32Finnish Defense Minister
08:33Antti Heckenen
08:35speaking to Shona Murray
08:36in Helsinki.
08:37In the United States,
08:39the midterm elections
08:39were not only a referendum
08:41on Donald Trump.
08:42They could also prove
08:43to be a defining moment
08:44for the Democratic Party,
08:46forcing it to confront
08:47some difficult questions
08:48about its leadership,
08:50its identity
08:51and its strategy
08:52for the future.
08:53Who speaks for the Democrats?
08:55And can the party
08:56turn electoral gains
08:57into a coherent
08:58political alternative?
09:00And what lessons
09:01will it draw
09:01as it looks ahead to 2028?
09:04Earlier I discussed this
09:05with Bruce Stokes,
09:06associate fellow
09:07at Chatham House,
09:08senior fellow
09:09at the German Marshall Fund
09:10and a member of the Council
09:11on Foreign Relations.
09:12Here's what he said.
09:14There was an American comedian
09:16in the 1930s
09:18named Will Rogers
09:19and he was once asked
09:20what political party
09:21he belonged to
09:22and he said,
09:24I don't belong
09:24to an organized political party,
09:26I'm a Democrat.
09:27and there will be,
09:29as you suggested,
09:30tensions between
09:31the progressive wing
09:32of the party
09:33and the moderate wing
09:34of the party
09:34going forward
09:35in terms of priorities.
09:38I think realistically,
09:41it would appear now
09:42there might be
09:43maybe eight
09:44or more,
09:46nine,
09:46maybe ten
09:47Democratic Socialists
09:48in the Democratic Caucus
09:50of now 240,
09:53250 people.
09:54so they'll be very vocal.
09:58They'll claim
09:58the election
09:59is an endorsement
10:01of their agenda
10:02but I think
10:04the reality
10:05is that
10:07the Democrats
10:08and the more
10:08moderate Democrats
10:09are really the ones
10:10who prevailed.
10:11So Democrats
10:12succeeded largely
10:13on the message
10:14of being against Trump
10:15but going forward
10:16they're going to have
10:17to decide
10:17what they want
10:18to stand for
10:19when he won't be
10:20on the ballot.
10:22Your take.
10:22I think you're right.
10:24You know,
10:24we have a long saying
10:26in the United States
10:27about it's the economy
10:28stupid
10:29and clearly
10:29the exit polling data
10:31showed that people
10:32thought the economy
10:33was the principal issue
10:34but in this case
10:35it was also Trump stupid
10:36that people
10:37by three to one
10:39said that they
10:41had voted
10:41against Trump
10:43in this election.
10:45So the question
10:46is going to be
10:47what do
10:48the Democrats
10:49stand for
10:50going into
10:50the 2028 election?
10:52how do the various
10:53contenders
10:53position themselves
10:56because they can't
10:57just continue
10:58to talk about Trump
10:59because as you say
11:03constitutionally
11:03the president
11:04can't run again.
11:05So it's going
11:06to be a question
11:07of what are we
11:07going to do
11:09to win the voters
11:10support in 2028
11:12when we don't
11:13have Trump
11:13to beat up.
11:14Well even with
11:15this week's
11:16big victories
11:17Democrats are going
11:17to be limited
11:18in what they can do
11:19with their new
11:20congressional
11:20majorities
11:21because Trump
11:22can veto
11:23everything.
11:24How do you
11:25see this
11:25divided government
11:26play out?
11:28Well it would
11:29be very interesting
11:30to see whether
11:30the Democrats
11:31can fashion
11:32some initial
11:33legislation
11:34that addresses
11:35the cost of
11:36health care
11:37for example
11:38or food stamps
11:40which yes
11:41it is true
11:42that in the
11:43Senate
11:43they would
11:44need 60 votes
11:45because otherwise
11:47you can block
11:47things in the
11:48Senate if you
11:49don't have 60
11:49votes but it
11:50puts at least
11:51some Republicans
11:52who are up
11:53for re-election
11:53in 2028
11:54in a bit
11:55of a bind.
11:56Do they want
11:57to vote
11:57against the
11:58food stamps?
11:59Do they want
12:00to vote
12:00against Medicaid
12:01which is our
12:02health care
12:03for poor
12:03people?
12:04Do they want
12:05to vote
12:05against subsidies
12:07for Obamacare
12:08which have
12:09gone up
12:09dramatically?
12:10On that note
12:11I know it's
12:12early but
12:13who do you
12:14see as the
12:15candidate leading
12:16the Democrats
12:17into the next
12:18presidential election?
12:20So it's very
12:21early at this
12:22point but you're
12:23right there's
12:23going to be
12:24more than a
12:25half a dozen
12:25maybe even
12:2610 people
12:27are going to
12:28throw their
12:28hats in the
12:28rings in the
12:29next couple
12:29of weeks.
12:30I think the
12:31clear winner
12:32from this
12:33election in
12:33terms of
12:34raising his
12:34profile and
12:35exciting people
12:36is John
12:37Ossoff who
12:38is the
12:39senator from
12:40Georgia who
12:41won by 18
12:42or 19
12:42percentage points
12:43and is
12:45young
12:45he's articulate
12:47he's from
12:48the south
12:49and I think
12:50the initial
12:52excitement is
12:53going to be
12:53about here.
12:56Political
12:57analyst Bruce
12:58Stokes speaking
12:59to us from
12:59Boston.
13:00A wave of
13:01bomb threats
13:02targeting
13:02commercial
13:03airliners is
13:04raising alarm
13:05across European
13:05aviation.
13:06Flights have
13:07been diverted
13:08emergency
13:09procedures
13:09activated and
13:11fighter jets
13:11scrambled in
13:12some cases
13:13based on
13:14threats that
13:14ultimately
13:15proved
13:15to be
13:16false.
13:16But who
13:17is behind
13:17this
13:18apparent
13:18campaign and
13:19are we
13:19witnessing a
13:20new form of
13:21hybrid warfare
13:22designed to
13:23disrupt European
13:24air travel and
13:25undermine public
13:26confidence?
13:27To assess the
13:28scale of the
13:29threat and the
13:29vulnerabilities it
13:30exposes I'm
13:31now joined by
13:32aviation expert and
13:33travel journalist
13:34Owen Corey in
13:35Dublin.
13:36Good morning to
13:36you.
13:38Good morning
13:39Stefan.
13:39So what
13:40happens
13:41operationally
13:42when an
13:42aircraft receives
13:44a bomb threat?
13:45What procedures
13:45are immediately
13:46triggered?
13:48I think
13:49you've already
13:50that is part of
13:51the problem
13:52Stefan.
13:52We have over
13:53500 civil
13:54airports in
13:55Europe.
13:56Usually a
13:57bomb threat
13:58comes to the
13:59airport, less
13:59so to the
14:00airline, and
14:01each airport is
14:02activating it
14:03using a separate
14:04set of
14:04protocols.
14:05The protocols
14:06aren't that
14:07scattered.
14:08It tends to be
14:09escalated to the
14:10local police
14:11force.
14:11and from
14:12there, very
14:13often to the
14:14state military
14:15intelligence or
14:16the military
14:16agencies.
14:18What we've
14:18seen on
14:20Tuesday and
14:20again yesterday
14:21when we had
14:22over 20
14:23flights affected,
14:24some very
14:25dramatically,
14:26others less
14:26so, is
14:27different airports
14:28reacting to
14:29what seems to
14:30be a blanket
14:31set of
14:32threats, almost
14:32weaponising
14:34disruption,
14:35because this
14:36is designed to
14:37disrupt.
14:38This is not
14:38designed to blow
14:39up anything.
14:39if you're
14:40going to blow
14:40up anything,
14:41you're not
14:41going to put
14:42every airport
14:42in Europe
14:43on the
14:43highest state
14:44of alert.
14:45And some
14:45airports,
14:46Stefan, seem
14:47to be jumpier
14:47than others
14:48when these
14:48threats come
14:49in.
14:49Owen, are
14:50airlines and
14:51airports sufficiently
14:52equipped to
14:53deal with a
14:53sustained campaign
14:54of false
14:55bomb threats?
14:57This is really
14:59weaponising the
15:00threat of a
15:01bomb, because
15:02you've got to
15:02remember how
15:03safe a European
15:05airspace is.
15:06For 40 years,
15:08nobody has got a
15:08bomb on board
15:09in aircraft, you
15:10have to go back
15:11to Lockerbie
15:11before you see
15:13anything like this
15:14happening.
15:15Airports have
15:15been very, very,
15:17very good at
15:17security, and all
15:19the viewers will
15:20know exactly what
15:21it takes to get
15:21through airport
15:22security.
15:23Nobody really has a
15:24chance of getting
15:25a bomb on board,
15:26but what they've
15:27discovered is they
15:28can weaponise the
15:29threat of a bomb
15:30to disrupt.
15:31What we need now
15:32is a strategy
15:33that when you
15:35escalate that bomb
15:36threat, who is
15:38assessing that
15:39is a genuine
15:40threat, because
15:40quite clearly,
15:41some of the
15:42airports in
15:42Europe are
15:44escalating
15:45threats, and
15:46there are
15:46hundreds of
15:47other threats
15:47that seem to
15:48be going in.
15:49This has emerged
15:49in the last two
15:50or three days
15:51that are not
15:52being escalated.
15:53I think at
15:53some stage, a
15:55little bit of
15:55talking to each
15:56other might be
15:56done.
15:57All right,
15:58Owen Curry,
15:59aviation expert
15:59and travel
16:00journalist, thank
16:01you for coming
16:01on the show
16:02this morning.
16:03And now let's
16:04cross to France,
16:04where major
16:05protests have been
16:06ongoing for weeks
16:07as the government
16:08struggles to push
16:09its budget through
16:10a divided
16:10parliament.
16:11And if that
16:13weren't enough for
16:13France's executive,
16:15a new book has
16:16now shed light on
16:16a series of
16:17revelations about
16:18French President
16:19Emmanuel Macron.
16:20Our reporter,
16:21Estelle Nilsson-Julien,
16:23is standing by for
16:23us in Paris.
16:24Good morning,
16:25Estelle.
16:25What can you tell
16:26us?
16:27Good morning,
16:28Stefan.
16:29Well, yes,
16:29this new book
16:30reveals a series
16:31of telegram messages
16:33that the French
16:34president exchanged
16:35with journalist
16:36Francoise Dugois,
16:38who's a political
16:38journalist,
16:40former advisor
16:41to Ségolène Royale,
16:42the socialist
16:43politician.
16:44And they exchanged
16:45the messages
16:46for two years.
16:47And this all began
16:48when the French
16:49president reached
16:50out to Francoise
16:51after she shared
16:53a message on Twitter
16:54in solidarity
16:55with Brigitte
16:56Macron,
16:57who had been
16:58facing an intense
16:59wave of cyber
17:00harassment and
17:01trolling in light
17:02of fake allegations
17:04and claiming
17:05that she was
17:05a trans person.
17:08So she was
17:09facing a wave
17:09of transphobia
17:10and Dugois
17:12tweeted,
17:13no woman deserves
17:14to be treated
17:15this way.
17:16Macron subsequently
17:17reached out to her
17:18in the telegram messages
17:20and their messaging
17:21and texting
17:23began from there.
17:24Stefan.
17:25And what does the book
17:26tell us about
17:27Macron and his
17:28decade of power?
17:30Well, these messages
17:31revealed that
17:32Macron is determined
17:34to prevent the
17:35National Rally
17:36Party, which is
17:37topping the polls
17:38ahead of next
17:39spring's presidential
17:40elections, from
17:41succeeding him.
17:43In his exchanges
17:44with the author,
17:44he defended his
17:46controversial decision
17:47to call snap
17:48elections in the
17:49summer of 2024,
17:50after the National
17:52Rally Party won a
17:53record number of
17:54seats in the
17:54European parliamentary
17:56elections.
17:57He also staunchly
17:58defended his decision
17:59not to name
18:00a left-wing
18:02prime minister
18:02following the
18:04results of these
18:05snap elections.
18:06at the same
18:07time, what we
18:08learned in these
18:08exchanges is that
18:10he was critical of
18:12mainstream politicians
18:14from the right
18:15and the accused of
18:16drifting towards the
18:17far right.
18:18Stefan.
18:19And you spoke to
18:20Françoise Degrois,
18:21the book's author.
18:22What did she make of
18:23all of this?
18:25She told me that
18:26Macron is grappling
18:28with his political
18:29legacy.
18:30He promised upon
18:31his victory to
18:33minimize the power
18:34of political extreme
18:35forces in France.
18:37And at present,
18:38he has not succeeded
18:39in doing so.
18:41But she also told me
18:42that from these
18:42exchanges, she feels
18:44that he is of a
18:45very combative nature
18:46and that he is still
18:48in a questioning phase,
18:49interrogating himself,
18:50searching for answers
18:52and solutions.
18:53As for why she
18:54published the book,
18:55she told me that
18:56in her view,
18:57Macron knows
18:58full well who she is.
18:59She's a former
19:01advisor, a journalist,
19:02and that he did not
19:03reveal any state
19:05secrets to her.
19:06And there have been
19:07some speculation,
19:08there have been
19:09speculation in France
19:09about whether the
19:10Élysée knew about
19:12this book.
19:13They say that they
19:14didn't.
19:15And Françoise Degrois
19:16also told me that
19:18the president was not
19:19aware of its publication
19:20until the days
19:22just before it was
19:23released.
19:23Stefan.
19:25Wow.
19:26Estelle-Lisson-Julien,
19:27thank you so much
19:27for your reporting.
19:29And that does it
19:30for us today.
19:30Thank you for
19:31watching.
19:32I'm Stefan Grober.
19:33Take care.
19:34And I'll see you
19:35on Monday.
19:37Bye.

Recommended