Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 1 hour ago
UNC councillors and aldermen at the Tunapuna/Piarco Regional Corporation are boycotting this year's Tunapuna Week celebrations, taking issue with more than half a million dollars being spent on the festivities. Minority Leader Prakash Barath says the money could have been better spent addressing infrastructure problems and shortages of basic resources in communities across the region. The UNC representatives are also alleging political discrimination in the allocation of development projects.
Transcript
00:00A week-long celebration is now at the center of a political row at the Tunapuno-Piaco Regional Corporation.
00:08UNC counselors and aldermen have collectively decided to boycott this year's Tunapuno Week celebrations,
00:15which begin on Friday with a military parade and conclude with a civic awards ceremony.
00:21Their objection centers on the proposed expenditure of more than $500,000 on the festivities,
00:27which they argue comes at a time when communities are struggling with deteriorating infrastructure,
00:34inadequate maintenance, and shortages of essential equipment.
00:38In a media statement, Minority Leader Prakash Bharath says,
00:43This decision is not about opposing cultural celebrations or civic recognition.
00:48It's about accountability, fairness, and the responsible management of taxpayers' money.
00:53The UNC representatives claim their electoral districts have not been allocated development program projects,
01:00despite other districts continuing to benefit.
01:04They argue that any reduction in funding should affect all counselors equally, regardless of political affiliation.
01:11The counselors say more than half a million dollars proposed for Tunapuno Week
01:15could instead finance development projects in at least three UNC-represented electoral districts.
01:23They are demanding that the PNM-led council disclose how development funds have been distributed across the region
01:29and explain why UNC counselors have received no projects.
01:34But their concern extends beyond the allocation of development funds.
01:38The UNC representatives claim construction teams within the corporation have been operating for more than three years
01:45without adequate materials to carry out routine repairs and maintenance.
01:50They also allege that municipal teams lack the basic tools and equipment needed to perform their duties effectively.
01:58Barrett asks,
01:59How can the PNM-led council justify spending over $500,000 on a week of celebrations
02:05while its own construction teams lack the materials to carry out basic repairs?
02:10The counselors maintain that these shortages directly affect the corporation's ability to respond to residents' everyday needs,
02:18including road and drainage repairs.
02:20They are now calling for a public breakdown of the Tunapuno Week expenditure,
02:24full disclosure of development program allocations,
02:28and urgent investment in materials and equipment for municipal workers.
02:33And while they acknowledge the importance of celebrating Tunapuno's history, culture, and community achievements,
02:39they insist essential services must take priority.
02:43Barrett says,
02:43We will not lend our presence to these festivities
02:47while serious questions about the allocation of public resources remain unanswered.
02:51The UNC counselors say their boycott is a statement of principle and demand for accountability,
02:57insisting the council owes residents' answers, development, and responsible stewardship of public funds.