00:00 So, how that exchange could amount to me admitting to doctoring an image is insidious and really
00:11 dangerous journalism. Any mention of meadows and willow trees came out of the person doing
00:21 the interview, not my mouth. I did my best to ignore it and focus on what I wanted to
00:27 talk about. So to see an article saying as fact that I did what I did not do is extraordinary
00:40 to me and then to try and merge it with this current news cycle of what's happening is
00:50 tragic to see.
00:51 [BLANK_AUDIO]
01:01 [BLANK_AUDIO]
01:11 [BLANK_AUDIO]
01:21 [BLANK_AUDIO]
01:31 [BLANK_AUDIO]
01:41 [BLANK_AUDIO]
01:51 [BLANK_AUDIO]
02:01 [BLANK_AUDIO]
02:11 [BLANK_AUDIO]
02:31 [BLANK_AUDIO]
02:41 >> I just got back to reality from the Oscars and unfortunately there's been an article
02:47 on the Daily Mail saying that I have admitted to doctoring the pregnancy announcement portrait
02:55 of Meghan. Apparently I was switching out trees and meadows and I admitted to this in
03:02 an episode of a podcast called Private Passions. This is crazy.
