Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 6 days ago
A forensic psychologist testifying as a rebuttal witness for prosecutors in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial returned to court Tuesday, Aug. 25 to discuss his opinion on her criminal responsibility in the killings of her three children.

Category

People
Transcript
00:00Her awareness of the illegality and moral wrongfulness of such killing is best appraised
00:06by understanding these acts as a serious suicide attempt combined with altruistic
00:12filicide, killing her children out of love, rather than as a response to command hallucinations.
00:19And did you form an opinion to a reasonable degree of psychological certainty as to whether
00:24Ms. Clancy was able to conform her conduct to the requirements of the law when she killed
00:29her children?
00:30Yes.
00:30And what is that opinion?
00:32That her capacity to conform her conduct to the requirements of the law is, again, best
00:38understood by considering the seriousness of her suicide attempt and her strong desire
00:44not to leave her children.
00:47She demonstrated such self-control throughout the day on January 24th, and her actions between
00:535.15 and 6 p.m. that afternoon were influenced by her depression and her hopelessness about
01:00her life and the desire to end the pain she had experienced since October.
01:06Although this depression and hopelessness influenced her decisions, she retained control over whether,
01:13when, and how she carried it out and the inclusion of her children.
01:20My clinical opinion is that she was criminally responsible on January 24th.
Comments

Recommended