- 1 week ago
This week, we’re looking into the latest developments in the case of Nick Reiner, who is accused of killing his parents, beloved Hollywood couple Rob and Michele Reiner. He’s been trying to access the trust fund his parents set up for him to pay for his defense – but is that a violation of the Slayer Statute? Another case we’ll dive into family murder -- the Lindsay Clancy case. She is a mother accused of killing her three children, and the details have opened up a discussion around postpartum depression and postpartum psychosis. We’ll also touch on the investigation into the death of actress Hayden Panettiere, though crime is not currently suspected. Before we get into those cases, we’ll cover crime updates from across the U.S., including Derek Chauvin’s attempt to get his 2020 murder conviction for the death of George Floyd overturned. Then, we’ll hear discussions about parents taking part of the punishment when their children commit crimes and about school shooter drills.
Featuring audio from Special thanks to KDKA Radio in Pittsburgh, KYW Newsradio in Philadelphia, WWJ Newsradio in Detroit WCCO News Talk in the Twin Cities, WBBM Newsradio in Chicago, Tommy Tucker out of WWL in New Orleans, the Dana & Parks Show out of KMBZ in Kansas City, KNX News in Los Angeles, WBEN News and Talk in Buffalo, the Chad Benson Show out of KRLD 1080 in Dallas and the Marc Cox Morning Show out of KFTK in St. Louis.
Featuring audio from Special thanks to KDKA Radio in Pittsburgh, KYW Newsradio in Philadelphia, WWJ Newsradio in Detroit WCCO News Talk in the Twin Cities, WBBM Newsradio in Chicago, Tommy Tucker out of WWL in New Orleans, the Dana & Parks Show out of KMBZ in Kansas City, KNX News in Los Angeles, WBEN News and Talk in Buffalo, the Chad Benson Show out of KRLD 1080 in Dallas and the Marc Cox Morning Show out of KFTK in St. Louis.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00:05This is a true crime roundup from the On Deadline podcast. We explore crime stories reported on by
00:00:12Odyssey's radio newsrooms across the country. I'm your host, Lauren Berry. This week, we're
00:00:19looking into the latest developments in the case of Nick Reiner, who is accused of killing his
00:00:25parents, beloved Hollywood power couple Rob and Michelle Reiner. He's been trying to access the
00:00:31trust fund his parents set up for him to pay for his defense. But is that a violation of the
00:00:38Slayer
00:00:38rule? We'll look into that. Another case we're diving into in this episode also involves family
00:00:47murder. It's the Lindsay Clancy case out of Massachusetts. Clancy is a mother accused of
00:00:53killing her three children, and the details of her case have opened up a discussion around
00:00:58postpartum depression and the more rare postpartum psychosis condition. We'll also touch on the
00:01:06investigation into the death of actress Hayden Panettiere, though crime is not currently suspected
00:01:12in that case. Before we get into those cases, we'll cover some crime updates from across the U.S.,
00:01:20including Derek Chauvin's attempt to get his 2020 murder conviction for the death of George Floyd
00:01:26overturned. Then we'll hear discussions about parents getting punished when their children commit crimes
00:01:32and about school shooter drills. First, we have the case of an 18-year-old accused of killing his
00:01:40girlfriend, a recent high school graduate who was headed to California, where she was set to play
00:01:46soccer for Penn West. Here's the Big K morning show out of Odyssey Station KDKA in Pittsburgh with
00:01:54the story. State police say a college soccer player was killed Wednesday night by her boyfriend. His
00:02:00mother is accused of trying to help him cover it up. 18-year-old Royce Moser is charged with homicide
00:02:06in the death of 18-year-old Caroline Heintz, a recent graduate of Peters High School and a student
00:02:11to Penn West California. Moser's mother, Rachel, is charged with hindering apprehension, evidence
00:02:17tampering, and more. The DA says Royce and Caroline were talking about the future of their
00:02:22relationship when he stabbed her in the chest. Moser allegedly put Caroline's body in her vehicle
00:02:28and drove to his mother's house where attempts were made to clean up the blood. Investigators say
00:02:33Moser, followed by his mother, drove to California Borough and left his dead girlfriend and her SUV in a
00:02:39parking lot. Trooper Rocco Gagliardi. We're talking about an 18-year-old girl that was ready to start
00:02:46life and now she can no longer get to pursue her dreams, which is really unfortunate. Court paperwork
00:02:51says Moser told investigators a demon told him to stab his girlfriend. Odyssey Station KYW News Radio in
00:03:00Philadelphia reported on sentencing for men convicted of killing a rapper in 2020. Like in our last dispatch,
00:03:08the victim was just 18 years old when he died. Two men convicted in the murder of an 18-year
00:03:13-old
00:03:13rapper six years ago in West Philly learned their fate today. Donovan Williams will spend the rest of
00:03:18his life in prison for his role in the July 2020 shooting death of Amir Johnson Day. Baj Dini was
00:03:25sentenced to 13 and a half to 42 years. District Attorney Larry Krasner says this was a long time coming.
00:03:31Here we are six years after the homicide and finally there is a verdict and finally there
00:03:37is a consequence. The shooting happened on July 5th of 2020 at a home on 61st Street near Master Street.
00:03:44The DA says it took more than 15 months to track down one of the defendants and three years to
00:03:48find
00:03:48the other. Day's mother says she's grateful for the persistence of investigators. And I just wanted to
00:03:54thank everybody who put in all of this time to give my son justice. His birthday is this month so
00:04:00this
00:04:01is a perfect happy birthday for him. Krasner's office still seeking information on this shooting
00:04:07though saying one or two more people may have been involved.
00:04:13One of the most reported on and discussed crime cases of 2020 was the killing of black man George Floyd
00:04:21at the hands of white police officer Derek Chauvin in Minneapolis. Chauvin was convicted in connection
00:04:28with the death and is currently serving concurrent state and federal sentences that are both more than
00:04:3420 years. Now he's seeking to have his state murder conviction overturned. Odyssey's WCCO News and Talk
00:04:43in the Twin Cities has the details. Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is again asking for
00:04:50his state murder conviction in the 2020 killing of George Floyd to be overturned. Chauvin and his
00:04:56legal team argue the assignment of Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison to prosecute the case was
00:05:00illegitimate. They also argue that Chauvin's due process rights were violated because the Hennepin
00:05:05County District Court failed to convene a grand jury before any charging decision. Previous legal efforts by
00:05:11Chauvin have been unsuccessful including when the Supreme Court rejected an appeal of his conviction for
00:05:16second-degree murder. Two other attempts for post-conviction relief have also been rejected.
00:05:22Mark Fry, News Talk 830 WCCO. Chauvin right now is simultaneously serving a 21-year federal sentence for
00:05:28violating Floyd's civil rights and a 22-and-a-half-year state sentence for second-degree murder.
00:05:34In Detroit, Odyssey Station WWJ News Radio provided an update on the case of a man accused of killing
00:05:42multiple family members. 25-year-old Livonia man accused of killing multiple family members in
00:05:49June appeared in court for a competency hearing this morning and is now seeking an independent
00:05:55review. 25-year-old Gage Pierce, the man accused of shooting and killing his mother, father, brother,
00:06:02and brother's girlfriend in their Livonia home in June, has been ruled incompetent to stand trial,
00:06:08but will now undergo an independent review to see if he can be ruled competent. At this morning's
00:06:13hearing in 16th District Court in Livonia, Pierce spoke on his own behalf as to why he thinks he
00:06:19should be ruled competent. What I would like to speak on has been falsely misconstrued in those reports
00:06:27that my expressions have been unduly limited in the sense of, firstly, I am confined to a space where
00:06:37it's a sub-day room in Section 2C of this jail, where I am stuck in such a shielded space
00:06:48with lack of sunlight.
00:06:51Pierce also said instances of him laughing don't reflect his competency in this
00:06:57case. There was talk about his ability to work with his attorney as well, and Pierce ended up
00:07:02requesting a new attorney at the end of the hearing. About a dozen family and friends were in attendance
00:07:07for the proceedings, which will now be picked up on October 29th, with Pierce facing four counts of
00:07:13first-degree murder. In Livonia, Luke Sloan, WWJ Newsradio. Now we'll hear some discussion related to
00:07:21the parents of children who commit crimes and school shootings. Two issues that have intersected
00:07:28in at least two cases. The Oxford school shooting committed by 15-year-old Ethan Crumbly in Michigan,
00:07:36and the Appalachee high school shooting committed by 14-year-old Colt Gray in Georgia. In both cases,
00:07:42the young teens' parents have also faced legal ramifications for the tragedies, along with their
00:07:48sons. Tommy Tucker of Odyssey Station WWL in New Orleans, Louisiana, discussed parental responsibility
00:07:56when their children commit crimes with an expert this week. Let's listen in.
00:08:07Dane Cialino, professor of law at Loyola. Morning, Dane. How are you?
00:08:11Morning, Tommy. Just fine.
00:08:12Talking about today, parental responsibility when it comes to kids and committing crimes. What does
00:08:19the Louisiana law say, Dane? At what point is a parent responsible for a crime their kid commits?
00:08:25Yeah, I mean, it's a tough question that we see with prosecutions across the country,
00:08:32but in Louisiana, a child's crime isn't automatically the parent's crime. But if a parent
00:08:40knowingly permits or aids or is criminally negligent in supervising a child, and the child engages
00:08:50in delinquent conduct, then there can be criminal consequences on the parent. But it's got to have
00:08:57that level of culpability for the parent. There's got to be some criminal negligence or knowledge or
00:09:02willful conduct where the parent's allowing the minor to engage in conduct that's specified in
00:09:11the statute. Things like violating curfew, missing school, underage drinking, having guns, those sorts of
00:09:18things.
00:09:19I was going to ask you, criminally negligent seems like a somewhat subjective term. Does the law lay out
00:09:24what specifically a parent can, I guess I start to say, do or fail to do to get them in
00:09:31trouble as
00:09:32far as the kid's behavior is concerned?
00:09:37Well, criminal negligence is one of those indeterminate terms in the law that we know
00:09:44that negligence means that a person does or fails to do something that a reasonable person would have
00:09:50done under similar circumstances. But in criminal cases, it's even more indeterminate and stringent in
00:09:58the sense that it's got to not be ordinary negligence, but a gross deviation from the standard
00:10:05of care of what a reasonable person would do. So I just threw out a lot of legal jargon there,
00:10:11but didn't really answer a lot of questions. That's the tough question presented to judges and juries
00:10:18when they have to evaluate whether someone was negligent in either a criminal or a civil case.
00:10:22Back to that reasonable person kind of thing?
00:10:26Back to the reasonable person standard of care. Yeah, it's something that I'm talking about today
00:10:32in my contracts class. It's something that comes up in all areas of the law. It's fairly, from a legal
00:10:39scholarship standpoint, fairly controversial, imposing criminal liability for just mere negligence.
00:10:45When somebody didn't know of a risk, but they should have known of the risk. But that's what
00:10:51happens in these child supervision cases. And I'm just wondering, Dane, does the fact that a parent
00:10:59is held responsible for the child's crime, does that lessen the culpability on the part of the child,
00:11:05or are we punishing everybody here?
00:11:09No. Children are held responsible in juvenile court for their crimes every day. So this is
00:11:17nothing that lessens the child's responsibility for juvenile delinquency, but the parents
00:11:24are held accountable for not adequately supervising.
00:11:28There's no sliding scale of, okay, Junior did this, but the parents didn't do that,
00:11:32so therefore Junior's not really responsible for that. None of that happens at all.
00:11:38Yeah, and in fact, it seems that, to me anyway, that this parental criminal responsibility is almost
00:11:45a lightning strike. There are, you only see it really in these high-profile cases, these school
00:11:52shooter cases, the mass shootings. You don't really see it for ordinary juvenile delinquency,
00:12:01of which there is a lot of in urban centers all over the United States. You don't see a lot
00:12:06of
00:12:07efforts by prosecutors in those kind of, I hate to say it, but ordinary run-of-the-mill cases of
00:12:13juvenile delinquency. But if it's a high-profile case, and it's investigated, and the parents are
00:12:22found to be somewhat culpable, or very culpable, then you see the prosecutions.
00:12:26I remember doing an interview with somebody, and I don't remember the details of it, but it was
00:12:32basically, they called the police on their own child because they couldn't do anything. It's like,
00:12:36I don't know, he's out of control. Help me out here. Would that be a mitigating factor
00:12:40if the parents had done something like that beforehand?
00:12:44Oh, very much so, yeah. Yeah, very much so. Any real effort by parents to get help or assistance from
00:12:52law enforcement or social workers is going to look to be looked upon by prosecutors quite
00:13:00favorably. What about the civil aspect of this?
00:13:03That's a lot easier. Parents are responsible for the torts committed by their children,
00:13:13and they can even be liable without being negligent themselves. So we are almost strictly liable for
00:13:22the torts committed by our children, and there's often typically insurance coverage for that sort of
00:13:28thing, but that's a lot easier case to make, and you do see that those sorts of lawsuits brought more
00:13:34often by personal injury lawyers. And apparently there's no, I would think there's no floor on
00:13:40that, but what about the ceiling? Is it the age of majority 17? Yeah, I mean, once a child is
00:13:4718 years
00:13:48old, he's responsible for his own torts, and his parents aren't going to be responsible for those.
00:13:54So, you know, that's why some parents have been known to emancipate their children in an effort to
00:14:01avoid liability for torts committed by wayward children. You don't see it often, but it's
00:14:07something that parents have thought about. You read my mind, because that's what I was going to ask
00:14:12you. What is the legal age to emancipate a child in Louisiana?
00:14:17Ah, well, I mean, there's judicial emancipation, there's emancipation by juridical act. I'd have to
00:14:23research the exact ages. Again, it's not something you really see very often, but it is an option.
00:14:31Primarily, that's to avoid liability. A parent would do that, right, for the most part?
00:14:37That's right. And courts are going to be reluctant to do that, because the law assumes that parents
00:14:43are going to be responsible for rearing their children. And by emancipating a kid, that's
00:14:48essentially saying the parents have given up on parental authority.
00:14:53Is it in practice more of a threat than, like you're talking about a lightning bolt? It seems like
00:14:59when, rather than, I know they got a study that the University of Nebraska-Lincoln did
00:15:05with police chiefs and prosecuting attorneys, they said it's not really effective, but they
00:15:09do bring it out, I guess, sometimes politically, when it's like, we're going to charge your parents
00:15:13on this because they were negligent, when in fact, like you're saying, the high-profile cases
00:15:17get the attention, but not the everyday cases of juvenile delinquency.
00:15:23That's exactly right. And, I mean, that's really no way to run a criminal justice system
00:15:29is just to pick out the cases that are on TV for prosecution. But in this unusual area
00:15:37of criminal responsibility, that is something that does seem to drive some of these prosecutions.
00:15:42Schools across the U.S. have active shooter drills to prepare staff and students for potential
00:15:49school shooting incidents. According to gun violence prevention organization Everytown, USA,
00:15:56over 95 percent of American schools have active shooter drills. Following the 1999 Columbine High
00:16:04School massacre in Colorado, these shooter drills have become more common. However, some question how
00:16:11effective the drills actually are. And there has been some evidence that suggests they are
00:16:18detrimental to the mental health of students who go through them. In Kansas, a new law just changed
00:16:24the way these drills work. Dana Wright, Scott Parks, and Sam Stevie III of the Dana and Parks Show
00:16:31on Odyssey Station KMBZ in Kansas City discuss the news.
00:16:37Story here from Channel 5. Kansas schools cannot conduct an active shooter drill without first
00:16:43notifying parents and families have the right to opt their children out. Under a new state law
00:16:49taking effect this year, the Students Safe at School Act applies to every public and private school
00:16:56in Kansas. Under the law, schools must notify parents at least 24 hours before any active shooter drill.
00:17:04Students who opt out face no punishment. The law also bans drills that simulate a real shooting.
00:17:10You can't use fake gunshots. After every drill, schools must debrief students and have mental health support
00:17:16on site. By the way, K-5 no longer will participate in any school shooter drill.
00:17:23We've just traumatized a generation or two of people over this. And teachers. Do not forget the staff.
00:17:31Yeah, of course.
00:17:31There are teachers who have called into this program who said they, you know, what are we doing?
00:17:36Where you've got the SWAT team bursting in. I know we don't do this anymore, but back several years ago.
00:17:42Post Columbine.
00:17:43They would, you know, we're going to surprise attack everybody and let's just see how good
00:17:48you are at throwing a chair at the fake gunman who's, what are we doing?
00:17:53We had a overhead call at my grade school. So every year we had the fire drill, the tornado drill,
00:18:00and it seemed like we had one of fire and tornado for every three active shooter drills.
00:18:06And this was early 2000s. And the call would come over the loudspeaker and all the kids would
00:18:11run into the corner of the classroom and they'd lock the door and the principal would
00:18:15literally run around the school banging on different classroom doors. And if he could
00:18:19hear us inside, we would then go over, you know, remain quiet, stay out of sight of the
00:18:25doors. I wouldn't say it was traumatizing.
00:18:29Yeah.
00:18:29You knew they were drills. Okay.
00:18:31We had a certain call over the loudspeaker to know it was a drill and a certain call over
00:18:35the loudspeaker to know this is the real deal. But I don't really, in an emergency like that,
00:18:43the teachers need to know what to do.
00:18:45Agreed.
00:18:46Not the students. And the students are going to be freaking out either way if it's real.
00:18:51So are the teachers.
00:18:52I remember the day that I thought, that's it. I'm packing up the family and we're moving out
00:18:57of here. And it was a day I was on the air and I got, yep, I got the sweetest,
00:19:03oh, that
00:19:03sweet little face, a text. And it was a selfie from one of the children. And she said, we are
00:19:12on lockdown and we're in the dark and the teachers are telling us we have to hide and be quiet.
00:19:19But you always said to me, we're supposed to run. What am I supposed to do?
00:19:22Oh boy.
00:19:24And I remember that day, she was probably, she was probably 10 years ago, 11 years ago,
00:19:30thinking like, I'm done. I'm so done. We don't have any answers for this thing. No one has the
00:19:35courage to have the answers that we need to fix this thing. Right. And I've said it before, like I
00:19:42have never been so relieved that they are out of that phase of their life. And I've never asked
00:19:47them, I need to do that. Like, what do you remember about those drills? And do you remember
00:19:51being afraid? And, um, the, the one drill that sent them on lockdown that I think scared
00:19:56the heck out of everybody was, there was a report that there was somebody outside roaming
00:20:01around with, with a gun after some sort of burglary nearby or something. And it ended up
00:20:06being unfounded.
00:20:07Mm-hmm. But I wonder, um, were we traumatized with the nuclear blast drill, having to climb
00:20:14under a fake wood desk, knowing full well we would be vaporized anyway?
00:20:18Let me tell you the difference. At age seven, I didn't understand what a nuclear attack was. I knew
00:20:25the tone that they would do in the elementary school. And then you would go run out into the
00:20:29hallway and put your, you know, head against the brick.
00:20:31Kiss your butt goodbye.
00:20:32And that was kind of scary. But at seven, none of us understood what we were talking
00:20:37about with a nuclear holocaust, which had we understood, we would have said, then why
00:20:41are we doing this? We're all going to be vaporized.
00:20:43Mm-hmm.
00:20:44Seven-year-olds in school today that have gone through those drills will tell you, they know
00:20:48exactly what the bad man with the gun looks like that's coming into that school.
00:20:52That's the difference.
00:20:54Sam, you did go through these drills. If you knew they were, they were going to happen in
00:20:59advance, why would anybody make noise when somebody banged on the door anyway?
00:21:03Exactly. They were pointless. It was dumb. All of us kids would get in the corner of the
00:21:08room and, you know, crack jokes and try to see what we could get away with in terms of
00:21:13how much noise we could make before the teacher was like, you're going to get me in trouble.
00:21:16I feel so bad for the teachers.
00:21:17I think the tornado drill is legit.
00:21:21Oh, sure.
00:21:22Students should need to know.
00:21:23You need to know where to go.
00:21:24Teachers need to know.
00:21:25Yes.
00:21:25If there is a tornado, what are we going to do?
00:21:28Absolutely.
00:21:28If you're in the bathroom and the fire alarm starts going off and, you know, what stairwell
00:21:33do I go down? What door do I walk out of?
00:21:36All legitimate.
00:21:38What is going to happen, though, if you are among the group of kids who opt out of the
00:21:42school shooter drill? You just going to take you to Starbucks for the day?
00:21:47It says students will not be, cannot be punished at all.
00:21:51What would the punishment be?
00:21:53I don't know.
00:21:54But where are they going to go is my question, because for us, it was an entire school thing.
00:21:59I understand.
00:22:00But when they did the shooter drill at your school, where did everybody, including yourself,
00:22:05in the classroom go?
00:22:07In the classroom?
00:22:08We stayed in the classroom we were in, yes.
00:22:10Okay.
00:22:10So I'm assuming that a student whose parents have opted out would just sit at their desk,
00:22:17twiddle their thumbs.
00:22:18So they're still experiencing it then?
00:22:20How many?
00:22:21Yeah, I guess so.
00:22:22If you had to put a percentage on it, what percentage of people do you think will opt
00:22:25their kids out? Because I would have opted them out.
00:22:28Depends on what the alternative is for my kid to do.
00:22:31So if I opt my kid out, right, and they're not to take part in the drill, to Sam's point,
00:22:37where do they go?
00:22:38Do they get moved down to the cafeteria five minutes before this happens?
00:22:43Yeah, because in elementary school, it's not like they're going to go hop in a car and
00:22:46grab Starbucks.
00:22:47Right.
00:22:47So do the kids whose parents have opted them out, are they taken to the library?
00:22:52Do they go to the cafeteria and just sit and wait for 10 minutes, and then they get to
00:22:56go back to their classroom?
00:22:58What if they're the only one in that classroom who's been opted out?
00:23:01I think you'll be surprised how many people are going to opt their kids out of this.
00:23:04And I don't remember the tally, but we did have like three or four actual lockdown situations
00:23:10while I was there.
00:23:10They were never in the building.
00:23:12Was it bank robbery adjacent?
00:23:13That's the most common.
00:23:15It was located, there was pretty common that there were shootings like four or five blocks
00:23:19away, and they would be like, okay, we're going to go into lockdown.
00:23:24I just, to your point, Dana, they are so pointless because you do have to give them advance warning.
00:23:31Otherwise, the kids are going to lose it, and rightfully so.
00:23:37But if they know it's coming, you would never know that a school shooting is about to happen,
00:23:42sadly.
00:23:43No.
00:23:43Right?
00:23:43And sadly, that they even happen.
00:23:46But if everybody is given a warning, oh, by the way, Timmy, tomorrow at three o'clock
00:23:50or two o'clock, there's going to be an active shooter drill at your school.
00:23:54Okay, Mom.
00:23:58And what are they learning?
00:24:00It's just reinforcing the fact that this has happened and can happen.
00:24:04And really, if we're being honest, this is why I've got this problem with these new cameras
00:24:10that claim they can shoot a gun, like, spy a gun in a hallway.
00:24:15Zero eyes.
00:24:16By the time that has happened and someone has that weapon inside, it's over.
00:24:22There's not, I mean, you can teach the kids to hide.
00:24:25It didn't work in Sandy Hook.
00:24:28No, it didn't.
00:24:29You know, in...
00:24:31You can teach them the fire drill.
00:24:32It didn't work in whatever that one was.
00:24:35It's also the, quite frankly, the teachers that shoulder all of that responsibility in that moment.
00:24:45And it usually is a teacher who loses their life protecting those kids.
00:24:48Telephone number here is 913-586-7798.
00:24:51Would love to hear from the teachers or parents.
00:24:55Can you opt out if you're a teacher?
00:24:56I don't want to do it.
00:24:58If you're a parent, do you plan to opt your kid out?
00:25:17Late last year, the nation was shocked to hear that Rob Reiner,
00:25:22director of heartwarming audience favorite films like Stand By Me,
00:25:26When Harry Met Sally, and The Princess Bride, among others,
00:25:30was found slaughtered alongside his wife and frequent collaborator Michelle Singer Reiner.
00:25:36What seemed even more shocking was that the suspect arrested for the murders
00:25:41was their son, 32-year-old Nick Reiner.
00:25:45He's now on trial for murder, and he's pleaded not guilty.
00:25:49According to reports, Rob and Michelle's other children,
00:25:53son Jake Reiner and daughter Romy Reiner,
00:25:56testified before a grand jury that ultimately indicted Nick.
00:26:00Alan Jackson, an attorney known for representing Harvey Weinstein,
00:26:04has agreed to represent the defendant
00:26:06if Nick could get access to the money from a trust fund
00:26:10his parents established for him.
00:26:13Odyssey station KNX News in Los Angeles
00:26:15had the latest on the case this week.
00:26:20Nick Reiner's trying to get his hands on trust fund money
00:26:22for his murder defense,
00:26:23but the judge today pushed a hearing on that to the fall,
00:26:26so for now, Reiner remains broke, in jail,
00:26:29and relying on a public defender.
00:26:31Here's Emily Valdez.
00:26:32Nick Reiner has a public defender,
00:26:34and he wants big-time attorney Alan Jackson,
00:26:36but for that, he needs big-time money.
00:26:39The Reiner's had set up a trust for their children,
00:26:42including Nick Reiner.
00:26:43Attorney Chris Melcher is not involved in the case.
00:26:47There's money in that trust,
00:26:48and Nick, or really his attorney,
00:26:52wants that money for his criminal defense,
00:26:55but the trustee is saying,
00:26:57no, you can't have that money because you killed your parents.
00:27:01California has what's called a Slayer Statute,
00:27:03and that means people cannot inherit or get money from people
00:27:06they have likely killed.
00:27:07Notice the word likely.
00:27:09The bar is lower.
00:27:10This is not beyond a reasonable doubt,
00:27:12and Reiner was indicted by a grand jury.
00:27:15The judge in the probate court has sufficient information,
00:27:17I believe, to make a finding
00:27:21for that purpose of the killer air statute
00:27:24that Nick Reiner is responsible
00:27:26for the murder of his parents to deny payments.
00:27:29Of course, if other evidence came out in the future,
00:27:31which would show that somebody else killed the Reiner's,
00:27:34then Nick can reapply or petition for the money from the trust.
00:27:39Reiner sits in jail.
00:27:40His bail, $1.5 million.
00:27:42His next probate hearing is in October.
00:27:44I'm Emily Valdez, KNX News.
00:27:48For more on the Reiner case,
00:27:50Dana Wright, Scott Parks, and Sam Stevie III
00:27:52discussed the new developments this week.
00:27:56Did you see there is a new indictment
00:27:58that has been handed up
00:27:59alleging that the son of Rob and Michelle Reiner
00:28:03was, quote, lying in wait before he killed them,
00:28:07and that is an additional upgraded charge, by the way.
00:28:10He has been indicted on murder charges
00:28:12and the killing of his parents,
00:28:13and now there are additional charges
00:28:17that he was literally...
00:28:20The charge is, Scott, lying in wait.
00:28:22I didn't know that that was a thing.
00:28:24I didn't either.
00:28:25The grand jury had been meeting in secret,
00:28:26as they do,
00:28:27returned the indictment on July 20th.
00:28:29It was unsealed today.
00:28:32We know what lying in wait means,
00:28:33that he waited or hid from his victims
00:28:35in order to, quote, ambush them.
00:28:38What was the motive?
00:28:39I forget.
00:28:41Oh, it was just crazy?
00:28:42As an allegation,
00:28:43it is meant to show premeditation.
00:28:45And, of course,
00:28:48I don't know that many people dispute that.
00:28:51Well, yeah, if you're lying in wait to kill your...
00:28:53Sam, yes.
00:28:55Wasn't he living with them at the time?
00:28:57I believe so.
00:28:57It's a confusing charge, in my opinion,
00:29:00because wouldn't you be at the house anyway?
00:29:04I was watching a legal observer today,
00:29:06and she just said,
00:29:07while we don't know exactly what went on in that house,
00:29:10we know it was violent,
00:29:11we know there was a struggle,
00:29:13and these charges would indicate that he was hiding,
00:29:17waiting for them to come home,
00:29:20likely incapacitated dad first,
00:29:23who would have done anything and everything
00:29:25to protect his wife.
00:29:27See, and therein lies a difference, Sam.
00:29:30There is a difference between,
00:29:32even if he did live at the home,
00:29:34your parents come home,
00:29:35I think they were at a party
00:29:36that he was also at earlier in the night.
00:29:39There's a difference between
00:29:41your parents coming home
00:29:42and you're sitting on the couch, right?
00:29:44Oh, hi, mom.
00:29:45Hi, dad.
00:29:46I'm about to kill you.
00:29:47And then hiding behind the couch.
00:29:50I'm not saying that's where he was.
00:29:51I'm just using that as the example.
00:29:53And if he's hiding behind the couch,
00:29:56they walk in, think nothing is wrong,
00:30:00and that gives him an immediate advantage of surprise.
00:30:03Did he get access to his trust for his legal defense?
00:30:06Oh, he's trying.
00:30:07Listen to this.
00:30:07The indictment comes as he continues seeking unpaid money
00:30:11from a trust his parents established for him,
00:30:16saying he needs it to help in his defense, right?
00:30:19Reiner said in a court petition
00:30:20that the trustees who oversee the funds
00:30:22have denied the money to him,
00:30:24quote, without legal justification.
00:30:27The money was to have gone to Nick Reiner,
00:30:30quote, even if his parents were alive,
00:30:32according to the legal filing.
00:30:36Trustees won't share the exact amount,
00:30:38but here's what the filing says.
00:30:39Are you ready for this?
00:30:41Be careful.
00:30:42I may agree with it.
00:30:43Nick loved his parents.
00:30:44I don't agree with that.
00:30:45He is devastated by their deaths.
00:30:48He's not.
00:30:48But the facts about what did and did not happen to them
00:30:53are not the issue here.
00:30:56The issue is, do you still have a right
00:31:00to the money that they set aside for you
00:31:04when you killed them?
00:31:05Is there anything, flip it around, Scott.
00:31:08If someone dies and leaves you a million dollars,
00:31:10does that come with strings?
00:31:12Strings, you can only access that
00:31:14if you're going to use it for housing,
00:31:16or you can only access that
00:31:17if you're not going to buy your girlfriend
00:31:19a $300,000 car.
00:31:21If there weren't strings attached to this money,
00:31:24they are arguing they wanted him to have it,
00:31:27and that the reason he needs it is immaterial.
00:31:30Well, but the reason he needs it is a defense
00:31:33in a case where I believe he has pleaded not guilty.
00:31:36Is that correct?
00:31:37I believe so.
00:31:38It's probably going to be an insanity plea.
00:31:40Yes.
00:31:40In our legal system, you are innocent until proven guilty.
00:31:44He has not been proven guilty of the murders of his parents.
00:31:48Therefore, I would make the legal argument
00:31:51that he has every right to that money.
00:31:53I think there's a law, I'm pretty sure there is,
00:31:55that says you cannot profit off of the murder
00:31:59that you have committed.
00:32:02Now, you're going to say, and you're right,
00:32:03He's not convicted.
00:32:04He's not convicted yet.
00:32:06If you're right, that is a loophole that needs to be closed.
00:32:09Why?
00:32:10Because it would, follow me here,
00:32:12it would literally give people that are off their rocker
00:32:21almost ammunition to kill someone.
00:32:23If you know you're going to get $1.5 million,
00:32:27it's in a trust, if something, God forbid,
00:32:29if a plane goes down and something happens to mom and dad,
00:32:31I get $1.5 million.
00:32:32If you make it so that there isn't a murder exception,
00:32:36people would just go around killing people for the money.
00:32:39But once you're convicted, you can't spend your parents' money.
00:32:41Like, he's asking to spend it before.
00:32:45Right.
00:32:46No.
00:32:47He's not free.
00:32:48He's not out of jail, right?
00:32:50He's in jail.
00:32:53Obviously, with this case, all signs point in one direction.
00:32:56But if it weren't this case, and the individual didn't do it,
00:33:01are they not being convicted beforehand
00:33:03by being denied access to the money for their legal defense?
00:33:06He still has a legal defense.
00:33:07Might not be the world's best in L.A.,
00:33:09but he still has a defense.
00:33:10Will he be entitled to the best defense that he can afford?
00:33:12I feel like there should be an asterisk in any trust
00:33:15that says, I am setting this money aside for you.
00:33:19So long as you're not charged with killing me?
00:33:21So long as you don't murder me.
00:33:24But there's, Dana, I know.
00:33:26Okay.
00:33:26So long as you are not indicted for my murder.
00:33:31I mean, shouldn't that just be baseline common sense?
00:33:35No, because I will defend the system that we have.
00:33:40He is, at the moment, he is innocent.
00:33:43At the moment, he's innocent with a public defender.
00:33:47That only furthers my point.
00:33:49He's, because now we're getting into conversation about public defense.
00:33:53He doesn't have the best lawyer available.
00:33:56Correct.
00:33:57And he is facing charges that are extremely severe.
00:34:02They could seek the death penalty.
00:34:04Correct.
00:34:05At which point he would get different attorneys.
00:34:07I'm sure they have a death penalty defense team.
00:34:10We're talking about the, what's the Reiner son's name?
00:34:14Nick.
00:34:14Nick, Nick Reiner.
00:34:18Whether or not he should get the inheritance from his parents, even though he is accused of killing them, to
00:34:26fund his legal defense.
00:34:27And Dana and Sam, I think, are of the opinion that he should not.
00:34:31And I am of the opinion that he should.
00:34:34Not because I think he's innocent, but in this country you are considered, or you are innocent, until or unless
00:34:42you are proven guilty.
00:34:43And he's not at home on house arrest or anything, ordering Uber Eats or anything like that.
00:34:48He's in jail.
00:34:50He is charged with their murders.
00:34:53So, I was correct.
00:34:55It is a legal doctrine known as the Slayer Statute or the Slayer Rule.
00:35:00Slayer is capitalized.
00:35:01I'm assuming that means someone's name and not the active.
00:35:05That would be a really unfortunate name for a law like that.
00:35:08Nor the band.
00:35:08Under the legal doctrine known as the Slayer Statute, an individual who commits a felonious and intentional killing is legally
00:35:18barred from receiving any financial benefit, inheritance, or trust payout from the victim.
00:35:24Now, it does – I understand what you're saying, Scott.
00:35:27He hasn't been convicted yet.
00:35:28So, what, you give them all $1.5 million to essentially blow, which is money that should go to the
00:35:36other siblings who didn't murder their parents.
00:35:38Let me ask you this.
00:35:40Let's go to Steve in Lewisburg.
00:35:42Hello, Steve.
00:35:44Hello.
00:35:45Interesting discussion.
00:35:46I'm glad you're bringing this up.
00:35:47You didn't mean to raise it directly, but I've argued for some time now that we should perhaps at least
00:35:54think about reconsidering – not throw it out – but reconsidering whether innocent until proven guilty is really the right
00:36:03thing.
00:36:04Keep in mind, innocent until proven guilty dates back like 3,000 years.
00:36:08It was codified by the Romans in like 100 A.D.
00:36:11And we've always just lived with this idea that that's right, just, fair, a concept.
00:36:17But it came about at a time way before we had videotape, audiotape, ballistics, fingerprints, and a lot of other
00:36:25things.
00:36:26I just think in certain cases the burden should shift because I don't think innocent – you know, it made
00:36:33a lot of sense maybe in the Old West when it was like, hey, who pulled his gun first?
00:36:37And you had no proof other than people's testimony.
00:36:40But nowadays when you have some pretty overwhelming physical evidence, I bet you're innocent until proven guilty makes sense anymore.
00:36:49That is an – yeah, interesting and some would say radical theory, Steve.
00:36:54Do we not already handle certain cases even though, okay, you are innocent until proven guilty, okay?
00:37:01Correct.
00:37:01Then why is there no bond?
00:37:02Why are you behind bars until trial?
00:37:04Well, we don't let homicidal maniac suspects, not convicted yet, we don't let them roam around with the rest of
00:37:12us.
00:37:12Well, and some people would say that that is unconstitutional, that they're – I can't remember which amendment it is
00:37:18– that you have to have basically a reasonable bond.
00:37:22No bond is not reasonable.
00:37:24I'm not making that argument.
00:37:26I'm saying what some people would say.
00:37:27But you wouldn't want Ted Bundy living next door to you while he awaited trial, right?
00:37:32No, I would not.
00:37:33So I do think in some cases, innocent until proven guilty, it's the best system that we have.
00:37:40But do we really believe that?
00:37:42And I would say to you in high-profile cases where there's a risk to the public, we don't because
00:37:47we keep them in jail pending their conviction.
00:37:51I don't even think we have innocent until proven guilty anymore because your entire life will be ruined even if
00:37:56you didn't do the crime and say your trial takes two years to come together.
00:38:01You now spent two years in jail.
00:38:03What are you going to tell a future employer?
00:38:04Hey, oh, well, yeah, I was convicted of murdering my parents, but I didn't do it and I finally got
00:38:09off.
00:38:09But they kept me in jail for two years because they decided that was best for society despite the fact
00:38:14that I wasn't a killer.
00:38:16Richard Jewell, who was implicated.
00:38:20Was he ever charged?
00:38:21He was implicated in the Olympic bombing, but he didn't do it.
00:38:26And was actually just a loving, good employee.
00:38:34Anna in Kansas City.
00:38:36You get the last word.
00:38:37Anna, hello.
00:38:38Okay, I really feel that the money should be used for his lawyers.
00:38:45I believe that he was schizophrenic and his parents, I know, did everything they could to help him, but they
00:38:54had put him on new medicine.
00:38:55He wasn't doing well on it.
00:38:57I don't think that he was in his right mind when he killed his parents.
00:39:01And I think that he needs a lawyer to help him.
00:39:05Anna, thank you for the call.
00:39:07This is where the lying in wait charge becomes interesting.
00:39:09Because if you had some sort of psychotic snap, right?
00:39:17You just snapped.
00:39:19Why would you lie in wait?
00:39:20And how long did he lie in wait?
00:39:21And that's what we don't have those details.
00:39:23I think that updated indictment today on the lying in wait is kind of a wink and a nod to
00:39:32everybody to say, do not completely blame this on mental health.
00:39:36Is there a mental health component to it?
00:39:37Absolutely.
00:39:39But he was also in and out of rehabs countless times.
00:39:42Oh, his parents were at their wits end, Scott.
00:39:44He was on God knows how many medications.
00:39:47And who knows what that did to his psyche.
00:39:50From the text line, and it's a good point.
00:39:53Steve was making the argument, well, maybe it shouldn't be innocent until proven guilty necessarily in this day and age
00:40:00because of all the videos and all this stuff that we have now.
00:40:04Well, somebody points out on the text line, what about AI?
00:40:07Yeah, but we have you on video saying this.
00:40:10Do we?
00:40:14Hollywood was again shocked by death just last weekend.
00:40:18This time, 36-year-old Hayden Panettiere, an actress known for her roles on shows like Heroes and Nashville, who
00:40:26had been in the business since she was just a baby, was found dead.
00:40:30She was unresponsive when first responders found her in her Greenville, South Carolina apartment last Sunday.
00:40:38Her on-and-off-again boyfriend, Brian Hickerson, who faced allegations of domestic violence in 2020, was at the scene.
00:40:46In Panettiere's recent memoir, This Is Me, A Reckoning, she said that Hickerson once beat her so badly that she
00:40:55didn't leave the house for weeks.
00:40:58He has not been charged with anything regarding her death.
00:41:02Panettiere's death is under investigation by the Greenville Police Department and the Drug Enforcement Administration.
00:41:08Crime and Terrorism Analyst Brad Garrett joined Odyssey Station WBEN in Buffalo to discuss the case.
00:41:16Investigation into the death of actress Hayden Panettiere.
00:41:20The DEA now joining this investigation, Brad, which I guess now over the past few days appears maybe a bit
00:41:29more complicated than it had initially.
00:41:32What's your read on what's been going on here?
00:41:34So, again, we don't really know the details about this story other than, yes, she was found unconscious, had passed
00:41:44away.
00:41:45Apparently, a boy, and on again, off again, as has been described, boyfriend, and the boyfriend's brother apparently reported that
00:41:54she was unconscious.
00:41:56I presume they were at whatever location she was where she was found.
00:42:01And if there was no apparent, like, gunshots, strangulation, knife wounds, things that physically you could look at her and
00:42:14see that she's been hurt,
00:42:15then what does that leave you?
00:42:17Something she ingested or snorted, whatever it might be.
00:42:22And so I think the preliminary was that it was a drug overdose.
00:42:27But the question is, is that true?
00:42:30The thing that's missed in cases like this, Brent, is that you really have to sort of dig deep into
00:42:37the following.
00:42:38You start with who found her and why were they there?
00:42:42Now, obviously, she had this relationship with this guy.
00:42:45But why was he and his brother there?
00:42:48Were there drugs other than prescribed drugs at the location?
00:42:54So you may well want to call in the DEA to do the following.
00:43:00If, in fact, there were other drugs found, where did they come from?
00:43:05Because they're going to have a network of who are the drug distributors in or around where she resides.
00:43:11The other is, even the prescription drugs running down, you know, were they correct?
00:43:18In other words, was she being prescribed things that she shouldn't have been prescribed?
00:43:22That's another angle to this.
00:43:24It may have no relevance, but that's something they'll look into.
00:43:28Because it's all of that that will give you maybe better insight as to what happened to her.
00:43:35Apparently, she had addiction issues for several years.
00:43:39But what is it that actually took her life this time?
00:43:44And toxicology may give you the answer or some of the answer to that.
00:43:49But that takes a while to come back.
00:43:52Is this getting a little extra scrutiny because we're talking about a high-profile celebrity?
00:43:58In some way, this reminds me of what happened when Matthew Perry died.
00:44:05Well, that's right.
00:44:07For whatever reason, high-profile people get high-profile attention from the media.
00:44:15I mean, when Lady Gaga's French Bulldogs were stolen.
00:44:19I mean, I was even talking about that.
00:44:22I mean, would we talk about your neighbor's French Bulldogs getting stolen?
00:44:26No.
00:44:27But that's just the way that the news ebbs and flows.
00:44:35Panetere was also open about her struggles with postpartum depression and addiction.
00:44:41She even revealed that her longtime partnership with skincare brand Neutrogena
00:44:46ended after she discussed postpartum depression during a live interview.
00:44:50She told podcast host Jay Shetty the ordeal made her realize how little people really understand
00:44:56about this condition, which the Mayo Clinic says is, quote,
00:45:01not a character flaw or a weakness, but a complication that can arise from giving birth.
00:45:07The Mayo Clinic also notes that postpartum psychosis is a more extreme and rare disorder than
00:45:15postpartum depression, but it's also a condition that can develop after a woman gives birth.
00:45:21The defense team for Lindsay Clancy, a Massachusetts woman on trial for the alleged killing of her
00:45:28three children, have argued that she suffered from postpartum psychosis.
00:45:34Here's more on that condition from Odyssey Station WBBM News Radio in Chicago.
00:45:41Only about one or two in 1,000 women experience postpartum psychosis.
00:45:45Dr. Kate Johnson, chair of psychiatry at Loyola Medical Center,
00:45:49says the severe depression and break from reality can develop after their bodies have gone through
00:45:54pregnancy and birth.
00:45:56They will scavenge things from their own body.
00:45:58They will take calcium out of their own bones to make sure the baby has what they need.
00:46:02That definitely can cause problems for the mom in a physiologic kind of way after delivery.
00:46:09Dr. Johnson hopes Lindsay Clancy's trial shines a light on the problem while the country's
00:46:14behind in diagnosing and treating other mental illness more broadly.
00:46:18Trying to then get a hold of somebody who knows and understands and has seen and treated
00:46:24and feels comfortable with postpartum depression or postpartum, just perinatal mental health
00:46:29in general, can be really, really challenging.
00:46:31Nancy Hardy, News Radio 105.9 at WBBM.
00:46:36Chad Benson at Odyssey Station KRLD 1080 in Dallas did a deeper dive into the Clancy case
00:46:44and postpartum conditions this Friday.
00:46:47The question is, is she guilty of murder?
00:46:54Not, did she do it?
00:46:57And I know that sounds weird, but if you're not following the case, and it's got a lot
00:47:01of headlines about Lindsay Clancy.
00:47:04This is a woman who in 2023, January 2023, sends her husband out to run an errand.
00:47:13And then she proceeded to kill her three children.
00:47:19So you're thinking, well, obviously she did it.
00:47:22Yes, but we know about postpartum depression, but there's also something called postpartum psychosis.
00:47:35And it's very interesting to look at this case, because I was, you know, I talked about this
00:47:43the other day when my wife had Charlie, my little one, she turns eight in a few days.
00:47:49She had postpartum depression.
00:47:52Yeah, think about it, right?
00:47:53You're, you're, you've got this living being inside of you, feeding off of you.
00:47:57Your hormones are out of control and then it's get on with life.
00:48:01Cause here comes the baby and all the other things.
00:48:05And there was some absolute postpartum depression.
00:48:12Now, did it rise to the level of psychosis?
00:48:15Not even close, but a lot of women are speaking up and they're angry because they feel like
00:48:21she's getting a raw deal.
00:48:22Now here's the thing.
00:48:23She killed the kids.
00:48:25There's nobody's, nobody is arguing that he did it or that it was some other monster.
00:48:31She killed the kids.
00:48:34And she said, she heard voices that said that she needed to kill the kids.
00:48:39She heard voices after she went to the doctors and she got, you know, prescribed SSRIs and they
00:48:48only got louder.
00:48:49I mean, there, there's no doubt about who did it.
00:48:54The question is, can she sell the jury?
00:48:59And it sounds weird to say that, that it was a break.
00:49:03Now there's some, look, many people have come forward and said that when they spoke to her,
00:49:10she was having a breakdown.
00:49:12She, she sought medical care.
00:49:14She went all of these things that, you know, that you would say, okay, this is not somebody
00:49:17who just magically did something and came up with some sort of diagnosis.
00:49:22But her treating psychiatrist said she never appeared to be psychotic.
00:49:28The prosecution said, look, she created the opportunity by sending him away so she could
00:49:34do it.
00:49:34But her chaplain, her mother, several other people that were associated with her family
00:49:41and friends all said that she had changed and that she had threatened to harm the children.
00:49:52And after it happened, she even told the chaplain that she said the kids were safe now.
00:49:59So it is, you know, it's, again, how real is this postpartum, you know, psychosis?
00:50:11It's real.
00:50:14Some people have it and they don't do anything.
00:50:17There's a lot of questions too about, obviously she, there was plenty of signs.
00:50:22Why did nobody pick up on those signs in a much different way?
00:50:25Talking about family members, maybe saying, look, we need to take the kids away from her.
00:50:30And, you know, and, and more and more people are speaking out about this.
00:50:35And it, it is a fascinating and tragic story.
00:50:41And I've watched a lot of the stuff and I've been reading a lot of it.
00:50:45And my wife and I have talked about it because obviously, you know, she's, she's following it.
00:50:49And it's because it's children.
00:50:55Because you're a mom, you know, you go back and you've seen some of these people that have done stuff
00:51:01to their kids.
00:51:03And was it an incident that they had, it was a momentary break that they really were psychotic?
00:51:13Or was it an excuse?
00:51:15I mean, it's such a hard thing.
00:51:17And to, to label everybody as evil and a killer and they did this.
00:51:22I mean, you're killing your three kids.
00:51:24There's got to be a little something wrong with you.
00:51:26I mean, to do that.
00:51:28And, and, you know, we can go back and talk about all these, these women in the past that have
00:51:32done, you know, these things.
00:51:35And there's been plenty of them.
00:51:37I mean, is there, they're there.
00:51:39Is there a break?
00:51:41And I, it is a hard thing because it is a tragic thing.
00:51:48It is an awful thing.
00:51:50It is the thing where you sit there and you go, it churns your stomach because you think of those
00:51:54three little kids and what she did.
00:51:58But then you have a lot of people that come out and say, no, she's just evil and she needs
00:52:01to rot in hell.
00:52:03And my, uh, my buddy comes who, who works with local station comes on before me.
00:52:10He thinks she's just evil.
00:52:12She needs to rot in hell.
00:52:13She needs to be executed.
00:52:14And then there's no such thing as, as this.
00:52:17And I, I don't think it's as, it's as easy as there is or isn't.
00:52:22I think there's a lot more to it than, you know, you, she's got her supporters and there's plenty of
00:52:26them out there.
00:52:27It's just, it's a fascinating thing.
00:52:29When you think about the psychosis, could somebody have a break that the mind, you know, and we've taught, you
00:52:35know, like you get a lot of people out there, they're, they're, you know, not guilty by reason of insanity.
00:52:39That rarely happens anymore.
00:52:42I mean, it just doesn't very rarely does it happen, but we were talking yesterday.
00:52:47It's like, and I've said this over the years is how can you look at somebody like a Jeffrey Dahmer
00:52:51and think to themselves that that's, that's a normal thing.
00:53:00That was, you know, eating a human being and keeping their body parts in the fridge.
00:53:05How do you, how do you, how do you, I, I just, I don't know the mind, all of it.
00:53:08It's, and this is of course become an incident where, you know, you sit there and you, you, you've got
00:53:15this, a lot of people who are there to support her.
00:53:20Because they've been through postpartum depression and, you know, they look and say, you know, there by the grace of
00:53:27God, go I, but it doesn't mean that she's, you know, not guilty.
00:53:32She did kill her children.
00:53:35It's just, did she do it and she had no way to stop herself because she had had a break
00:53:47with reality.
00:53:51It's just fascinating and tragic.
00:53:53The Mark Cox Morning Show out of Odyssey Station 97.1 The Talk in St. Louis also discussed the Clancy
00:54:02case, specifically the role medications play in it.
00:54:06Kim, she's the, the mother accused of murdering her three children and apparently trying to take her own life while
00:54:14battling postpartum depression.
00:54:17That's the argument the defense is using here.
00:54:20It's raised a lot of eyebrows and they asked Dr. Drew about this yesterday on, on Hannity show.
00:54:26And his question was, they found out this woman's medication list.
00:54:29Many, many of the medicines she was on don't interact well with, with the others.
00:54:35His question was in today's medical environment with everything that's online and these health charts and everything.
00:54:42Like if you, if you're with BJC or, you know, SSM or whatever it happens to be, your doctor can
00:54:49pull up your entire list of medicines and look at them.
00:54:51That should be able to.
00:54:52It was the exact question I had asked when I initially talked about this was how was that not known?
00:54:57Because, well, first of all, you're asked usually what other medications are you taking?
00:55:00And I understand you can easily lie about that on some medical form.
00:55:03But don't you think that she would have wanted to list those because she'd want to make sure that they
00:55:08weren't having some weird reaction with any new medication she was prescribed?
00:55:11Or did she doctor shop?
00:55:13Dr. Drew said the U.S. has, quote, eviscerated primary care, making medications and prescriptions a bit of a complicated
00:55:22topic.
00:55:23I don't have a primary care physician.
00:55:25There is one person I went to to try to set that up.
00:55:27But if I'm sick, because I'm not sick very often, I go to urgent care.
00:55:31It's just way easier.
00:55:32That's part of the problem.
00:55:33But it's also not the answer.
00:55:34Because my mother will go to the same doctor she's been seeing for five or six years, and we'll go
00:55:40in and sit down in an appointment, and they will look at her and say, what medications are you on?
00:55:49And every time, my answer to them is, whatever you prescribed her.
00:55:54Look in your chart.
00:55:55Why are you asking me?
00:55:56And I guess, ultimately, what they're asking is, has another doctor prescribed something we don't know about?
00:56:03That would be a better way of asking that question.
00:56:06That's not the way they ask it.
00:56:08Well, they're probably not taking the time to look it up because they truly don't know.
00:56:11They ask the same questions over and over again.
00:56:13And again, I get you have to update information and things like that.
00:56:16But when my son had to get stitches the other day, I went to a Mercy Urgent Care.
00:56:20I said, hey, they said, oh, we can't help you go to this one.
00:56:23It was within the same network, Mercy.
00:56:25And I said, can you please call them first and make sure that they can handle this?
00:56:28And they said, we don't have their number.
00:56:30We have no way of talking to them.
00:56:31You're in the same network, and you can't, there's no number.
00:56:34There's not a single person that you can get a hold of over there.
00:56:37That makes no sense to me.
00:56:39Yeah, I agree.
00:56:40All right.
00:56:40John Grayson, Scott Parks, and Sam Stevie III of the Dana and Parks Show out of Odyssey Station, KMBZ in
00:56:48Kansas City, weighed in on the Clancy case, too.
00:56:51Are you interested at all in the trial that's going on right now in Massachusetts?
00:56:55I find it fascinating.
00:56:57Yes, I find it fascinating.
00:56:58My wife is obsessed with this trial and has been going through and looking at every bit of commentary that's
00:57:07out there on the web.
00:57:08And people, I mean, if there is a more hated person in the country right now, not than her, than
00:57:15her husband, I don't know who it is.
00:57:18People hate this man like poison.
00:57:21Yeah, it's getting really, really ugly.
00:57:23But I don't know if you heard at the top of the hour, something interesting happened today because they broke
00:57:29for lunch and then never came back.
00:57:32The judge just said, unforeseen circumstances, we're sending everybody home.
00:57:35We'll see you tomorrow.
00:57:36Oh, that's weird.
00:57:37Yeah.
00:57:38See, I do not think that she, and I almost feel like I have to preface this by saying that,
00:57:48of course, what she did, and nobody's denying that she killed her three kids.
00:57:52Hmm, hmm, hmm, not so fast.
00:57:56There are.
00:57:56There is a conspiracy theory out there that he killed them.
00:58:00Okay.
00:58:02Sam, what have you done to John?
00:58:06I didn't say I believed it.
00:58:08I just said it's out there.
00:58:09Don't blame me.
00:58:10You're the one that's been working with me every day.
00:58:15I do not think she should go to prison for the rest of her life.
00:58:18I do think she should probably go to a mental detention facility for a very long time.
00:58:26You know, am I following it gavel to gavel?
00:58:29No.
00:58:29Am I keeping up on it?
00:58:31Hell, yes, I am.
00:58:32And because I do think that this is a very interesting story.
00:58:37But there is no doubt that she was sending people signals, I am not well.
00:58:42Oops, sorry.
00:58:43Yes.
00:58:43I just hit the microphone, beg your pardon.
00:58:45She was begging for help.
00:58:46Yes.
00:58:47And she was largely ignored.
00:58:48I'm thinking about doing harm to the kids.
00:58:51And, you know, mental health in this country, including postpartum depression, which I'm
00:58:59starting to really believe she had in a, they use an extra word on it.
00:59:06Psychosis.
00:59:07Yes.
00:59:10I'm starting to be convinced that she had the psychosis of postpartum depression.
00:59:16And she was begging for help.
00:59:19But, you know, with so many other different kinds of mental health issues, problems in
00:59:26this country, we are slow to get on this bandwagon and accept that, you know, that your brain
00:59:34is just like any other part of your body, except better and more important.
00:59:38And when something is not working up here or, you know, the wires are getting crossed, well,
00:59:44you know, suck it up, buttercup.
00:59:46You know, the depression is one of the most misunderstood things in this country.
00:59:52Absolutely.
00:59:53You know, I remember when Robin Williams died a handful of years ago and we ended up talking,
00:59:58he died literally at the tail end of one of our shows.
01:00:01And of course, we started talking about it right out of the gate at two o'clock the next
01:00:05day because it was Robin Williams and he had killed himself.
01:00:08Right.
01:00:09And I lost track of how many people would write in on the text line or call in on on
01:00:14the phone
01:00:14lines and say, what did he have to be depressed about?
01:00:17He had everything.
01:00:18He was famous.
01:00:19He was rich.
01:00:20It doesn't work like that.
01:00:22Right.
01:00:23No, no.
01:00:24It's it's not what do you have to be depressed about?
01:00:27You either are or you aren't.
01:00:28And if you are, there's very little outside of therapy and medication and things like that
01:00:33that you could do about it.
01:00:34So, yeah, the idea that, you know, he had all this money and all this fame, he should
01:00:38be happy.
01:00:39No, no, that's not how that works.
01:00:42Let me think about just very quickly and then we got to get to a really short break.
01:00:46But think about all the famous people that have killed themselves that people would say,
01:00:51well, what do you have to be depressed?
01:00:51I think about Brad Delp, the lead singer of Boston, Boston, yep, who killed himself by
01:00:57lighting a charcoal grill in his bathroom and closing the door.
01:01:03That's how he killed himself.
01:01:05People would say, what did Brad Delp have to be depressed about?
01:01:07He had everything.
01:01:08He was lead singer of Boston.
01:01:10He was rich because it doesn't work like that.
01:01:14It's that simple.
01:01:16Thank you so much for listening to this true crime roundup from the On Deadline podcast.
01:01:21This episode was written and produced by me, Lauren Berry.
01:01:25Special thanks to KDKA Radio in Pittsburgh, KYW Newsradio in Philadelphia, WWJ Newsradio in
01:01:34Detroit, WCCO News and Talk in the Twin Cities, Tommy Tucker out of WWL in New Orleans, the
01:01:43Dana and Parks Show out of KMBZ in Kansas City, KNX News in Los Angeles, WBEN News and Talk in
01:01:51Buffalo, the Chad Benson Show out of KRLD 1080 in Dallas, and the Mark Cox Morning Show out
01:01:59of KFTK in St. Louis.
01:02:01You can find these programs on the Odyssey app or wherever you find your podcasts.
01:02:07You can find these true crime roundups by subscribing to the On Deadline podcast, the Who Killed
01:02:14Strawberry podcast, or the Bitter Academia podcast, on the Odyssey app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Comments