Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 5 weeks ago
The prospect that all European nations could threaten to boycott the next World Cup has sent a strong signal through global football, sports governance, and international diplomacy.

Such a development would not only reshape the tournament itself, but also affect broadcasting rights, sponsorship contracts, qualification systems, and the credibility of FIFA on the world stage.
Transcript
00:00Gianni Infantino wants to sell a piece of FIFA to private investors.
00:04European football wants no part of it. That's the standoff right now.
00:09FIFA's president is pushing a plan to bring outside money into the World Cup itself.
00:14And the peoples who run football across Europe are openly talking about walking away from the
00:19tournament rather than let it happen. So let's get into what Infantino is actually proposing
00:24and why European nations are now putting a boycott on the table.
00:28Here's the situation. Days after the most watched World Cup ever wrapped up in North America,
00:35FIFA dropped a bombshell. Just days after staging the most lucrative World Cup in history,
00:39FIFA announced a new, and instantly controversial, plan to raise more money.
00:44Selling stakes in its marquee event to private investors for billions of dollars.
00:49The vehicle for this is a new company. FIFA wants to call it FIFA Forward Enterprise,
00:54or FFE for short. FFE would bring together the sale of FIFA's commercial rights,
01:00including broadcasting, sponsorship, ticketing and licensing, with the operational delivery of its
01:06tournaments. That means the World Cup. That means the Women's World Cup. That means the Club World Cup
01:12too. And here's the number that's got everyone talking. Under the proposal, FIFA would raise up to
01:184.2 billion from external investors through the sale of minority, non-controlling stakes in FFE.
01:25Which it says would be valued at around 20 billion. 20 billion dollars. That's the price tag FIFA has
01:32put on its own commercial machine. Now who wants in? Among the investor groups, Thrive Eternal stands out,
01:38led by Josh Kushner, who is linked to Donald Trump's family. To be specific about that connection,
01:44Josh Kushner is the brother of Jard Kushner, married to US President Donald Trump's daughter Ivanka.
01:50And FIFA isn't doing this alone on the finance side, either. FIFA has approached Josh Kushner's
01:56Thrive Capital as one of its prospective cornerstone investors, while JP Morgan is working with FIFA
02:02as a strategic partner on the project. So you've got the sitting FIFA president, a Wall Street bank,
02:07and a venture capital firm run by the brother-in-law of the sitting US president's daughter.
02:12All lining up around a piece of the World Cup, that's the setup. Now here's where it gets messy.
02:18Nobody outside FIFA's inner circle was supposed to find out about this the way they did. It's
02:24understood the Football Association was completely unaware of the plans before FIFA's rushed announcement.
02:30And FIFA did not raise the landmark strategy during meetings with football associations in New York
02:35on the eve of the World Cup final. In other words, Infantino sat in a room with the people who
02:40run
02:40football and said nothing about selling off a chunk of it, then dropped the news days later.
02:46UEFA didn't wait around to react quietly. The governing body of European football put out
02:51a statement that pulled no punches. It said plainly that this crosses a line that football's governing
02:57institutions should never cross. UEFA went further, saying it takes it extremely seriously,
03:02and so should every national football association. And so should every stakeholder.
03:07Lags, clubs, players, supporters, governments and everyone who cares about the future of the game.
03:13Then came the line that's been repeated everywhere. UEFA said the soul and governance of football,
03:19are not assets to trade. Especially with zero transparency, as to who gains financially.
03:24None of us are the owners of football, it is not FIFA's to sell. That's not a press release,
03:30written by lawyers trying to sound diplomatic. That's a governing body telling the head of world
03:35football, he's overstepped. And it didn't stop at words. Within hours, sources told multiple outlets
03:42that a boycott was now genuinely on the table. A meeting of the 55 European member associations
03:48is planned for this week. With UEFA accelerating efforts to hold an emergency meeting to discuss
03:53plans, including a potential World Cup boycott, to oppose the FIFA proposal. Sky Sports, which broke a lot
04:00of this reporting, confirmed the same thing from its own sources. UEFA nations are expected to hold an
04:06emergency meeting virtually this week. And there is a willingness to use the threat of a boycott,
04:11if FIFA President Gianni Infantino pushes ahead with the plans. So that's the shape of it, 55 countries,
04:18one emergency call. One word on the table that hasn't been seriously floated at this scale,
04:23in years, boycott. Every one of Europe's national federations, from the biggest to the smallest,
04:28is being pulled into a conversation about whether to simply not show up.
04:32FIFA, for its part, isn't backing down. Infantino framed the whole thing not as a sell-off,
04:38but as a gift to the game. In FIFA's own statement, he said this is about the democratization of football
04:44worldwide. The pitch is that money raised from investors would flow back down to the 211 member
04:50federations, including the ones with almost nothing in the bank. But UEFA isn't buying the framing.
04:56And that's the fight now sitting on the table heading into this week's meeting. A fight that
05:01could determine whether the biggest countries in world football show up to the next tournament at
05:06all. To understand why European federations are this angry, you have to look past the statement
05:12and into the mechanics of what Infantino is actually offering up for sale. Because it's not just a slice of
05:18TV revenue. It's a slice of the tournament's control structure. Under the plan being reported,
05:24member nations would have the freedom to keep or sell their stakes in the World Cup corporation
05:29at their will under the Infantino plan. Read that again. Individual countries,
05:34the actual federations that run national teams, would be handed a stake in this new company and
05:40then be free to cash that stake out. That detail is what's turning heads. Because it's not a hypothetical
05:46for every country. $20 million is a pittance for the richest nations competing in global soccer.
05:53But for the dozens of nations dealing with budgetary issues, it would enable them to sell
05:58out of the World Cup in desperation. Putting their stakes in the hands of private ownership.
06:03Sit with that for a second. FIFA has 211 member federations. Most of them are not the Germanys,
06:10Englands, or Francis of the world. Most are small federations running on shoestring budgets. Some
06:16barely able to fund youth programs or pay travel costs for national team camps. If you dangle a
06:22payout in front of a federation that's underwater, the incentive to take the cash and sell out isn't
06:28hard to picture. And that's exactly the scenario critics are pointing to. It's easy to envision a
06:33scenario where enough FIFA member countries sell their shares for profit to a point where the
06:38controlling interest of the World Cup is no longer under the control of a true democratic body,
06:43but private equity. That's the nightmare version European officials are describing behind closed
06:49doors. A World Cup where the majority owner, over time, isn't a collection of national federations
06:55answerable to their football communities, but a fund answerable to shareholders. Now let's talk numbers,
07:01because FIFA has been specific about what it's offering to sweeten this deal
07:05for the federations who might otherwise object. FIFA's pitch involves a big jump in the money
07:10handed out through what it's calling the FIFA Fast Forward Program. FIFA's statement led on how much
07:16money each of its 211 members could get through 2038, moving instead of the currently promised $8
07:22million each in development funds through the 2027-30 cycle. Up to $20 million, then $22 million,
07:30and $24 million in the following cycles. So the offer on the table for a small federation is roughly
07:37two and a half times what they're currently guaranteed. That's real money for a country
07:42that might be building a single training pitch, or trying to keep its women's program funded.
07:47It's not hard to see why some federations might be tempted to say yes regardless of what UEFA is
07:52telling Europe to do. But who actually gets to green light this? It's not a unilateral call by Infantino,
07:59at least on paper. The proposal is subject to approval by a majority of those national
08:04associations and FIFA's 37-member council. Meaning this whole plan needs votes. It needs
08:11the buy-in of federations, the same federations FIFA is dangling bigger checks in front of.
08:16That's the real battlefield here. It's not just UEFA versus Infantino. It's Europe's wealthier
08:23federations who don't need the extra cash as badly and who have the platform to make noise.
08:28Going up against a majority vote system where dozens of smaller nations might see the offer
08:33as too good to refuse. There's also the matter of what Infantino personally stands to gain,
08:39which hasn't gone unnoticed. Reports out of the negotiations describe an arrangement where he
08:44wouldn't just walk away after his presidency ends. Infantino would reportedly run the company
08:49as its commissioner after his term as FIFA president ends in 2031. With a salary likely on par with
08:56NFL commissioner Roger Goodells, who makes about $64 million a year. That's the piece that's landing
09:03hardest with critics. This isn't just Infantino brokering a deal for FIFA's future. It's a structure
09:09where he potentially steps out of an elected presidency and into a highly paid corporate
09:14commissioner role, overseeing the very asset he just helped privatize. And this isn't the first time
09:19Infantino has tried something like this. He's been here before. It's not the first time Infantino
09:26has attempted to bring private investors into the game. In 2018, he tried to reach a $25 billion deal
09:33with Japanese bank SoftBank and Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund to reportedly create new
09:39international soccer events. But that deal eventually fell through due to lack of support. Back then,
09:45the FIFA council itself blocked it. The council reviewed the offer and decided there wasn't
09:50enough information to move forward, effectively killing the deal before it got off the ground.
09:55So this isn't a new impulse for Infantino. It's the third or fourth attempt in less than a decade
10:00to bring outside capital into football's biggest events. What's different this time is that the deal
10:05has actually reached the confirmation stage, with a named bank, a named investor, and a specific
10:11valuation attached. That history matters because it tells European federations something important.
10:17This pattern doesn't stop just because it gets pushed back once. It comes back dressed up differently
10:22a few years later. And that's part of why the anger this time feels less like a one-off flare
10:28-up,
10:28and more like a federation-wide reckoning with how FIFA's leadership operates.
10:32Now let's talk about the piece of this story that's impossible to separate from everything else.
10:37The political relationship sitting right in the middle of the deal. This isn't the first time
10:42Infantino's closeness with the American president has drawn scrutiny. It's been building for months,
10:48visible in plain sight at the tournament itself. A key figure in brokering these deals is President
10:53Donald Trump, whom Infantino cozied up to during the 2026 World Cup by presenting him with the inaugural
11:00FIFA Peace Prize and then sitting next to the president at games he attended. That image,
11:05the sitting FIFA president, handing an award to the sitting US president in the middle of a World Cup,
11:10was already generating conversation before any of this privatization news broke.
11:15Then came the final itself. FIFA President Gianni Infantino and President Donald J. Trump
11:21presented the trophy to Spain's Rodri after the World Cup final soccer match between Spain and Argentina
11:27in East Rutherford, New Jersey. So by the time the FFE plan surfaced, the optics were already primed.
11:34Infantino and Trump had spent the entire tournament photographed side by side. And now the investment
11:40group lined up to buy into FIFA's new commercial arm happens to run through Trump's own extended family.
11:46To be precise about who's involved and who isn't, because there's been some confusion in the reporting.
11:52Kushner would purchase a stake in the World Cup through Thrive Capital, a venture capital firm.
11:57And Kushner is the brother of US President Donald Trump's son-in-law Jarred Kushner. It's Josh Kushner
12:04doing the investing, not Jarred directly, but the family tie to the White House is exactly the same
12:09either way. And in case anyone thought the Trump administration was in the dark about any of this,
12:15the Trump administration is reportedly aware of Infantino's plan. That detail alone would be enough
12:22to make European federations nervous. But there's more. According to further reporting on how this
12:28deal came together, FIFA reportedly consulted with the Trump administration on the plans,
12:33two sources told the Times. Consulted not just aware, consulted. That word choice matters, it suggests.
12:39The White House wasn't simply informed after the fact, but had some level of input as FIFA shaped this
12:46plan. Now, to be fair to the reporting, there's been at least one correction worth noting. Jarred Kushner,
12:52the president's son-in-law and older brother of the Thrive Capital founder, is not one of the
12:57investors lined up. Meaning it's specifically Josh, not Jarred himself, putting money on the table.
13:03But try explaining that nuance to a UEFA delegate, sitting in an emergency call this week. The family
13:09name attached to the money is the same family name that's been standing next to Infantino on a podium.
13:15For the better part of a month's, this has all landed against a backdrop where Infantino's
13:21relationship with the American right has already been a sore point across parts of Europe.
13:26Well before this specific deal surfaced, just months before the tournament, a vice president
13:32of Germany's own football federation was pushing his organization to think about walking away from
13:37the World Cup entirely over concerns tied to the American political climate. The DFB executive
13:44committee met, and discussed the option of a boycott of the tournament. A consideration first
13:49proposed by DFB vice president Oak Gottlich, who referred to Trump's recent actions and statements,
13:55and said it was time to seriously consider a boycott. Germany's federation ultimately overruled him,
14:02and said publicly, that it believes in the unifying power of sport, and the global impact that a FIFA
14:08World Cup can have. Adding that its goal is to strengthen this positive force, not to prevent it.
14:13They even pushed back on Gottlich directly, saying debates on sports policy should be conducted
14:19internally and not in public. So months before FFE was even announced, there was already a live fault
14:25line inside one of Europe's biggest federations about whether to boycott a Trump-adjacent World Cup.
14:31That tension didn't disappear once the tournament ended, it just found a new trigger. Now it's not
14:37about politics in the abstract, it's about a specific financial structure, with a specific investor,
14:43whose family sat courtside with Trump for the final. There's also the matter of how FIFA's finances
14:49have looked lately, which adds fuel to why people are questioning the need for outside investors at
14:54all. FIFA isn't hurting for cash. FIFA is already set to bring in at least $13 billion from the past
15:01four-year cycle. The bulk of it from its marquee men's tournament. $13 billion, and that's before
15:07this new company even exists. Which raises the obvious question being whispered across European
15:13federations right now. If FIFA is already pulling in that kind of money, why does it need private equity
15:19at all? Unless the real prize isn't the cash itself, but who gets a seat at the table once it's
15:24in.
15:25With the politics and the money laid out, the next fight is happening. Inside the institutions
15:30themselves, and it's bigger than just UEFA's press office. Start with the players, this isn't the
15:35first time football's labor side has clashed with Infantino's leadership style. And that history is
15:41worth understanding because it shapes how seriously people are taking this new threat. Just last year,
15:48the Global Players Union came out swinging. After the inaugural Expanded Club World Cup, FIFPRO said
15:54bluntly that football needs responsible leadership, not emperors. After a meeting of 58 national player
16:01unions, responded to FIFA pursuing its agenda with unofficial player representatives. The union went
16:07further, saying its members' rights are being seriously undermined by commercial policies imposed
16:13by its autocratic system of governance. They called the entire approach a model that puts the health of
16:19players at risk and sidelines those at the heart of the game. Adding it was unacceptable for an organization
16:25that claims global leadership to turn a blind eye to the basic needs of the players. FIFA's response at the
16:32time wasn't exactly conciliatory either. The organization said it was extremely disappointed
16:38by the increasingly divisive and contradictory tone adopted by FIFPRO leadership. That fight over player
16:45welfare never really got resolved. FIFPRO Europe and a group of European legs filed a legal complaint.
16:52With the European Union accusing FIFA of abusing its dominant position in football. And violating
16:58European competition law by expanding the international match calendar. Without proper consultation,
17:04and a verdict has yet to be reached. So heading into this privatization fight, FIFA already had an open
17:10legal complaint. Hanging over it in Europe, plus a player union that had already labelled. Its leadership
17:16style as something closer to an autocracy than a democracy. None of that context makes UEFA's reaction
17:23to FFE look like an overreaction. It looks like the latest entry in a pattern that's been building for
17:29well over a year. Now to the governing bodies specifically. UEFA represents 55 national federations. Across Europe,
17:36everyone from the giants like Germany, France, Spain, England, and Italy. Down to tiny federations,
17:42most casual fans couldn't place on a map. Getting all 55 to agree on anything is historically difficult.
17:50Getting them to agree on the nuclear option, walking away from the sport's biggest stage,
17:54is close to unprecedented. But the emergency meeting being called this week isn't just a formality. Reporting
18:02from inside the process, describes real momentum behind. At least discussing the boycott options
18:07seriously, rather than just using it as a rhetorical threat. UEFA is accelerating efforts to hold an
18:13emergency meeting of its 55 member associations. This week to discuss plans, including a potential
18:20World Cup boycott. To oppose a FIFA proposal, to raise $20 billion from a sale of equity. To outside
18:27investors, and UEFA's public language has been consistent. Across every outlet reporting this
18:33story, not softened, not walked back. Repeated the same way statement after statement. The line about
18:39football's soul not being for sale, has been the anchor point in nearly every piece of coverage.
18:45It's rare to see an institution stick that closely to one message without hedging. Which suggests this
18:50isn't a knee-jerk quote from a press officer. It's a coordinated position that European federations
18:56have already agreed on. Before the emergency call even happens. It's worth remembering too, that
19:03boycotts have been floated before in football's history. And mostly fizzled, back in 2015, in the
19:09middle of FIFA's corruption scandal. Under Sepp Blatter, there was a similar moment. Where England's
19:14federation chief said he'd support a UEFA-led boycott. But Germany's federation chief at the time
19:20flatly rejected the idea, saying plainly. We don't want to go down the route of a boycott. And warning
19:26that it wouldn't accomplish anything, that boycott talk went nowhere. The 2018 World Cup happened in
19:32Russia as scheduled, corruption scandal and all. That history is exactly why this moment feels
19:38different. To people who have been watching FIFA politics for a while. Back in 2015, the trigger was
19:44corruption arrests, serious, but abstract to most fans. This time, the trigger is something federations
19:50can point to directly. A specific company, a specific valuation, a specific investor. With a
19:56name attached to the current American president's family. It's concrete in a way the 2015 crisis wasn't.
20:03And that concreteness is what's making the boycott conversation harder to laugh off this time around.
20:08There's also the matter of timing that's making things worse for Infantino. This didn't emerge in
20:14some quiet off-season lull, where FIFA could control the story. It landed just days after staging the
20:20most lucrative World Cup in history. While goodwill from the tournament was still fresh. While
20:25federations were still sorting out their own post-tournament finances. And while the world's
20:30attention was still on football. Dropping a $20 billion privatization plan into that window,
20:36without warning. The very federations whose votes it needs, is the kind of move that reads less like
20:42strategy. And more like an organization that assumed nobody would push back hard enough to matter.
20:48So where does this actually go from here? The emergency meeting is the next real checkpoint.
20:5355 European federations, meeting virtually, working out whether to formalize the boycott threat into an
20:59actual united position, or whether cooler heads inside UEFA. Decide a threat alone is enough leverage,
21:06without ever needing to follow through. Based on how this has unfolded so far,
21:11the speed of the statement. The consistency of the language, the fact that the FA itself says it was
21:16blindsided. There's real reason to think Europe isn't bluffing this time. But it's worth being
21:21honest about the mechanics standing in the way of an actual boycott happening. The proposal is subject
21:27to approval, by a majority of those national associations. And FIFA's 37-member council, that means
21:34Infantino doesn't need Europe's blessing. To pass this, he needs a majority across all 211 federations.
21:41And as we covered, the financial incentive being dangled in front of smaller,
21:45cash-strapped nations is real money, that could swing plenty of votes. Even if every single European
21:51federation votes no. That's the tension sitting at the center of this whole standoff. Europe has the
21:57loudest voice, the richest federations, and the biggest television audiences. But numerically, Europe is
22:03still just 55 votes out of 211. If Infantino can lock down enough of the smaller federations with
22:10bigger development checks. He could theoretically pass FFE, even with every major European nation
22:16voting against it. And threatening to sit out the tournament entirely. Which raises the real question,
22:23hanging over this entire saga. Would Europe actually follow through on a boycott, if the vote doesn't go
22:28their way. Because history, as we saw with the 2015 standoff, suggests threats like this have fizzled
22:34before. Germany's federation, the same one now furious about FFE, was the same federation that
22:41killed the boycott momentum, a decade ago. By refusing to go along with it, whether that same
22:46hesitation shows up again. Once the emergency meeting actually happens, is something nobody can answer yet.
22:53What's different this time though, is the money involved and who's attached to it. A corruption
22:58scandal, is something federations can wait out. Arrests happen, officials get replaced,
23:03the tournament goes on. A structural change to who owns a piece of the World Cup, itself doesn't wait
23:09out. Once federations start selling their stakes, once a private equity structure is baked into.
23:15How the tournament is run, there's no simple reversal. That's part of why this feels less like
23:20a passing headline. And more like a fight that's going to define the next several years,
23:25of how international football is governed. FIFA for now is sticking to its script,
23:30that this is about funding growth. For the federations that need it most,
23:34that private investors would only hold minority, non-controlling stakes, and that the whole process
23:39is still just in a consultation phase. Whether that consultation ends in a genuinely negotiated compromise,
23:46or in Europe walking out of the room entirely, is the story that's only just getting started.
23:52The emergency meeting hasn't even happened yet, the vote hasn't been scheduled. And the World Cup
23:57Infantino, is selling a piece of isn't even the next one on the calendar. It's the tournament in
24:02Brazil, and everything that comes after it. For now, all anyone in football can do is wait for that call
24:08this week. And see whether 55 angry federations turn their statement into something FIFA can't simply wait
24:15out. Sky Sports UEFA hits out at FIFA and Gianni Infantino. Yahoo Sports is a World Cup boycott brewing.
24:22Gadeo European nations discussing World Cup boycott. ESPN UEFA to discuss World Cup boycott. Forbes
24:30European teams considering FIFA World Cup boycott. Yahoo Sports FIFA president planning to sell steak,
24:37including Joshua Kushner. Yahoo Sports FIFA president aims to sell the World Cup to Trump family associates.
24:43CBS Sports FIFA wants to sell World Cup steak to private investors. NPR FIFA has a new plan to raise
24:51billions. Euronews UEFA issues angry response. Spectrum News UEFA furious over FIFA plan for Kushner-backed
24:59company. CNN FIFA plan for Kushner-backed operation. ABC News FIFA plan meets fury from Europe's UEFA. NBC New
25:08New York FIFA plan for Kushner-backed operation. Al Jazeera German Football Federation rules out World
25:14Cup boycott to oppose Trump. Al Jazeera players hit back at FIFA and Infantino. ESPN FIFPRO not invited to
25:22FIFA player welfare meeting. BBC head of German FA opposes World Cup 2018 boycott. HTTPS
25:29slash slash feeds. BBC I. Co. UK slash sports slash zero slash football slash 32,979,956.

Recommended