Skip to playerSkip to main content
Defense lawyer Justin Nicol Gular called the prosecution’s visuals “misleading, unreliable, and misrepresentative,” saying some data showed “no dividends declared” instead of “no AFS filed,” as stated by the witness.

Gular said the visuals misrepresented the records and moved to have them stricken from the record, arguing that they had already been shown to the public and could unfairly affect Vice President Sara Duterte.

However, the prosecution panel, Atty. Erwin Matib denied the accusation, saying the defense’s allegations were serious. He argued that the prosecution did not misrepresent the records because they did not proceed with flashing the visuals after Presiding Officer Chiz Escudero sought clarification.

Escudero later overruled the defense’s objection to striking the visuals from the record. (Video courtesy of Senate of the Philippines)

Subscribe to the Manila Bulletin Online channel! -
https://www.youtube.com/TheManilaBulletin

Visit our website at http://mb.com.ph
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/manilabulletin
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/manila_bulletin
Instagram: https://instagram.com/manilabulletin
Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@manilabulletin

#VPSaraOnTrial
#ManilaBulletinOnline
#ManilaBulletin
#LatestNews

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00This is precisely why we are now moving to strike, Your Honor.
00:03Given the admissions of the witness upon the inquiry of the presiding officer,
00:09it is now clear upon us all that the visuals being presented or used by the prosecution
00:15was not only misleading, was not only unreliable,
00:21but it was misrepresentative of the records identified by the witness, Your Honor.
00:25This is unfair, Your Honor, to the respondent vice president
00:29because in the first place, those visuals had already been flashed to the general public
00:35who are listening to us.
00:37And secondly, Your Honor, the answers propounded by the witness and the questions,
00:42rather the questions propounded by the counsel and the witness answers thereto
00:47have already been heard, Your Honor.
00:48But it is already clear now that these were inaccurate and misrepresentative, Your Honor.
00:52We therefore, with the court's kind indulgence, move that the visuals as well as
00:58the questions pertaining to those inaccurate statements be stricken off the record, Your Honor.
01:03Your Honor, may I respond to that considering that the accusations are very heavy.
01:08Hindi po kami nag-misrepresent, Your Honor.
01:11And besides, hindi po namin itinulo yung pagka-flash.
01:14After ng clarification po ng presiding officer,
01:16malinaw po ang sabi po ng witness kanina,
01:19ang pinagbabasehan nila para sabihin na no dividend declaration ay dalawa,
01:23general information sheets at ang audited financial statements.
01:27So necessarily, kung wala pong AFS na sinabit,
01:30wala po silang mapagkukuhanan ng information na yun.
01:33And besides, again, hindi po namin itinulo yung prop
01:37and so far, accurate naman po yung mga nauna
01:39dahil ang basihan po nung presentation na yun,
01:42sorry, I withdraw the prop,
01:43ay base po sa mga kumpanyang may general information sheets
01:47at may audited financial statements.
01:50Nagpakita po kami ng example kanina ng GIS
01:52kung saan po makikita yung information na dapat paglagyan
01:56kung merong dividends, whether it be cash, stock, and property.
02:01So kung hindi lang po audited financial statements
02:05ang pinagbabasehan ng kumpanya,
02:07required po sila na ilagay sa general information sheet
02:11ang kanilang dineklarang dividends.
02:14At hindi lang po yun,
02:15kailangan po nilang ispecify ano yung uri ng dividends
02:21na minigay, whether it's stock, cash, or property.
02:25Your Honor, just a quick rejoinder.
02:27A quick rejoinder, just in before my ruling.
02:29The principle behind the defense objection is simple.
02:32It is fairness and accuracy and propriety, Your Honor.
02:36Now, in the presentation,
02:38it clearly stated that no dividends declared,
02:41when in fact, what the witness said
02:44upon the inquiry of the presiding officer
02:48is that there is no information
02:49since there was no document submitted.
02:52We just ask for fairness, Your Honor.
02:53It is nothing special.
02:54We ask the court to rule.
02:57Court will make a ruling.
03:00Through the presiding officer,
03:02clarification was made as regards
03:04the no dividend declaration
03:06with respect to the companies
03:07that did not file an AFS
03:09or audited financial statements.
03:12Unfortunately, Attorney Justin,
03:14I cannot strike from the records
03:16an illustration or audiovisual presentation
03:19because it's not in the records.
03:22And it was not submitted in evidence as well.
03:25But given the chair's clarification
03:28with the questions propounded directly to the witness,
03:30I think it should suffice to clarify
03:34that the other corporations did not submit an AFS
03:40and therefore the witness would not have known
03:42if dividends were declared.
03:44However, with respect to the other corporations,
03:47the witness indeed testified
03:48that the submissions did not declare any dividends
03:52based on their GIS and AFS.
03:55For those reasons,
03:56Chair would have to overrule your objection,
03:58I'm just saying.
03:59But we'll note, I presume,
04:01your objection on the matter just the same.
Comments

Recommended