Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 29 minutes ago
A political controversy has erupted following remarks by Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy comparing Bhagwan Ram and Bhagwan Shiv. Speaking in New Delhi, the Chief Minister drew contrasts between North and South India, claiming that people in the south are devotees of Shiva while those in the north worship Lord Ram. He further asserted that Shiva is the god of the poor, whereas Ram is the god of the rich, and accused the Bharatiya Janata Party of appropriating Lord Ram while failing to chant Har Har Mahadev. The Bharatiya Janata Party strongly rejected the claims, accusing him of employing divide-and-rule tactics and creating geographic and political divides among Hindus. Leaders pointed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's frequent visits to prominent Shiva shrines, including Kashi Vishwanath, Mahakal in Ujjain, Somnath, Kedarnath, and Pashupatinath, along with major corridor redevelopments, arguing that both deities are revered across India.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00And there is now a fresh political storm over a statement made by Telangana Chief Minister
00:06Revant Reddy. His remarks on Maryada Purushottam Shri Ram and Bhagwan Shiv.
00:13So, Revant Reddy was speaking in the national capital. He sought to draw a parallel and perhaps
00:20draw a regional contrast between Bhagwan Ram and Bhagwan Shiv. He said, and I quote,
00:27We are Drevidans. People here in the north are Aryans. We are devotees of Shiva. They are
00:36devotees of Lord Ram. Revant Reddy then went on to accuse the BJP of stealing Lord Ram and
00:44questioned why Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Bharatiya Janata Party leaders did not
00:50chant Har Har Mahadev and only Jai Shri Ram. And then came what the BJP describes as the
00:59most controversial part of his remark. Revant Reddy said words to the effect, Shiva is the
01:05God of the poor. Ram is the God of the rich. BJP is the party of the rich. But is
01:14there
01:14any evidence whatsoever or any merit whatsoever in what Revant Reddy claimed? I want you to
01:23look at some of the visuals on your television screens right now. Now, these are all images
01:29of Prime Minister Narendra Modi visiting various temples of Bhagwan Shiv in the past five years from
01:38Kashi Vishwanath, that's his parliamentary constituency Varanasi, to Mahakal in Ujjain, to Somnath in
01:47Gujarat. He's also visited Pashupatinath Temple in Kathmandu in Nepal. The BJP has hit right back at
01:55Revant Reddy accusing the Telangana Chief Minister of trying to divide and food, trying to create
02:02political and geographical divides in India and a divide between followers of Maryadhapurshottam
02:10Shri Ram and Bhagwan Shiv. There is no divide. Minister of State for Home, Bandhi Sanjay Kumar,
02:16he said Revant Reddy was attempting to draw political boundaries between two deities that every Hindu
02:23worship. And this is not the first time Congress and its leaders have been in the line of fire or
02:29have
02:29faced questions over their position on Hindu deities. For example, in May 2025, leader of opposition in
02:38Lok Sabha and Congress Party, senior leader Rahul Gandhi, former party president, he was speaking at Brown
02:43University. He referred to Maryadhapurshottam Shri Ram as a mythological figure while explaining his idea
02:51of Hinduism. Then came the Congress decision to stay away from the January 2024 Pran Pratishtha
02:58ceremony at the Divya Bhavya Dennavya Shri Ram Temple at Ayodhya. Sonia Gandhi, Malik Arjun Karge, Adhiranjan
03:06Choudhury reports said they declined the invitation. The Congress said the ceremony had been turned into
03:11an RSS BJV event and the temple was being inaugurated ahead of its completion just for electoral gains.
03:21Months earlier, December 2023, Congress leader Sam Petrodha, he questioned the significance being
03:28attached to the Divya Bhavya Ram Mandir at Ayodhya. He asked whether the Ram Mandir was the real issue.
03:33He pointed to issues like unemployment, inflation, state of economy. Let me take you back to October
03:412018. Congress leader Shashi Tharoor said, while a vast majority of Hindus believe that Ayodhya was the
03:49birthplace of Lord Ram, no good Hindu would want a temple built by demolishing somebody else's
03:56place of worship. And then of course, you'd recall the 2007 Sri Ram Sethu controversy. During the UPI
04:05government's tenure, an affidavit was filed in the Supreme Court, which raised questions about the
04:12historical or even any evidence whatsoever of the existence of either Lord Ram or the Ram Sethu.
04:20The center, after a huge furor, nationwide furor, it withdrew the controversial parts of that
04:28affidavit, which seemed to suggest that there was no evidence of Lord Ram or words to the effect that
04:33he was just a mythological character. The BJP has also pointed to their efforts to improve
04:39infrastructure, their efforts at improving infrastructure across temple towns. Kashi Vishwana
04:43Dham corridor, for example, that was inaugurated in December 2021, expanded the temple area, improved
04:50access between the temple and Maganga, the river flowing in Kashi. They also point to Mahakarlok in
04:58Ujjain, where the first phase was dedicated to the nation in 2022. That was a project cost of about
05:04850 crore rupees and major redevelopment of pilgrimage centers across the country. The government
05:11also cites the Kedarnath redevelopment project, as well as the development work being undertaken
05:16at the Somnath Temple as part of a broader push to upgrade temple tourism or pilgrimage
05:24infrastructure and heritage sites of the Sanatana Dharma. So tonight, that larger political question
05:31is not simply Revant Reddy raising an issue about Lord Ram versus Lord Shiva. It's about whether India's
05:38gods, India's traditions should themselves become political fault claims. North versus South,
05:44rich versus poor, Ram versus Shiva. The British use divide and rule, is divide and rule being
05:53brought in once again. We debate that larger controversy.

Recommended