Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 1 minute ago
Finding something valuable doesn’t necessarily mean you get to keep it — and Judge Judy has a $4,000 example ready to make the point.

Judge Judy Sheindlin walks an evasive defendant through the legal concept of larceny using a hypothetical lost engagement ring. Once you know who owns what you found and deliberately keep it anyway, she explains, the situation looks very different.
Watch Judge Judy for more memorable courtroom lessons and rulings.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:00It's a larceny.
00:01Well, I didn't...
00:01I don't care if it's a well.
00:03I didn't larceny anything.
00:03You're not a lawyer.
00:04Are you a lawyer?
00:05I cleaned up my yard.
00:05I don't...
00:06Are you a lawyer?
00:07No, ma'am.
00:08I'm telling you, it's a larceny.
00:09It's the same thing.
00:10Let's say it wasn't a basketball,
00:12and it was a four-carat engagement ring
00:15that you found on your lawn.
00:16Yes, ma'am.
00:17And you took it, and you took it inside.
00:19And the person...
00:20Gee, I know I dropped it.
00:22It had to be here.
00:23Came up, knocked at your door, and said,
00:24do you have my four-carat engagement ring?
00:27And you said, yes, I do.
00:28It was on my lawn,
00:30and you can't have it back.
00:31But I had several balls.
00:32I don't care.
00:34I mean, a four-carat ring is totally different
00:35than several balls.
00:37You're playing with me.

Recommended