Passer au playerPasser au contenu principal
À l’occasion de la journée mondiale de la liberté la presse, Stella Morris, avocate et compagne de Julian Assange, alerte sur les menaces que font peser les poursuites contre le journaliste sur la liberté de la presse.

Détenu à Londres depuis 3 ans pour avoir révélé les crimes de guerre commis en Afghanistan et en Irak par les armées américaine et britannique, le fondateur de Wikileaks pourrait être extradé vers les États-Unis, si le ministère de l’Intérieur britannique tranche en faveur de son extradition. Accusé d’espionnage par les États-Unis, le journaliste australien risque une peine de 175 ans de prison sur le sol américain.

Une telle décision aurait un effet dévastateur sur la liberté de la presse dans le monde et en Europe, craint Stella Morris, avocate et compagne de Julian Assange.

En cas de décision en faveur de l'extradition, l'avocate assure que la défense portera l'affaire devant la Cour Suprême britannique, puis, en ultime recours devant la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme en cas de nouvelle défaite.

📣 SUIVEZ L'HUMANITÉ
Retrouvez tous nos articles sur 👉 https://www.humanite.fr/
Notre page Facebook 👉 https://fr-fr.facebook.com/humanite.fr/
L'Humanité est aussi sur Twitter 👉 https://twitter.com/humanite_fr #assange

Catégorie

🗞
News
Transcription
00:00The treatment of Julian is just so cruel and inhumane.
00:04Now it's been three years in Belmarsh prison, he's not serving a sentence,
00:08he's just there because the U.S. wants him extradited and the U.K. is playing along.
00:13After the extradition order was issued, Russia and China seized on it
00:18in order to talk about Western hypocrisy and how the West, the U.K. and the U.S.,
00:27they don't have no moral high ground to talk about China or Russia and so on.
00:32And what is the effect of this?
00:34Basically, we all lose from this kind of thing because for those governments,
00:40it just is a license for them to do the same thing to their dissidents and their journalists.
00:48If Julian doesn't succeed winning this case at the European Court of Human Rights,
00:53it will fundamentally change the scope of press freedoms because, as you know,
01:00Julian is not a U.S. citizen.
01:02He was not working from the United States.
01:03He was working in Europe.
01:07WikiLeaks publishes from France.
01:09WikiLeaks is a European publisher.
01:12This is not something that is going on between the U.K. and the U.S.
01:17and there are also people who have worked or are working for WikiLeaks who are Europeans
01:26residing in European countries and who are obviously at risk of also being extradited
01:31and prosecuted alongside Julian.
01:34So this is an enormously important case.
01:38It's what's been playing out in the U.K. courts and the U.S. courts will determine the scope
01:44of press freedom and ultimately democratic freedoms in Europe.
01:48It changes the rules of the game in terms of the ability to report on foreign countries,
01:57foreign powers committing war crimes.
02:00And if we can all agree that war crimes are always wrong and should be prosecuted and the
02:08journalists should have the ability to expose war crimes without being put in prison, then
02:14it follows that Julian should never be extradited to the United States because just like there
02:20are war crimes, for example, in Ukraine or in other parts of the world that should obviously
02:27be investigated and prosecuted, the United States is not impugned.
02:32And if a journalist has the courage and the conviction to publish evidence of war crime, then
02:43of course, they should be protected.
02:45And the European continent, through the European Court of Human Rights, has the ability to block
02:53this extradition.
02:54Ultimately, Europe can save Julian and must save Julian.
03:01And France, of course, is a central player.

Recommandations