Skip to playerSkip to main content
Senator Josh Hawley questions Missouri judicial nominee Asetti over past comments expressing skepticism toward voter ID laws during a Senate confirmation hearing. The nominee, who made those statements as a 25-year-old law student in 2016, says their views have since evolved. Now serving as general counsel for the Missouri Secretary of State’s office, the nominee has defended voter ID legislation in court, describing voter identification as a common-sense measure rather than a poll tax. The hearing also examines the nominee’s judicial philosophy, including their commitment to originalism and textualism, as questions emerge over past statements, legal positions, and qualifications for the federal bench.

#JoshHawley #MissouriJudicialNominee #JudicialConfirmation #VoterID #VoterIDLaws #MissouriPolitics #SenateHearing #JudicialNomination #ElectionIntegrity #VoterIdentification #Originalism #Textualism #USSenate #MissouriNews #PoliticalNews #BreakingNews #FederalJudiciary #JudicialHearing #VotingRights #ElectionLaws

~HT.318~PR.460~GR.506~VG.HM~

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Congratulations to the nominees. Thank you for being here. It's great, Mr. Ossetti, to
00:05see you and to see another Missourian on this panel. I think this will be number, I think, sixth district
00:11court nominee that President Trump has gotten to appoint out of the state of Missouri in the last year and
00:15a half, so that's a pretty good record.
00:18And you have such a strong advocate in former Attorney General John Ashcroft, who is a big believer in you.
00:26So he and I have had, he must have called me 15 times about your nomination. So anyway, he's, as
00:32I said to him when I talked to him on the phone, I said, John, anybody who you're for, I'm
00:36for. So anyway, he's a great man, and it's great to see that you've got his support.
00:42I just want to give you a chance to follow up on what Senator Durbin was asking you about a
00:46second ago, this article, and Senator Kennedy asked you about it, too. This article you wrote, were you in law
00:53school back in 2016, is that right, thereabouts?
00:56I was a 25-year-old law student, yes.
00:58And about Shelby County, and you said you disagreed with Shelby County. That's a decision written by my old boss
01:04at the Supreme Court. And at the time, you said you disagreed with it, and you didn't, you don't like
01:09voter ID, or you didn't like voter ID. But I think that, I thought I heard you say to Senator
01:14Durbin that your views have changed. Is that fair to say?
01:18That's correct, and I've litigated extensive matters defending voter ID laws like HB 1878 in 2022, when I was general
01:24counsel for the Secretary of State's office.
01:26Yeah, in Missouri. Because we have a voter ID law, a very strong one in the state of Missouri, and
01:32you've litigated in defense of that.
01:35Yes.
01:35Yeah. And so you mentioned poll taxes to Senator Kennedy, and you mentioned those in the article, but I just
01:42want to be clear, you're not comparing, your view now is you're not comparing voter ID to poll taxes. I
01:49mean, you think as a matter of law, those things are not equivalent.
01:51No, they're not. All I was explaining in that point, Senator, is that some of the opponents of voter ID
01:58today and some of the arguments they've made in court is to try to go back to, you know, some
02:03of the measures that were racially discriminatory and now outlawed, obviously, through constitutional amendments and trying to make comparisons.
02:10And, of course, that comparison doesn't hold water. Voter ID is a common sense election integrity measure, and I've had
02:15the honor of defending voter ID laws, both in federal court and in state court in Missouri.
02:20Good. Okay, good. I'm glad we got that cleared up. Let me give you a chance to clear up something
02:25else some pro-life folks in the state have raised.
02:28You said to Senator Kennedy you worked at Bryan Cave, a great Missouri law firm. I'm aware that Bryan Cave,
02:36as a matter of public record, represented a transgender clinic called Southampton Community Healthcare back some years ago, and I
02:46guess maybe you were there at the time at the firm, but you didn't represent that clinic. Is that correct,
02:51Mr. Osei?
02:51That's correct, Senator. I was an associate, and it was a client of the firm that other partners handled.
02:58Yeah, so I think they ended up suing the Attorney General, Andrew Bailey, I think maybe you worked for it
03:04for a while, to try to stop state regulations preventing transgender surgeries for minors, which I'm 100% in favor
03:12of those regulations.
03:14But that was, you were not involved, I just want to be real clear about this, you were not involved
03:19at all in that litigation, correct?
03:21No, Senator, on the merits of that litigation, no.
03:23Great. Anything else, Mr. Osei, you'd like to say about your judicial philosophy? Maybe you want to talk about something
03:33you learned from General Ashcroft, but talk about how you'd approach the job, and what your approach is to statutory
03:40interpretation. Just give us a sense about how you think about the law. Go ahead.
03:43Well, thank you, Senator, and again, it's really hard to believe that we're both sitting across from each other. I
03:49met you, it's been a long time since I met you at Holt Summit at your opening ceremony when you
03:53had just been sworn in as the Attorney General of Missouri, and I was a law clerk on the Missouri
03:57Supreme Court at the time, and it was just truly an honor, and so great to see everything you've done
04:02since 2016.
04:03I worked for some great judges, Zell Fisher and Bobby Shepard, who taught me how to look at statutes, look
04:09at the original meaning of a constitutional provision, look at its text, and having respect for the legislative bodies and
04:15the people that ratify the various provisions, both in the Constitution and statutes.
04:20And again, that's what I've learned, and so far, the best instrument, the best measure of constitutional interpretation and textual
04:29interpretation that I've come across is originalism, is textualism, it's a powerful interpretive method to, again, restrain otherwise unrestrained federal
04:42judges and other, even at the state level.
04:45And it's not a doctrine that's been developed, you know, tremendously at the state level, but I was very proud
04:50when I was clerking that we had a huge emphasis for going back to the text, going to the original
04:55meaning, going to the structure of the Constitution, going to what the people at the time thought they were passing,
05:01and they were in fact passing.
05:03So, I have great respect for the legislative process, I have great respect for the courts, and again, someone like
05:08me who, you know, was born in a country that didn't have the kind of robust protections, due process and
05:13otherwise, that we do have in this country.
05:15I'm just such a proud American, I've been able to witness that firsthand, and I'm so proud to be here
05:19as a district court nominee, and to have the opportunity to even apply those principles to begin with is quite
05:24an honor.
05:27Subscribe to One India and never miss an update.
05:32Download the One India app now.

Recommended