Skip to playerSkip to main content
A reporter pressed US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to reveal details of his conversation with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. The exchange raised questions about Washington’s diplomatic engagement with Moscow amid ongoing tensions over the Ukraine war.

#MarcoRubio #SergeyLavrov #USRussiaRelations #Russia #UkraineWar #DonaldTrump #USPolitics #BreakingNews #WorldNews #Diplomacy

Also Read

What Did Marco Rubio Say On Anti-EC Protests In India? US Secretary Of State Compares Riots And Protests :: https://www.oneindia.com/international/what-did-marco-rubio-say-on-anti-ec-protests-in-india-us-secretary-of-state-compares-riots-and-prot-8241325.html?ref=DMDesc

Marco Rubio Was Critical Of Pakistan. What Changed After He Became US Secretary Of State? :: https://www.oneindia.com/india/marco-rubio-was-critical-of-pakistan-what-changed-after-he-became-us-secretary-of-state-8241109.html?ref=DMDesc

No Change in US Policy On Ukraine: Marco Rubio In Mumbai :: https://www.oneindia.com/india/no-change-in-us-policy-on-ukraine-marco-rubio-in-mumbai-8240775.html?ref=DMDesc



~HT.318~ED.103~GR.506~VG.HM~

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Thank you so much, Mr. Secretary, Alex Raffold.
00:01This better be a good question, because I wasn't going to call him.
00:03Go ahead.
00:03Just to follow up on what you just said on Lavrov,
00:06can you give us a better sense of your interaction with Lavrov this time?
00:09My what?
00:10Your interaction with Lavrov.
00:12Well, we didn't have a meeting.
00:13We spoke.
00:13I mean, we spoke about, you know, but we didn't have a meeting.
00:17You know, we spoke just briefly about the opportunity for our leaders
00:21to potentially interact at APEC next month.
00:24And we spoke about, you know, there's no firm commitments about G20.
00:30And that was – but we didn't have any – we didn't have a meeting.
00:33He did speak to his own tool, and he mentioned that the position on Ukraine has not changed.
00:39Even that position makes you believe that negotiated peace is achievable?
00:43Thank you so much.
00:44Well, I don't know if negotiated peace is achievable in Ukraine.
00:47That's what we're trying to find out.
00:49But I don't think anyone here is claiming that we're on the verge of a negotiated settlement.
00:52I think what I can say to you is that the United States – you know, we have people that
00:56basically,
00:56you know, Jared and Steve as an example, work on this portfolio almost full-time between that and Iran.
01:01That's all they focus on.
01:02They don't focus on the quad.
01:04They don't focus on Western Hemisphere.
01:06They don't focus – they focus on that.
01:08And we've invested – to say we've invested a lot of high-level attention to that topic.
01:13But, you know, we're going to continue to try and see if we can reach an agreement.
01:17But I'm not here to tell you we're on the verge of one, but hopefully we are.
01:19But today, you know, we didn't have any meetings about that at this G20 gathering.
01:24Okay, in this row right here.
01:30Thank you, Mr. Secretary.
01:32I wanted to ask you if the United States helped Flavio Bolsonaro flee Brazil,
01:36and if you had any engagement with the foreign minister of Brazil here in Atlanta.
01:43Yeah, yeah, I saw him here today.
01:44We talked yesterday as well.
01:45I think we'll see each other in France.
01:47I think he's attending.
01:48Brazil's an observer at the G7.
01:49They were there, so we'll see them in France in a few weeks.
01:53We didn't facilitate anything.
01:55I mean, we had word that he was arrived in the United States.
01:58He had previously held a visa, and the president made a decision to allow him to enter the country,
02:02which we did.
02:03But we were not involved in any of the arrangements he made in terms of leaving.
02:06At least the U.S. government was not involved directly in any of the moves that were made.
02:11But the president made clear that if he arrived in the United States in a port of entry,
02:14that he would be paroled into the country, and he was.
02:17Okay?
02:18Back row right there.
02:19Yes, ma'am.
02:20You?
02:20Yeah.
02:21You sound surprised.
02:22It's a press conference.
02:23You ready?
02:23Okay, let's go.
02:24Thank you very much, Mr. Secretary.
02:26Do you think a limited ceasefire regarding Black Sea shipping and grains is more likely now than before following this
02:34conference?
02:34Yeah, I'm not an odds maker.
02:35I wouldn't say more or less likely.
02:37I would say there's interest in facilitating it.
02:39And by the way, it's not new.
02:40Turkey, like Turkey, for example, has been consistently and at one point did have an agreement in place in the
02:45past that then, of course, fell apart.
02:47So I wouldn't say it's – I don't want to put or prognosticate the chances of it.
02:51I do think it's having an impact on many countries around the world.
02:54You heard that expressed today.
02:55The African continent in particular is paying a high price for it, and there's an energy component to it as
02:59well.
03:00So I really hate to put, like, odds because in foreign policy in particular, odds are a hard thing to
03:05set.
03:06But I do think there's an incredible amount of interest in facilitating something that we have nation states that are
03:12involved.
03:12And India has also expressed an interest in perhaps floating some ideas.
03:16And so we're open to that.
03:18We've been talking to countries.
03:19But I can't give you odds as to how likely it is to happen.
03:21We'd like to see it happen.
03:22It doesn't solve the war problem, but at least it diminishes some of the impact, spillover impact, that it's having
03:27on the food security of vulnerable countries.
03:30Okay.
03:31Yes.
03:31Did I already get you?
03:32No.
03:33Okay.
03:33Can we start putting, like, a little sticker on people when I call them?
03:36Because I can't – like, I'm – the lights make it hard for me to see you.
03:39Marco Valerio from Rai, Italian National TV.
03:42Ah, Italy.
03:43Oh, yeah.
03:43My question is, in your speech in Athens, you call for a revival of Western democratic values.
03:50Yes.
03:50And I was wondering, when it comes to food crisis or Ukrainian crisis, is there any of those values that
03:56the U.S., along with the Europeans, is trying to uphold in finding a solution on the Ukrainian conflict?
04:02Well, I think primarily – look, obviously, but, I mean, at the end of the day, I think the Ukrainian
04:05-Russian issue is pretty singular right now, which is we're trying to stop a very deadly war.
04:11In which, on the one hand, Kyiv every single night is facing devastating attacks against its energy infrastructure, but also
04:18increasing number of civilians being killed.
04:20And even on the Russian side, you know, you're seeing 20,000 Russians killed a month.
04:25It's a very deadly and destructive war.
04:27And every month that goes by, you're just adding – I mean, think about how long it's going to take.
04:31When this stops, how long is it going to take Ukraine to rebuild its economy, rebuild its energy grid?
04:36We also think it's very costly for Russia as well.
04:38So right now, I mean, yes, I mean, ultimately, we would, you know, I think embedded in all of this
04:42is values that we care a lot about.
04:44But the primary value we care about is it's not really very complicated.
04:47There's a very nasty war going on, very destructive war, what appears to be in some ways of a stalemate
04:53that has the threat of escalation and spreading into other places.
04:56We already see some ancillary effects of this crisis.
04:59As an example, the Black Sea.
05:01As an example, some of these, you know, irregular efforts at sabotage that have spread into other countries.
05:09Drones that are being launched, that are being intercepted by electronic means, and so they wander into the airspace of
05:14a NATO country.
05:15There's a lot of danger involved in that as well.
05:19So from us, the singular focus is how can we – is there an opportunity for the United States, because
05:24we talk to both sides, to be able to facilitate a negotiated end to a very deadly, very costly, and
05:31very destructive war?
05:32And that's really what we're focused on.
05:35I think what's – and that's a pretty ambitious desire.
05:38Everyone has encouraged us, and every meeting we have, no matter what, be it the Europeans or others, we are
05:42encouraged to remain involved and engaged in this.
05:44And so we've remained involved and engaged, but that's really what we're focused on there.
05:48I don't know how that ties into the speech I gave.
05:52Yes.
05:53Behind – well, go ahead.
05:54I feel bad I pointed at you.
05:55Go ahead.
05:58We need to have more than one mic, guys.
06:00This is – go ahead.
06:01Thank you, Mr. Secretary.
06:02Yes.
06:03Paris Hwang, Voice America.
06:04Did you get a chance to convey the U.S.'s commitment to Taiwan and Ukraine to your Chinese and Russian
06:10counterparts?
06:11Also, did you also get a chance to talk to them, the potential bilateral meeting in AIPAC or even in
06:17Miami?
06:18Which bilateral?
06:19I'm sorry.
06:20Between President Trump, President Xi, and President Putin.
06:24Well, there will most certainly be a bilateral meeting at both.
06:26I mean, they'll meet in addition to being a part of these forums.
06:29I'm certain that we'll meet with regards to that.
06:31So we really – we didn't discuss it.
06:33Those brief conversations about arrangements for both the attendance at G20 and at AIPAC.
06:37So we talked about that.
06:39But that was the gist of it.
06:40I mean, ultimately, the point of this gathering, as I said, is we want – it's not that geopolitical issues
06:44wouldn't be discussed at G20, because I'm sure they are.
06:46And there were a lot of other bilateral meetings going on that we were not involved in between the different
06:50countries we were here.
06:51And it's why we structured the agenda the way we did, to leave plenty of time for some of these
06:55countries to interact with one another.
06:57So I can't speak to all of those meetings.
06:59But the core of this meeting and the core of what the President's vision has been for G20 is to
07:04bring the G20, which is primarily an economic forum, back to its core principle and purpose.
07:10And that's what we tried to address in the agenda we outlined today.
07:13That doesn't mean that geopolitical issues weren't discussed on the sidelines by different countries, but that's what we focused on
07:19in both our agenda and in our engagements.

Recommended