00:00 The second part of the program is the main case in which the election of Pakistan's justice system is at stake.
00:07 The decision is expected to be made soon.
00:09 Will Pakistan's justice system get an election?
00:12 Or will there be a possibility of an alternate election?
00:16 Let's see what the Supreme Court's observation and decision on this is.
00:21 Let's take a look at today's hearing.
00:24 Let's see what the important questions raised in this case were.
00:31 PML has written that Nia Nawaz Sharif, President unopposed, Miriam Nawaz Sharif, Sajid Abbas, President unopposed, S.A.N. Iqbal, S.J.J. unopposed, etc.
00:42 If they are tied, there are only six people, nothing else. All unopposed.
00:47 And on the next page, what is the point?
00:51 The point is that unopposed political parties can have an unopposed opinion.
00:56 Sir, they are saying that people have gone into his house and beaten up his family.
01:05 They took away his computer, his documents, and left.
01:09 I just got the news that they have beaten up my nephew.
01:13 I will continue.
01:19 We are living in difficult times, but let's go on.
01:27 Meanwhile, we saw that the Election Commission of Pakistan's decision was made regarding ANP.
01:34 Their election sign was also very uncertain about the inter-party elections.
01:41 But today, the ANP was given the sign of a red flag by the Election Commission.
01:45 And in that decision, it was said that the Election Commission has been given the order to hold a party election in four months along with the penalty.
01:53 The Election Commission gave the ANP the sign of a red flag for the elections.
01:57 The schedule for the general elections has been given.
02:00 The National Party has held the party elections till May 10.
02:03 Whereas on the other hand, the Election Commission did not allot the election sign to PTI on the matter of inter-party elections.
02:09 So, are both cases different?
02:11 In this case, the decision will be made in some time.
02:16 But on the basis of the arguments that have been made today, where can this matter go?
02:21 We will talk about this in the program.
02:23 Mr. Kamran Murtaza, let's start with you.
02:25 There is a party that has to participate in the upcoming elections.
02:27 There is a large number of voters associated with it.
02:30 They do not have clarity about the election sign yet.
02:34 Maybe they will get it after some time.
02:36 In this context, what are you seeing?
02:39 The arguments that have been made, there are two different factors.
02:42 One is whether the inter-party elections were clear or not.
02:44 And the second aspect is whether a large number of people will get the right to vote for their party in the elections or not.
02:51 Earlier, you were telling me about Mr. Gorkhan.
02:59 I had called him and he picked up the phone.
03:02 I messaged him and he sympathized with me.
03:06 He is a friend and a lawyer.
03:08 The question you asked depends on the case to case.
03:17 I don't know what the case of the party that has been elected for four months is.
03:23 Because it is obvious that you are not following every case.
03:27 Or you are not interested in that case.
03:30 I am interested in this case because when Peshawar High Court went to the court,
03:35 as a lawyer, I was concerned about the case pertaining to Islamabad.
03:40 How did Peshawar High Court go to the court?
03:43 Or did Peshawar High Court give the order of the Wax Party?
03:46 Or did it give the order that could have been given in the case of a final judgment?
03:51 I was concerned about that.
03:53 Otherwise, as a party, I was not concerned about that.
03:59 I was concerned about the case pertaining to justice.
04:05 Now, this decision is safe.
04:08 I think this decision will be announced in some time.
04:13 If this was the case of the ANP, then it would have been argued.
04:19 I think this ANP case has not been argued.
04:23 Or suppose that after that, this case has been brought forward.
04:26 Then, there is no request for additional argument.
04:29 Or no additional document has been filed.
04:31 So, let's hope that whatever decision will be made, it will be according to the law and the constitution.
04:38 And it should be so.
04:40 Neither any party should be in favour nor against anyone.
04:43 Whatever happens, it should be according to the law and the constitution.
04:45 Mr. Kamran, this is your legal opinion.
04:47 Now, I will ask you a question from a political aspect.
04:49 The election is so near.
04:51 There is a political party.
04:52 The voters of that party will not know whether they can cast their vote.
04:57 In case, if they do not get the ballot.
04:59 And they will not be able to participate fully in the political process.
05:04 So, in the context of fairness of the election, what kind of system will it be?
05:09 What kind of election will it be?
05:10 And what is its credibility?
05:12 And what is its conclusion?
05:13 This is a turning point in this election.
05:15 Whatever decision will be made today.
05:17 No, this is right.
05:19 The most important thing is that as the Chief Justice asked a question.
05:23 The election commission of Pakistan.
05:25 Yes, sir, I have a question for you.
05:27 In 2022, I will ask you.
05:31 He said that you did not get the election.
05:33 You were repeatedly asking the election commission to get the elections.
05:38 So, you got the elections for a year.
05:40 Then you got the election ended for a year in the name of Corona.
05:43 Then despite this, you got the elections.
05:46 At that time, you were in the government. You were the Prime Minister of Pakistan.
05:49 Why didn't you get the elections at that time?
05:51 This is also a question mark.
05:53 But one very important thing is that our election act.
05:57 In which, Saeed Ali Zafar repeatedly told the Honorable Chief Justice.
06:02 That, sir, all sections of section 208 are written in section 5.
06:07 That if any party or any party fails to pass the election.
06:10 Then the election commission can be fined two lakh rupees.
06:13 This was the timing.
06:15 Before the writing of our Constitution.
06:18 It was not before.
06:19 This formal amendment came a week or two before the writing.
06:22 He repeatedly stated that.
06:24 At that time, the Chief Justice said that if you want the election commission to fine you.
06:29 And accept you as an intra-party election.
06:31 In section 208, all sections 5 say that you can be fined two lakh rupees.
06:37 Earlier it was ten thousand, twenty thousand rupees.
06:39 But after the amendment, it was done in two lakh rupees.
06:44 So, it is possible that the Honorable Chief Justice.
06:47 Keeping this decision in mind.
06:49 Can make some decision.
06:51 Section 208, section 5 is very important.
06:56 And repeatedly, Saeed Ali Zafar has emphasized it.
06:59 This is also a very important question.
07:01 Like you said, the ANT was fined thirty thousand rupees.
07:05 And got a single lantern.
07:07 It is possible that after considering everything.
07:10 The Honorable Chief Justice will consider it.
07:13 So, all these matters.
07:15 On day three, in giving arguments.
07:17 Ahmed Khan and Ali Zafar have given very good arguments.
07:20 Now, looking at all the points of it.
07:23 The Chief Justice will decide.
