Skip to playerSkip to main content
Senior counsel GK Ganesan asks court to direct Shahrol Azral Ibrahim Halmi to answer questions put to him.

Read More:
https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2026/08/26/15-no-comment-replies-from-ex-1mdb-ceo-irks-defence-lawyer

Laporan Lanjut:
https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/bahasa/tempatan/2026/08/26/peguam-tak-puas-hati-bekas-ceo-1mdb-15-kali-jawab-tiada-komen

Free Malaysia Today is an independent, bi-lingual news portal with a focus on Malaysian current affairs.

Subscribe to our channel - http://bit.ly/2Qo08ry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check us out at https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com
Follow FMT on Facebook: https://bit.ly/49JJoo5
Follow FMT on Dailymotion: https://bit.ly/2WGITHM
Follow FMT on X: https://bit.ly/48zARSW
Follow FMT on Instagram: https://bit.ly/48Cq76h
Follow FMT on TikTok : https://bit.ly/3uKuQFp
Follow FMT Berita on TikTok: https://bit.ly/48vpnQG
Follow FMT Telegram - https://bit.ly/42VyzMX
Follow FMT LinkedIn - https://bit.ly/42YytEb
Follow FMT Lifestyle on Instagram: https://bit.ly/42WrsUj
Follow FMT on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/49GMbxW
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download FMT News App:
Google Play – http://bit.ly/2YSuV46
App Store – https://apple.co/2HNH7gZ
Huawei AppGallery - https://bit.ly/2D2OpNP

#FMTNews

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Former 1MDB CEO Shahrol Azrael Ibrahim Halmi was repeatedly challenged in court today after
00:06responding no comment during cross-examination in 1MDB's US$5.64 billion civil suit.
00:13Senior Counsel GK Ganesan, representing former 1MDB Investment Director Kelvin Tan, the seventh
00:19defendant, asked Judicial Commissioner Radzwan Idris to direct Shahrol to answer questions from
00:24the defense. Ganesan argued that Shahrol, 56, could not repeatedly refuse to answer
00:29while giving evidence as the fourth plaintiff witness in the case. The issue had earlier
00:34surfaced during questioning by lawyer Shafi Abdullah, who represents former Prime Minister Najib Razak,
00:39over a RM5 billion bond issued by Terengganu Investment Authority, Berhad. Shahrol had alleged
00:45the bond was issued on Najib's instructions but responded no comment when questioned further.
00:51Ganesan argued that under the Evidence Act 1950, a witness must answer questions even if the response
00:57could expose them to civil or criminal liability. He also cited provisions allowing questions to test
01:03credibility and courts to draw inferences from unanswered questions. The application was supported
01:10by Shahfi. Radzwan said the court could make the necessary inference if a witness refused to answer
01:16after being directed to do so. Radzwan also questioned why the issue was not raised earlier by lawyers who had
01:22cross-examined Shahrol, adding that the plaintiff's counsel should have assisted or guided its witness
01:28to answer. The civil suit was filed by 1MDB and its subsidiaries in 2021, seeking to recover 5.64 billion
01:36US dollars over alleged breach of trust, breach of statutory duty, abuse of power and conspiracy to
01:43misappropriate funds. The defendants originally included Najib, former 1MDB officials and other individuals,
01:50reports, although 1MDB has since dropped its suit against former Chief Financial Officer Radhi Mohamad
01:55and removed former General Counsel Jasmine Liu from the case.
02:00Jessalyn Kaur, FMT
Comments

Recommended