Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 1 week ago
McClure says she was walking her dog when Betty’s loose cat suddenly appeared and scratched the dog’s ear. Betty insists she shouldn’t be responsible because California has no leash law for cats but Judge Judy quickly finds a problem with that logic.

Judge Judy explains that the absence of a specific cat leash law doesn’t automatically shield an owner from responsibility when a roaming pet causes unprovoked injury or damage.

Judge Judy became a daytime television institution during its 25-season run with Judith Sheindlin’s blunt questioning and memorable courtroom confrontations.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:00what makes you think you're not responsible for the vet bill because i don't believe i am i mean
00:04my cat wasn't on a leash there is no leash law in california well you choose to let your cat
00:08outside
00:09and cat doesn't have to be on a leash that doesn't mean you're not responsible but that just means if
00:15you choose to let your cat outside and if you choose to let it walk without a leash if it
00:20goes
00:20over to a baby in a carriage correct jumps up on a carriage correct and scratches the baby's eyes
00:26out you're going to be responsible you're going to be responsible even though there's no cat leash law
00:33you're responsible your responsibility i respectfully don't agree well i don't care what you agree with
00:40i mean did you go to an accredited law school no i did you go to any law school no
00:44i'm telling you
00:45what the law is
Comments

Recommended