- 2 weeks ago
This video was made by Zoomer Historian and uploaded to YouTube in 2025 shortly before his channel got banned
Category
📚
LearningTranscript
00:00On British Twitter, many will be familiar with what we would term
00:03slop accounts, who post generic watered-down, pro-British, pro-Israel, anti-Islamic and
00:09civic nationalist type posts, often utilising AI. The owners of such accounts are often not even
00:15British, very often tend to be Indian. Recently, one of the more egregious examples of these
00:20accounts, going by the name of God Save Great Britain, posted a picture of the late Queen
00:24Elizabeth II with the following caption, quote, This extraordinary woman carried out her duty
00:30until her very last breath, because she knew Charles couldn't. She was right, end quote.
00:35There was plenty of pushback against this post from people like myself, but at the time of
00:39writing, the post has 58,000 likes and over 7,000 retweets, and at first glance, most Brits
00:46would instinctively agree with the tweet. The image surrounding the late Queen was seemingly
00:51immaculate. To most people alive today, she was always a little delicate old lady, and
00:55a quiet one at that. She had mastered the art of decorum. She acted exactly like a monarch,
01:01or, at least, a monarch in the modern British sense, that is, a figurehead. She was a blast
01:06from the past, a relic from a bygone age, and, as time went on, she essentially became all
01:12we had left from our great past. When she died, it hit almost everyone to the core, regardless
01:17of their political views, and even I was left momentarily saddened. It truly felt as if our
01:23great past had finally been buried. There is a reason our people queued up in their thousands
01:27to go and say their final goodbyes. In life, and in death, she was adored almost unanimously
01:33throughout the nation. Now that the dust has settled, though, it's worth taking a second
01:37look. Sure, on the surface, she seemed like the perfect respectable queen that she was presented
01:42as. But was that really the case if you peer under the surface? Did the mask ever slip?
01:47What was her agenda? The mask most certainly did slip, and in many cases, in quite an egregious
01:52fashion. Queen Elizabeth was not one of our greatest monarchs, as she is presented. She
01:57is, in fact, perhaps the very worst. She presided over the destruction of everything which had
02:02taken us centuries to build. She cheered on and actively supported the genocide of her
02:07own people, the British people, abroad. At home, she was equally as terrible to her people,
02:12and cheered on their ethnic replacement. The church that she was the head of was also
02:17completely decimated, and has now become a complete irrelevance. Nowadays, she is often
02:22compared to her son, Charles, who, as king, has been immeasurably worse, at least when it comes to
02:28prudence. He isn't trying to hide it, he just comes right out and sucks up to the invaders, and
02:33effectively sticks the middle finger up at the British people. His mother had far more
02:37tact than that, and quite naturally, he is seen as far worse.
02:41But how great can a queen really be who oversaw the collapse of our world-spanning empire?
02:46How great can a queen be who inherited an almost entirely homogenous Great Britain, a Britain
02:52peopled by her people, the British, and then left behind a Britain in which only around 70%
02:57of the population were British? These are the people she was meant to protect. Any other
03:02monarch in history has been, or would have been, condemned for all time had the same or similar
03:07things happened during their reign. King John saw us lose our French territories,
03:11and is remembered as our worst ever king. Queen Elizabeth lost so much more, and sat back
03:17as large swathes of our own country were colonised by third world foreigners. Her British subjects
03:22in those regions were then subjected to untold horrors such as the rape gangs, in which hundreds
03:27of thousands of our little girls were tortured or even murdered by mostly Pakistani men. Not
03:32once did she lift a finger. Does this all not make her immeasurably worse than King John?
03:37Let's take a real look at Queen Elizabeth. This is by no means a deep dive on her entire
03:41life, or all of her evil deeds, but this, I hope, at least says as a partial eye-opener,
03:46so that people will think again about her majesty. A couple things before we begin. Firstly, this
03:52video is in no way, shape, or form political, and is purely a work of history. Please, do not
03:57overthink it, and turn it into something it is not. Thank you. Secondly, a huge thank you to
04:02those of you who have signed up as a member here on YouTube, on Subscribestar, or, best
04:06of all, over on Ko-fi. Without your kind subscriptions, or one-time Ko-fi donations, these videos would
04:13quite simply not be possible, and I wouldn't be able to do this for a living. I really cannot
04:17thank you enough. Even the lowest tier helps immeasurably. Thank you.
04:21When Queen Elizabeth came to the throne in 1952, she inherited a very different Britain to the
04:26one her father had in 1936. Britain had been bankrupted by World War II, and the will to
04:31empire was almost completely gone. Worst of all, American pressure to decolonize was ever increasing.
04:38India had already gone. We had pulled out of Palestine, and the rest of our empire was looking
04:42to follow in those footsteps. It all just seemed inevitable. Trying to cling onto this empire at
04:48this stage, for most governments, would have been futile. It was a tough pill to swallow, but that was
04:53simply the reality of the situation. Queen Elizabeth's response was to throw her weight behind the
04:57Commonwealth project instead of just pulling out. The Commonwealth, essentially, is meant to be an
05:02association of independent states consisting of countries which is formed out of the British
05:07Empire. Initially, before the war, the Commonwealth was by any definition simply the white settler
05:12colonies of the British Empire, which had found their own feet to such a degree that they were now
05:17basically independent, but would still be part of the British Empire in name. They were bound by
05:21ethnicity, and this definition made perfect sense. Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa
05:27had all been settled by the English, the Scottish, the Welsh, and the Irish. In the Balfour Declaration
05:32of 1926, at that year's Imperial Conference, the United Kingdom and her dominions agreed that they were
05:38quote, autonomous communities within the British Empire, equal in status, in no way subordinate one to
05:45another in any respect of their domestic or external affairs. Though united by a common allegiance to the
05:50crown and freely associated as members of the British Commonwealth of Nations, end quote.
05:55Allegiance to the crown was merely a polite way of putting it. The Commonwealth was explicitly racial.
06:01India had not been granted her independence, quite simply because they were not white. The British
06:07Empire was the global expansion of the British people. Anyone living within it before the year 1945
06:12would have understood this. Queen Elizabeth, however, was embarking on quite a different venture
06:17and was throwing herself into uncharted waters. Instead of just dissolving the Empire and letting
06:22these countries all get on with their own affairs, she insisted on just making every single
06:26character of the British Empire part of the Commonwealth. This was not entirely her own doing,
06:31but she followed in the footsteps of her father to the extreme. In the 1949 London Declaration, the term
06:37British was removed from the term British Commonwealth of Nations. A sign of changing times, indeed. In her 1953
06:44Christmas broadcast, Her Majesty described her new, multi-racial Commonwealth. Quote,
06:50The Commonwealth bears no resemblance to the empires of the past. It is an entirely new conception,
06:56built on the highest qualities of the spirit of man, friendship, loyalty, and the desire for freedom
07:01and peace, end quote. This was quite a change from the British-only club of 1926, in which every country
07:07had zero conflicting interests, as they were, after all, the same people, just on different land masses.
07:13In WWII, all of the dominions would rush to our aid and fight side by side with us. And why
07:19would they not?
07:20It was the most natural thing in the world. It is the same as defending your very own family members
07:25if they came into conflict with someone. Who would stand by and do nothing in such a situation,
07:29regardless of the rights or wrongs? By contrast, the Commonwealth had never lifted a finger to help us.
07:35Quite the opposite. They have been the albatross around our necks ever since. In 1961, in Ghana,
07:41the Queen doubled down. Quote,
07:43The Commonwealth is not a thing of the past. It is not tied to the British Empire. It is a
07:48completely
07:48new conception, built on voluntary association, end quote. Quite simply, the Commonwealth now existed
07:54purely for royal ego. On paper, the British royal family were now the monarchs of the Commonwealth
07:59nations. In reality, this meant nothing at all. Britain had lost all benefits of empire, but the
08:05Crown wanted to keep the title. In reality, these ties would create nothing but trouble, and even
08:10genocide against British populations. Every single African nation which was given independence
08:16immediately collapsed into anarchy and dictatorship. Massive ethnic violence was commonplace. When they
08:22weren't massacring each other, however, they would turn on the white man. The aggressor would then
08:27suddenly become the downtrodden innocent victim. All of these third world states would band together
08:32each year at the Commonwealth Prime Minister's Conference, and push the most anti-white line
08:36possible. If their demands were not met, then they would simply threaten to pull out of the
08:40Commonwealth, and even in some cases, boycott Britain. There's so much for these wholesome
08:45Commonwealth of nations united in shared values, and built upon the highest qualities of the
08:50spirit of man, as she put it. This was the absolute scum of the earth, literal dictators who had
08:55slaughtered millions, banding together to tear down the white man. These demands the Queen and the
09:01British government conceded to willingly. Rhodesia is by far the best example. Joshua Nkomo, a literal
09:07terrorist dissident before Rhodesian independence, was welcomed to Britain with open arms as a Commonwealth
09:12migrant, and showered in taxpayer money, so that he could plan his terrorist acts from the UK.
09:17His children were educated in England at taxpayer expense, as he lived it up with a car and other
09:22luxuries, and was able to mix with Labour MPs and other high-level members of the British establishment.
09:27When Nkomo finally returned to Rhodesia, he was 50 pounds heavier, fattened up by the British taxpayer.
09:33Rhodesia was, of course, demanding to remain the way it was. There was no colour bar, but suffrage was
09:38decided by easily attainable monetary and literacy requirements. The latter was as simple as literally
09:44just signing your own name. In reality, this resulted in the white minority ruling the country,
09:49but evidently, this was working, as Rhodesia was extremely prosperous, and had perhaps the lowest
09:54crime rate on the entire planet. Britain, at the behest of the Commonwealth, demanded nothing less
10:00than national suicide. Every man should be given the right to vote, they said. Just a few decades
10:05beforehand, Britain would have considered these new voters to be violent savages who would take
10:10centuries to turn into functional civilised human beings. Yet here they were, demanding they be
10:15put into power at the behest of the screeching Commonwealth horde. Prime Minister of Rhodesia,
10:19Ian Smith, wrote of his meeting with Duncan Sandys, Secretary of State for the Colonies and son-in-law
10:24of Winston Churchill, quote,
10:26We talked at length, and although his demeanour was more congenial than on the previous occasion,
10:31the final result gave me no cause for joy. He repeated and elaborated on the message which
10:36I had been given by Alec Holm, stressed the danger of disrupting the Commonwealth,
10:41and told me that there would even be opposition from some left-wing Conservative MP to the agreement
10:45for which we were asking, end quote. Even Conservative MPs could not be moved.
10:50Anything which benefited white people would disrupt the Commonwealth. The head of the Commonwealth was,
10:55of course, to the late Queen. In February 1964, Sir Humphrey Gibbs, the Governor of Rhodesia,
11:01gave a speech at the opening of Parliament. The Governor is, of course, the Queen's representative
11:06in a given territory. Quote,
11:08It is now plain that the British government are not prepared to be brought to any conclusion on
11:13the question of independence, except on the most extravagant terms, not because of misgivings about
11:18my government's competence and ability to govern in the interest of the country, or the logic or
11:22rightness of my ministers' case, but because they wish to placate at all costs members of the
11:27Commonwealth who have declared openly their hostility to my government and my country, end quote.
11:32Her Majesty responded to these complaints by banning Rhodesian Prime Ministers from the Commonwealth
11:37Prime Minister's conferences. Her own flesh and blood was being thrown out in the cold to placate the
11:42seething masses of Africa. Smith expressed his resentment publicly, quote,
11:46We are not excluded because we are no longer loyal to the crown, or to the ideals on which
11:51the Commonwealth was founded. We are excluded because the Commonwealth has outgrown itself,
11:56and there is no longer room for us among the motley of small countries which have recently been
12:00granted independence and admitted to the Commonwealth without regard to their adherence to the ideals
12:05and concept on which it was founded. I wonder if we are really wanted in the Commonwealth any longer,
12:10and if we can serve any purpose by remaining, end quote. Before independence, Smith met with Salazar,
12:16the ruler of Portugal. He writes of their meeting, quote, He expressed his special concern for southern
12:21Rhodesia, assuring me that Portugal would continue with its proven policy of evolution in Mozambique
12:26and Angola, bringing local people into positions of authority, as and when they proved themselves.
12:32But it was clear that Britain was coming more and more under the influence of the black members of the
12:36Commonwealth, and it was obvious to any logical observer that these countries were being manipulated
12:41as tools by the Russians. He was particularly distressed that the British were going along with
12:45this, not because they were unaware of what was taking place, but because of Britain's policy of
12:50appeasing the organization of African unity. His sources confirmed this, and he was pleased at the
12:55opportunity to pass it on to me, end quote. Rhodesia was left with no choice but to declare independence.
13:00To remain would have meant genocide at the hands of a black government, as later happened anyway.
13:04The Queen personally intervened during negotiations, and completely threw her weight behind Harold
13:10Wilson, the Labour Prime Minister intent on making Rhodesia commit suicide. The British had even
13:15cheekily inserted a clause during negotiations which stated that all Rhodesian laws must be approved
13:21by the Queen. This was a Trojan horse. As Peter Joyce writes in Anatomy of a Rebel, quote,
13:27For Queen, of course, read British government, end quote. The Rhodesians at one point, utterly desperate,
13:33sent a letter to the Queen, begging their sovereign to help them out of their current situation,
13:37and to see sense. Her response was essentially a veiled threat the manner that they act constitutionally,
13:42that is, commit suicide. It was pointless of them to even try. The blacks of Rhodesia had already begun
13:48their attempt at white genocide, and the Queen had staunchly sided with them. Right from the very first
13:53attack, in fact, the Queen had chosen her side. In 1964, Piet Oberholzer was driving with his family
13:59in Rhodesia's south east, when suddenly he came to a makeshift checkpoint. Piet told his wife to stay
14:05in the car and hide their young daughter under the seat. He then cautiously approached the checkpoint,
14:10and began to try to talk to the Africans blocking the road. As he did so, more Africans approached his
14:15car and began pouring gasoline all over his family. Piet immediately rushed to defend his family,
14:21when suddenly a knife plunged into his chest. Heroically, however, he was able to fend off
14:26the savages, and rushed inside of the vehicle. With his dying breaths, he drove away, and got his
14:31children to safety before the bumbling attackers could set the gasoline alight. He then fell dead,
14:36and thankfully, his wife and child were rescued. At the scene of the crime, the attackers left a bunch
14:41of messages written on lined paper, torn from a school exercise book. They were all threats of white
14:46genocide. One read, quote, Crocodile gang will soon kill all whites, beware, end quote.
14:52These scumbags were promptly caught by the Rhodesian security forces, and quite rightly, sentenced to
14:57death. This was where Her Majesty chose to directly intervene, and demanded that the murderers be
15:02spared. The Rhodesians had, by now, had quite enough of her antics, and had already declared independence.
15:07There was no question of listening to her. Her loyalty was by now very clear, and the criminals were put
15:13to
15:13death. Elizabeth, of course, had no qualms about helping terrorists. She would later meet with
15:17genocidal maniacs, such as Robert Mugabe and Nelson Mandela, with no qualms at all.
15:23Smith wrote of the moment when he sat down, right before making his final decision to break with
15:27Britain. Quote, I slumped back in my chair for a few minutes to contemplate the situation.
15:32I was overwhelmed by a feeling of absolute frustration. There was, within my whole system,
15:37a very strong desire to preserve my links with the history and tradition and culture that I had been
15:42brought up to respect and believe in. But over the last half decade, this had taken a tremendous
15:47battering. When one looked at the composition of the current Commonwealth, the whole character of
15:51it had changed. Within Britain itself, we were landed with a socialist government, hell-bent on appeasing
15:57the cult of Marxism-Leninism, at the expense of the old traditional values of the British Empire.
16:03This was never part of my tradition and culture. But most important, and above all else, was the
16:08treatment to which we had been subjected. The breaches of agreements, the double standards,
16:13the blatant deception and blackmail with which we were confronted. To put it crudely, we had had
16:18an absolute belly full. Rhodesians simply wished to be left to lead their own lives. End quote.
16:23To the Rhodesians, it was almost incomprehensible, and it was all about to get much worse.
16:27Throughout the entire conflict, Her Majesty harboured terrorists, and allowed Britain to actively
16:32supply the terrorists on the ground. At the Commonwealth Conference of 1965, the Africans demanded the
16:37Great Britain smother Rhodesia in sanctions, and Rhodesia, the nation with the world's lowest crime
16:42rate, was declared a threat to world peace. The Third World dictators also demanded that Britain
16:47actively invade Rhodesia, but this of course was where Britain had to draw the line. After checking
16:51with the armed forces and reading the public mood, it rapidly became very clear that the British people
16:56would never tolerate directly attacking their own kiff and kin, their own family. Instead, the British
17:02government, supported every step of the way by Her Majesty, had to settle for dumping endless amounts
17:07of taxpayer money into supporting the terrorists, and enforcing a blockade on Rhodesia.
17:11A year after UDI in 1966, the Commonwealth Conference was the same as always. Smith writes
17:17of the Third World leaders, which Her Majesty had enthralled her country to. Quote,
17:21Conda was incensed at the cutting down of British financial aid, and in typical manner,
17:26resulted in hurling abuse and insult at Wilson, in which he was joined by a number of other black
17:31Commonwealth leaders in demanding a military solution, in view of the fact that sanctions had
17:35proved to be a failure. The Prime Minister's conference duly took place, and as usual,
17:40was accompanied by much verbosity and many threats. The final communique of the 14th of September bore the
17:45taint of the new modern Commonwealth. In place of the traditional, reasoned, balanced and mature wisdom
17:51associated with such associations in former days, it was now split into two clear-cut divisions. On one side,
17:57unfortunately consisting of the majority, with the failures, the have-nots, who resulted to the
18:03traditional of blaming everyone else for their deficiencies. On the other side, unfortunately,
18:07the minority, were the responsible representative of those countries, which had proved themselves to be
18:12truly independent, and could stand on their own feet, the success stories. The first category were destructive,
18:18with their false accusations and threats, the other, constructive, with their efforts directed at
18:23cooperation, and assisting on another to improve standards of life. The failures resulted to the
18:28power cry that they were in the current predicament because they were exploited by the colonial powers.
18:33But Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Rhodesia had gone through the same history. As a matter of
18:39interest, so did USA and South Africa, and they are all glorious success stories. Those who have not
18:45made the grade must stop looking for a scapegoat and look to themselves. Their corruption, incompetence,
18:50nepotism, external bank accounts, and high leisure preference. The fault, dear Brutus, lies not in our stars,
18:56but in ourselves." The Queen's behaviour did not improve with time. Smith went on,
19:03It had, however, become increasingly difficult for us to separate monarch and empire from the
19:07deviousness of the politicians. Wilson went so far, later, as to drag the Queen into his machinations
19:13by getting her to include in a speech at the Jamaica Commonwealth Conference, in April 1975,
19:19some provocative remarks about Rhodesia, which were a distortion of the truth. This caused a large
19:24number of our older generation of loyal citizens to become extremely angry, tearing up their pictures
19:30of the royal family and pulling down their Union Jacks. Some remarked that if only her father or
19:35grandfather had been alive, Wilson would have been put in his place." Queen Elizabeth was so petty that
19:41she demanded that the Rhodesian government remove the word royal from the Royal Rhodesia Regiment and the
19:46Royal Rhodesian Air Force. Obviously, by this point, though, the Rhodesians couldn't care less,
19:51and were happy to be rid of any attachment to the royal family. My fellow Rhodesia enthusiast Will
19:55Tanner also quote tweeted the original tweet, and he sums the Queen's approach to her own kiff and
20:00kin up rather well. Quote,
20:02As documented in So Far and No Further, Rhodesia's bid for independence during the retreat from empire,
20:081959 to 1965. Elizabeth the Worst was integral in pushing Rhodesia's destruction. She encouraged it in
20:15every way she could, did her best to snub and isolate Ian Smith, and in 1980, sent then Prince
20:21Charles to lend Mugabe the legitimacy and support of the Crown, as he began his reign of terror.
20:26That aligned with her time as a royal generally, as she never once lifted a finger or spoke a word
20:31to protect the empire and British people, instead being more than willing to work with the Labour
20:36governments to put a cheery face on the destruction of the country. Yes, the royals have limited power,
20:41so there's little she could have directly done. But they had immense prestige before she and Charles
20:45squandered it, and that could have been used to defend British civilisation from post-war tyranny
20:50and insanity, and she could have used her remaining political power to aid in that project. Instead,
20:55she ignored her duty entirely, and let the country go from ruling a quarter of the globe to barely being
21:00a backwater full of Muslims." In 1980, when Mugabe won the Rhodesian election by brutalising his own
21:07people openly to vote for him, whilst the British police who had been brought in to oversee the
21:11situation simply watched on and did nothing, the Queen started to send him a message of congratulations,
21:17and, as Will states, sent her son to legitimise him. Mugabe's men, at his command, had slaughtered
21:24hundreds of British women and children. Despite all this, the Queen threw her full weight behind him.
21:29Her behaviour was quite the same in Kenya. The Africans there massacred the whites, her very own people,
21:35that the Queen gave the new regime her full support, met with them and legitimised them.
21:40So yes, Elizabeth was atrocious abroad, but how about at home? Was she any better here?
21:45The answer is a resounding no. From the very moment the third world immigrants arrived in Britain,
21:51they began to terrorise the local population. In the 1950s, there were already grooming gangs across
21:56the north of England, which saw young white girls subjected to the most horrifying tortures imaginable.
22:02So, this horror continued to spread. During Elizabeth's reign, the case of minority on
22:07white crime only grew and grew. The nation's rape rate, murder rate and theft rate all increased,
22:14and every other kind of crime skyrocketed. Those who spoke up against these horrors were shut down
22:19and terrorised by the state. Not once did she lift a finger to protect her own people. The typical
22:24response to such a comment is to say that she is merely a figurehead, there is nothing she could say
22:29or do. Many claim that she was on our side the entire time, but just couldn't speak up because
22:34it would be improper or because it would bring about a crisis with the monarchy or some such other
22:38nonsense. The reality is that regardless of her actual de facto role, her majesty had the heart of
22:44the nation and was by far the most prestigious individual in the country. If she had cared or spoken
22:49up, it would have changed absolutely everything. The claim that she couldn't speak up as it would be
22:54improper is perhaps the most laughable line of all, because she actually, on several occasions,
22:59came right out and spoke out in favour of the invasion of the United Kingdom by third world
23:03immigrants and the replacement of the native population. The most egregious example by far
23:08is her 2004 Christmas message, which was subversive beyond belief.
23:12She began by stressing that Christmas is not just a break from work, but an important Christian
23:17religious festival. A wholesome start, you would expect that the rest of the message would be about
23:22Jesus Christ and the real meaning of Christmas. Instead, she immediately jumps right into trying
23:27to shove diversity down the public's throat, a complete justification of the presence of invaders
23:33in the United Kingdom and a continuation of the invasion itself. She says, quote,
23:37For me as a Christian, one of the most important of these teachings is contained in the parable of
23:42the Good Samaritan, when Jesus answers the question, who is my neighbour, end quote.
23:47She then goes on a long speech, beginning with how, quote,
23:50The implication drawn by Jesus is clear. Everyone is our neighbour, no matter what race,
23:55creed, or colour, end quote. One might think she means in general, as in, globally,
24:01everyone is our neighbour and we must treat them with respect, but that is far from what she meant,
24:06and she goes on to make that very clear. Her Majesty lectures us that we ought to respect others'
24:11backgrounds and urges everyone to cooperate. The mask then slips, and she finishes the speech in the
24:17following fashion, quote, There is certainly much more to be done and many challenges to be overcome.
24:23Discrimination still exists. Some people feel that their own beliefs are being threatened,
24:27some are unhappy about unfamiliar cultures. They all need to be reassured that there is so much to
24:32be gained by reaching out to others, that diversity is indeed a strength and not a threat. We need also
24:39to realise that peaceful and steady progress in our society of differing cultures and heritage can be
24:44threatened at any moment by the actions of extremists at home or by events abroad. We can
24:49certainly never be complacent. But there is every reason to be hopeful about the future. I certainly
24:54recognise that much has been achieved in my lifetime. I believe tolerance and fair play remain strong
25:00British values and we have so much to build on for the future. It was for this reason that I
25:05particularly enjoyed a story I heard the other day about an overseas visitor to Britain who said the
25:10best part of his visit had been travelling from Heathrow into central London on the Tube.
25:13His British friends were, as you can imagine, somewhat surprised, particularly as the visitor
25:19had been to some of the great attractions of the country. What do they mean? they asked.
25:23Because, he replied, I boarded the train just as the schools were coming out. At each stop,
25:29children were getting on and off. They were of every ethnic and religious background,
25:33some with scarves or turbans, some talking quietly, others playing and occasionally misbehaving together,
25:40completely at ease and trusting one another. How lucky you are, said the visitor, to live in a
25:45country where your children can grow up this way. I hope they will be allowed to enjoy this happy
25:49companionship for the rest of their lives. A happy Christmas to you all." If King Charles had uttered
25:55such subversive nonsense, then the British people, as with everything else he says, would be absolutely
26:00up in arms. Her statement reads as nothing else but, don't worry about those millions of foreign
26:05invaders pouring into your country with their foreign customs. Don't worry about the disappearance of
26:10your own people and your own culture before your very eyes. Somehow, I promise you, the arrival of
26:16untold millions of third world invaders will not threaten you in any way. Clips play in the background
26:20whilst this speech goes on, in which she meets with third world invaders and they tell her majesty their
26:25professions, usually some ridiculous anti-white nonsense. One woman says she does a lot of work
26:31around diversity in the workplace, that is, getting rid of white British workers and replacing them with
26:37new arrivals. The Queen responds to this particular woman saying, quote, wonderful work to be doing,
26:43end quote. Not one, but several of the Muslims she meets tell her majesty about how fast they are
26:48expanding. She has no objections at all. Others speak to Prince Charles, now King Charles,
26:54of how they're spreading Islam to a new breed of Islam. Again, no objections, and the clip was
27:00included in the Christmas message. The video ends with a clip of children singing from a school,
27:04in which the white children have been almost completely ethnically replaced. The camera pans
27:09from minority to minority, subversively pushing diversity in your face, whilst the children sing
27:14a wholesome Christmas song. The darker reality, of course, is that the British people had been
27:19ethnically cleansed from this area, and have had to relocate elsewhere for their own safety.
27:23That's why the school now looks the way it does. This is not a wholesome example of working together
27:28on diversity, but rather, a hostile occupation. Queen Elizabeth, again and again, said as a respectable
27:34face which was slapped on the most vile agenda possible. That being, the ethnic replacement of the
27:39British population. As the Queen, it is her job above all others to call out such a historic tragedy.
27:45Instead, she went along with it, promoted it, and rubber-stamped it every step of the way.
27:50Two years beforehand, in 2002, at her Golden Jubilee, she addressed Parliament and praised the
27:56British people as a, quote, moderate, pragmatic people, outward-looking and open-minded, end quote,
28:02and went on, quote, we are inventive and creative. Think of the record of British inventions over the
28:08past 50 years, or our present thriving art scene. We also take pride in our tradition of fairness and
28:14tolerance. The consolidation of our richly multicultural and multi-faith society, a major
28:20development since 1952, is being achieved remarkably peacefully and with much good will, end quote.
28:26Again, the establishment of a multicultural and multi-faith society as a kind of project
28:32is simply the ethnic replacement of the British people with new, third-world immigrants.
28:37Large swathes of the country had been dominated by foreigners. London itself, by that point, had seen
28:42half of its British population dispersed to the surrounding counties. There was no peace, there was no
28:48good will. These British people had to flee precisely because they were being subjected to a hostile
28:53invasion, in which their children, especially their daughters, were targeted by the invaders.
28:58She had no problem cheering on the replacement of her own religion, too. Remember, the Queen was the
29:03head of the Church of England. In 2012, she said her role as the head of the Anglican Church, quote,
29:09It's role is not to defend Anglicanism to the exclusion of other religions. The Church has a
29:15duty to protect the free practice of all faiths in this country, end quote. Anglican Church attendance
29:20by the time of Queen Elizabeth's death was around 1% of the population or less. A horrifying drop from
29:27what she had inherited in the 1950s. This video, as noted at the beginning, is merely an overview of
29:33Queen Elizabeth by no means a full history of every contribution to our decline, or her life in
29:38general. I hope, however, this will give you a more reasonable picture of who the late Queen actually
29:43was. Her son is lambasted for cheering on our ethnic replacement, but she was no different. Away from home,
29:50she actively cheered on the genocide of our own people. Charles certainly cannot say the same just yet.
29:56It's easy to look back at the propaganda view of the late Queen, and to think how good things were,
30:01but it's simply not reality. To those on the British right praising her, I say think again. Thank you.