00:01RULE 27D
00:02Siguiendo a further, and I quote RULE 27D
00:04Also permits the judge to poll the jury
00:07When a verdict is returned
00:09And before the verdict is recorded
00:11However, a judge is not required to accept a partial verdict
00:14Before declaring a mistrial
00:16So I'm asking that the court would entertain
00:18A poll of the jurors
00:20As to whether or not there has been a decision
00:22On murder 1, murder 2, manslaughter
00:25Anything like that
00:26And if that's the case, and I certainly would argue
00:28que la double jeopardy es attached,
00:30y los judges no pueden ser prosecuted again.
00:32I would object to that, Your Honor.
00:34I would go into the deliberations.
00:35I think we're in a different scenario here
00:37than the Reed case,
00:38where I believe in that case
00:39they did reach a verdict on certain charges
00:41and not on others.
00:43But I think here,
00:44where we've had a jury
00:45who's been deliberating for six and a half days,
00:48who's come back on multiple occasions
00:51saying that they're deadlocked,
00:52who have been given Tui,
00:54I don't think anything else is required at this point
00:56other than the declaration of a mistrial, unfortunately.
01:02I'm going to declare a mistrial at this point.
01:05All right.
01:06All right, we'll bring the jury in.
01:26All right.
01:28All right.
01:30Gracias.
