Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 50 minutes ago
An investigative report has revealed internal differences within the Election Commission of India, with two Election Commissioners raising objections at least 14 times over 10 months to decisions taken without their knowledge. The objections by Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi were marked to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and senior officials. Issues raised include the Special Intensive Revision that deleted 13 crore voters, the addition of a new clause to Form 6 for new voter enrolment, and the centralisation of software housing electoral rolls. Concerns were also noted over state-level officials being denied full access to the portal, unapproved appeals filed regarding excluded voters in West Bengal, and changes in the IT division. While the opposition demanded the suspension of the Chief Election Commissioner, the Election Commission stated that internal notes reflect standard deliberations and maintained that all decisions were taken unanimously.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00I want to start with a huge story, a story that exposes a major divide at the very top
00:07of India's election commission and in the line of fire is the chief election commissioner Gyanesh
00:13Kumar. An Indian Express report today has sensationally showed that on several occasions,
00:19at least 14 times in the last 10 months, the other two election commissioners had objected to what
00:25they call unauthorized and illegal decisions that were being taken by the election commission,
00:30including the manner in which addition and deletion of voters were being used through a
00:35centralized software. Despite this, those decisions went through. All of this has put the onus squarely
00:43on Gyanesh Kumar. The election commission is insisting that the decisions were taken unanimously
00:48despite the objections. But the opposition isn't listening. They want Gyanesh Kumar to be suspended
00:54and some are even saying that all the elections held under his tenure should now be cancelled and
01:02held afresh. The government is sticking by Gyanesh Kumar, but clearly the chief election commissioner
01:08now will have much to answer for. It's our top story tonight.
01:15The election commission is a divided house. Several issues linked to the special intensive revision
01:22that has deleted 13 crore people from electoral rolls have become a flashpoint.
01:29The Indian Express on Wednesday reported that two election commissioners, Sukbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi,
01:35put their objections on record 14 times in the last 10 months.
01:41The two election commissioners have flagged decisions taken and orders issued allegedly without their knowledge.
01:48The report claims the objections by the ECs were marked to chief election commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and in some cases
01:56deputy ECs.
02:00One of the objections is related to a new clause added to form 6 to be filled by new voters.
02:07The form now asks the applicants if their parents or grandparents are on the electoral roll of last SIR.
02:14The two VCs, according to the newspaper report, noted this is unauthorized and illegal and only the government could change
02:22form 6 by amending rules.
02:25The two VCs raised concerns about centralization of the software where the voter list resides.
02:31They point out that state-level officials were unable to get full access to Eronet portal which has the voter
02:39data.
02:40This, when the electoral registration officer is the statutory authority on the ground with powers to make corrections in voter
02:48list.
02:49Another issue flagged by the two VCs is the appeals pending in tribunals in West Bengal.
02:55The election commission recently informed the Supreme Court that 38 lakh appeals are pending, of which 22.21 lakh are
03:05filed by excluded voters to get back on the rolls.
03:08The remaining 16.10 lakh are filed to delete voters cleared by an adjudication process earlier.
03:16Election commissioner Sandhu asked the EC officials who authorized filing of appeals on behalf of EC seeking deletion of names.
03:24The newspaper report says Sandhu recorded that Joshi and Chief Electoral Officer of West Bengal were not informed about these
03:34appeals.
03:35The two VCs even wrote to Cabinet Secretary TV Somnathan on July 29th, after an official who supervised the IT
03:44division was removed without the approval of the VCs.
03:47A day later, the two VCs set aside the changes.
03:52Their note was sent to the CEC as well.
03:56The news report also cites how 97 voters cleared by an electoral registration officer could not be added to the
04:04voter list due to a software glitch.
04:06The ERO was enabled to include the names by January 29th, a deadline set by the Supreme Court.
04:13Reacting to the newspaper report, the election commission has issued a press release.
04:20The election commission says, highlighting certain specific internal notes, observations, give only one part of the picture.
04:28It adds that all decisions, including SIR, were unanimous.
04:33The EC claims its digital platforms, such as ECINET, operate under strict data security protocols.
04:41It claims statutory authorities, including electoral registration officers and district election officers, function as per law.
04:51The election commission's statement, however, is silent on addition of a new clause in Form 6 for new voters.
04:59Charges that the two ECs were kept in the dark on some decisions and centralization of voter list data.
05:06While the EC insists, all is well, the divide within is clearly too deep to be fixed easily.
05:14Bureau Report, India Today.

Recommended