00:00...for the upcoming Foundation training program.
00:02That actually sounds useful.
00:05The Foundation program only has two student seats.
00:08Charlotte Hawthorne.
00:09The lead council isn't included?
00:11The Foundation has its own selection criteria.
00:13What criteria?
00:14Alumni engagement, public representation, and long-term professional fit.
00:18Holistic again?
00:19It's only supplemental training.
00:21It won't affect your lead role.
00:23I know.
00:25Then go.
00:26You don't think it's unfair?
00:27I do.
00:28Because it's the Foundation's money.
00:31They can choose who they train.
00:33But they don't get to choose who argues for the team.
00:37They have three senior litigators.
00:40What do we have?
00:41Last year's national rounds.
00:43And?
00:43You.
00:45Be the most annoying judge you can.
00:48I can do that.
00:50Please!
00:57Extra-cuted training.
00:59Extra-coaching operates house in for under-size.
01:01Good.
01:03You can see a new self?
01:04Exactly.
01:05Coaching helps.
01:07Extra-coaching helps?
01:08Of course.
01:09You can admit it.
01:10I just did.
01:12One more.
01:16The facts changed.
01:18Your answer?
01:20Then the original argument no longer works.
01:23Dit from a new angle Dine Dad use.
01:24And even you, Dad, you're you, Shrin, making heaters.
01:27That's why you don't memorize answers.
01:29You're well-trained.
01:30She adapts faster.
01:34Why isn't your lead counsel in the Foundation program?
01:38The Foundation chooses its fellows.
01:46Ever thought about opening a real place?
01:49There's a small storefront open two blocks down.
01:52The cart's fine.
01:58This location won't stay empty.
02:00If you want it, decide today.
02:03Let me.
02:05The kitchen vent needs work.
02:06The backdoor lock is broken.
02:09Those can be fixed.
02:10Who pays?
02:12And there's been water damage here.
02:14Old issue.
02:15Then I'm not paying that deposit.
02:17We can sign a longer lease.
02:18But you fix the kitchen and the leak and cut one month off the deposit.
02:22No.
02:24Then we'll keep the cart.
02:27Half a week off.
02:30One month.
02:31Fine.
02:33He actually agreed?
02:36You were the one negotiating.
02:39Very impressive.
02:46My name is wrong.
02:47Our records show Hawthornton as a former family name.
02:50I don't use it now.
02:51Please put Zoe Santos.
02:54It doesn't have to be such a big deal.
02:57Everyone knows you used to be a Hawthorne.
02:59Then there's even less reason to print it.
03:01It's just a name.
03:03Exactly.
03:03So changing it should be easy.
03:06Change it.
03:07Do you have to fight Grandpa over everything?
03:09It's my name.
03:11Using Hawthorne doesn't cost you anything.
03:13Then try using Santos.
03:18You're not going over there?
03:19I don't know them.
03:20That's how introductions work.
03:23Maybe after the competition.
03:35One thing before we start.
03:37What?
03:38The Foundation wants both you and Charlotte at the sponsor dinner tomorrow.
03:41Fine.
03:42There's one more thing.
03:45The Foundation says it gives alumni useful context.
03:48No.
03:49Zoe, it's just event material.
03:52I'll attend the dinner.
03:53I'll meet every sponsor.
03:54I'll answer every question they have.
03:56But the name says Santos.
04:00Do you have to make everything difficult?
04:02I'm asking them to use my actual name.
04:04The Hawthorne Foundation is paying for this team.
04:07Then thank the Foundation.
04:09It doesn't change my name.
04:13Grandpa, she's completely ungrateful.
04:16Don't worry about it.
04:17The competition isn't tonight.
04:24Don't take my section.
04:26Same to you.
04:28Sumbria is public confidence.
04:29And Foundation, Foundation training really relates.
04:31Assume there's no documented personal relationship between the parties.
04:35Then we're no longer arguing the relationship itself creates the problem.
04:40The question becomes whether the institution still creates unequal access.
04:44Wouldn't your rule punish anyone with a family background?
04:46No.
04:47Background isn't the problem.
04:48The problem is when the rules produce different outcomes because of it.
04:55Thanks for the note.
04:57Sure.
04:59I would have gotten there.
05:01Then I won't write one next time.
05:02That's not what I meant.
05:11Your position sounds nice, but you were raised by a judicial dynasty.
05:15You benefited from Hawthorne schools, resources, and connections, and now you criticize the very system that helped you.
05:22Yes.
05:23I was raised in that family, which means I saw something earlier than most people.
05:28Having resources isn't wrongdoing.
05:30The issue is when a system starts treating a few people's advantages as everyone's normal starting point.
05:35Benefiting from it doesn't require me to pretend it doesn't exist.
05:39What about you?
05:40You're still a Hawthorne.
05:46My family background shouldn't answer the question for me.
05:48So, I'll answer the case.
05:52Why do they get to put our family on trial?
05:54Because we walked into a public argument.
05:56You're not angry?
05:58I am.
05:59But being angry and answering the question are two different things.
06:06A lot of important alumni are here today.
06:09Don't let everyone leave remembering only Zoe Santos.
06:12She's lead counsel?
06:13You're a Hawthorne.
06:15You should know what that means.
06:17Thanks family, complicate faces doing a dreyer.
06:20I'd add one point.
06:22So, Columbia's offering two different standards?
06:26No.
06:27Co-counsel was addressing the factual concern.
06:29Our legal standard remains the same.
06:33What was that?
06:35I'm allowed to answer.
06:36That wasn't your section.
06:37Do you think you're the only person allowed to speak?
06:39I think winning comes first.
06:41If you want the lead role, compete for it when we get back.
06:44Don't use the semi-final to prove you matter more than I do.
06:49Charlotte, stay within your assigned role.
06:51Fine.
06:57You're not going to yell at me again after the round.
06:59You're not worried I'll do it again?
07:01Do you want to lose?
07:05Today, we win.
07:07Okay.
07:08On what legal basis?
07:09On what legal basis?
07:10What if you disagree with lead counsel's standard?
07:16Then we should resolve that before entering the courtroom.
07:19Once we're here, we advocate one position.
07:22Relationships themselves don't destroy trust.
07:25Trust collapses when people start believing relationships matter more than rules.
07:31National Moot Court Championship, Columbia University.
07:37Best oral applicant, Zoe Santos.
07:47Why didn't you tell me the final was today?
07:50You were busy.
07:51Not too busy for this.
07:53I didn't understand half of it.
07:56But I understood you when you stood up.
07:58Champion sister!
08:00Why are you here?
08:01The store isn't open yet.
08:02I have time.
08:03Doctor says I shouldn't stay up late.
08:04Then why are you here?
08:05National champions are rarer.
08:11Why did you lose control in the semifinal?
08:13We won.
08:15You weren't best advocate.
08:16Don't let emotion affect your judgment again.
08:19You told me not to let everyone remember only her.
08:21I didn't tell you to jeopardize the round.
08:25You still have a lot to learn.
08:29Can we put that in the store?
08:31No.
08:31Why?
08:32It's mine.
08:34That one's yours.
08:37She's right.
08:38Then we keep both safe.
08:41National champions don't clean tables.
08:43This champion lives here.
08:47National champions don't clean tables.
