1
- 2 days ago
Category
📺
TVTranscript
00:02What exactly is overall profile?
00:05Good question.
00:07Nationals aren't just an individual test.
00:10We also consider who best represents Columbia.
00:16Isn't that basically who knows more people here?
00:22Charlotte, lead oralist.
00:24Lena, Ressantos, alternate researcher.
00:27What?
00:31Wasn't she first on the blind test?
00:33Charlotte was third.
00:35Don't do this.
00:36The written score is only one part.
00:38I'm sure Zoe understands.
00:42I understand the rules.
00:44I didn't say they made sense.
00:47Santos, do you have a question?
00:48Yes.
00:50The written component has a score.
00:53Oral performance has a rubik.
00:55Teamwork has written feedback.
00:56How much does overall profile count?
01:00It's determined holistically by the committee.
01:02So there's no fixed percentage?
01:04Not everything can be reduced to a number.
01:07Fine.
01:09Are you okay?
01:10I'm fine.
01:11Alternates are important too.
01:14You like the alternate spot that much?
01:16You can have it later.
01:26You're really letting this go?
01:28Who said that?
01:29Then why didn't you keep asking?
01:32Because right now I only know it looks unfair.
01:34If you want to challenge a rule,
01:35let it expose its own problem first.
01:46Petitioner's first argument.
01:48A judge should not automatically recuse
01:50based on a long-standing personal relationship.
01:52What if that relationship repeatedly gives one side meaningful access?
01:57Then you'd need proof of actual bias.
02:00Authority?
02:03Volume 3, page 147.
02:07Good research.
02:10Thanks.
02:12See?
02:13Alternates matter.
02:14We might have missed that case without you.
02:16You're right.
02:17So next time, try remembering it yourself.
02:23No fighting within the team.
02:25I was giving feedback.
02:35No.
02:35I'm doing it myself today.
02:39She got it wrong twice this morning.
02:42Third time's the charm.
02:46I got it.
02:48Congratulations.
02:48Don't laugh.
02:50I'm not.
02:53Mrs. Santos, can you cater another student event next week?
02:57How many people?
02:58120.
03:01We can do it.
03:02I'll send the order tomorrow.
03:08Is 120 too much?
03:10You sounded confident five seconds ago.
03:12The customer was standing there.
03:16Help me calculate it.
03:18Thought I wasn't allowed.
03:20Now you are.
03:28She doesn't even get to argue in a practice round?
03:30Rolls are set.
03:32Lena, don't make this uncomfortable for Zoe.
03:35She didn't.
03:36So you feel slighted?
03:38A little?
03:40First on the written examine, my practice responses are strong.
03:43And I still haven't been given one minute to argue.
03:47It's reasonable to question that.
03:49National teams need more than intelligence.
03:51They need people who represent the institution well.
03:55Where have I been immature?
03:57Don't put Professor Bennett on the spot.
03:59What?
04:00I asked him.
04:04Don't be rude to Solcher as distant NYU bias upon it proving efting excessness.
04:10You're saying actual bias must be proven?
04:12Correct.
04:13Then how do you distinguish Marshall?
04:17It's a trap.
04:20Marshall is factually distinct.
04:22How?
04:28Why didn't anyone flag Marshall?
04:30Zoe did.
04:32Why didn't you say it sooner?
04:34I did.
04:36You barely said anything because I'm the alternative.
04:39I've been repeatedly told not to overstep my role.
04:43Oh.
04:51Five minutes.
04:53Zoe, I need the cases.
04:58You already prepared these?
05:00Yesterday.
05:01Why didn't you give them to me?
05:02They're in the shared folder.
05:04She uploaded them at 10 last night.
05:10You flagged Marshall?
05:12Yes.
05:13Why are you sitting in the back?
05:15She's an alternate researchers.
05:17You're Santos.
05:19Top written score?
05:20Yes.
05:23Our selection is holistic.
05:26I didn't ask.
05:28We reset strategy next week.
05:31Santos.
05:33Extra practice tomorrow.
05:35Research?
05:37Oral.
05:47Ten minutes.
05:49Same problem.
05:50Your petitioner.
05:52Okay.
05:54This case isn't about whether a judge took money.
05:56It's about whether the public still has reason to believe the rules apply equally.
06:01Legal basis?
06:03Counter example?
06:06What if your own family came from a judicial dynasty?
06:10Then I should be even more careful not to treat family access as a normal standard.
06:15Are you criticizing the Hawthorns?
06:17I'm answering the legal question.
06:22Good.
06:23Thanks.
06:26She's had a lot of time to prepare.
06:29I just mean we haven't all had the same practice opportunities.
06:32You're the lead.
06:33You've had more practice than I have.
06:36Enough.
06:38Next scrimmage.
06:40Your second chair.
06:42What about the current second chair?
06:44Rotation.
06:47Don't take over my section.
06:49If you can answer, I won't.
06:52I won't.
06:52First shortly.
06:52I'm known to take over my section.
06:54If you answer, you do.
06:55Work during your emergency.
06:56Do you want to test any?
07:01I know how this scray lists.
07:03Where are you cert list?
07:03If every long relationship requires recusal, how does the court function?
07:07We're not arguing every relationship requires recusal.
07:10We're arguing that when a private relationship repeatedly creates institutional advantage, pretending it doesn't exist is no longer neutral.
07:20We won!
07:21Can you let go now?
07:24You should be lead counsel.
07:27She was second chair today.
07:30I noticed.
07:33We don't have enough fridge space.
07:35The cart won't hold everything.
07:38Then take fewer orders.
07:41If you can't do it well, say no.
07:43Don't ruin the reputation for one bigger payday.
07:47Then I'll tell them we can only do 80.
07:49What if they get upset?
07:51Better than serving bad food.
07:58Again?
07:59This is the committee's final decision.
08:03Zoe made the official team.
08:04Alternate counsel still matters.
08:07Where are the score sheets?
08:09Excuse me?
08:11The last two oral rounds were scored.
08:13I want to see them.
08:14Internal records.
08:15The selection policy says students can request their own scoring feedback.
08:21So I'm requesting it.
08:23Do you really need to make this ugly?
08:26Asking for my own scores?
08:28What's ugly about that?
08:36Then why is she still the alternate?
08:40Overall profile.
08:41Specifically?
08:43Public representation, alumni engagement, institutional events.
08:46None of those had published weights before selection.
08:49If they can override the top written and oral scores, they shouldn't become important only after the results are known.
08:57So anyone with lower scores doesn't deserve a place?
09:00I didn't say that.
09:01I said the rules should be clear before the competition.
09:08I said the rules should be clear before the competition.
09:11To resolve the concern, we're offering a supplementary oral assessment.
09:15Why should we be rescored?
09:17Because the waiting for overall profile wasn't sufficiently defined.
09:20But the roster was already announced.
09:23Happy now?
09:24It hasn't started yet.
09:26Blind again?
09:28Sounds fair.
09:32Blind is fine with me.
09:33Good.
09:37Candidate 12.
09:40Tootlesiqui details with Nate.
09:43If the facts change, the conclusion can change.
09:48A legal position isn't a loyalty test.
09:50The rule is what has to stay consistent.
10:06Zoe Santos.
10:16Lead counsel?
10:18I can read.
10:23Congratulations.
10:25Thanks.
10:25You really are good at tests.
10:27Nationals won't be like a blind campus evaluation.
10:30People will know who you are.
10:32I know.
10:33They'll know you're a Santos.
10:35Even better.
10:36I like the name.
10:43How'd it go?
10:45Lead counsel.
10:47What's that?
10:50I'm the first one who gets up and argues.
10:52That sounds like you.
10:54Why?
10:55You've had plenty to say since the day you came home.
11:01Extra piece today.
11:03Didn't Dad say extras lose money?
11:06Yours doesn't count.
11:11Better teamwork than I expected.
11:14Same.
11:19Grandpa.
11:21Lead counsel.
11:23Yeah.
11:23You've kept busy since leaving the Hawthorns.
11:26Mostly school.
11:27And turning a team selection into a public controversy?
11:30I asked to see my own scores.
11:32Do you know what I dislike?
11:33No.
11:35And I'm not especially curious.
11:38Still the same.
11:40Blind written test you came first.
11:43Blind oral assessment first again.
11:44So?
11:45So now you think hiding names makes everything fair.
11:49Nationals aren't a blind test.
11:51Judges know where you come from.
11:53Alumni know your name.
11:55Firms, clerks, professors.
11:56Many of them know each other before they ever sit down.
11:58So what?
11:59Nothing.
12:00I'm reminding you.
12:02Scores can get you through a door.
12:04But students don't always decide when certain doors open.
12:07Then I'll use the doors that are open.
12:09I'll deal with the rest when I get there.
12:12Prepare well for Nationals.
12:13I will.
12:15You don't have to use the Hawthorn name.
12:17But don't assume this world forgets where you were raised.
12:20That's their problem.
12:26That's convenient?
12:29You don't have to wait to see what's going on, you know.