Skip to playerSkip to main content
'DEFENSE OPPOSES PROSECUTION'S BID TO PUT VP SARA ON WITNESS STAND'

#VPSaraOnTrial Day 23 RECAP: The prosecution decided not to present its remaining witnesses during the 23rd day of Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial, saying previous testimonies were sufficient to establish an alleged “pattern” in the misuse of confidential funds.

During the trial, the prosecution also announced its intention to present Duterte herself as a witness before the impeachment court.

Subscribe to the Manila Bulletin Online channel! -
https://www.youtube.com/TheManilaBulletin

Visit our website at http://mb.com.ph
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/manilabulletin
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/manila_bulletin
Instagram: https://instagram.com/manilabulletin
Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@manilabulletin

#VPSaraOnTrial
#ManilaBulletinOnline
#ManilaBulletin
#LatestNews

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00And this is why all of these pawns and castles and horses and bishops point to only one person, and
00:09that accountable person is the vice president.
00:11And that is why, Your Honor, in lieu of presenting 15 other witnesses, we will be presenting the vice president
00:20herself.
00:23As regards use, misuse, misappropriation of confidential funds, which is Article 1 of the Articles of Impeachment, in that kind
00:39of request.
00:41Because, just on five points, because the Constitution prohibits this kind of testimonial compulsion from the accused herself.
00:51I know that the response would be, this is sui generis, this is not exactly a purely criminal proceeding.
00:59But nonetheless, when Section 17, Article 3 of our 1987 Constitution, put in that guarantee that no person shall be
01:09compelled to testify against himself or to be a witness,
01:12or that there should not be a testimonial compulsion from the accused herself, it did not qualify that provision.
01:23The defense invoked the constitutional rights of the respondent.
01:28We wish to invoke as well, that even the Filipino people whom we represent are entitled to these constitutional rights.
01:36The Filipino people, Your Honor, have the right to hear the answer of the respondent vice president to all these
01:44four allegations under the Articles of Impeachment.
01:47That is for the record, Your Honor.
01:49First of all, if you're honest, please, I think it's very clear that this is not a criminal trial.
01:54This is an impeachment trial where the outcome will only determine whether the vice president can continue to serve as
02:03vice president,
02:03and whether there will be any perpetual disqualification imposed on her.
02:08No imprisonment, no fine, no other element of criminal case is involved in this impeachment trial.
02:17So one is on medical leave abroad, with the date of her return still unknown.
02:23The other is in hiding.
02:26Two are under the custody of the Sandigan Bayan or the Bureau of Jail Management.
02:35My question as a presiding officer is this.
02:39Considering the changing calendar and expedited proceedings, if we were to cast our votes
02:46two or three months from now or next month or even tomorrow,
02:52who among our members can validly cast their votes on the final question?
Comments

Recommended