00:00Pangalawa, yung order on admissibility of our evidence.
00:05Ang magandang nangyari dyan, in-admit lahat ng evidence ng prosecution ang presiding officer.
00:14What does that mean?
00:15One of the objections to the evidence of the prosecution is yung mga prinisinta daw na documents sa impeachment court,
00:26hindi naman naka-attach daw sa impeachment complaint, and therefore, dapat i-exclude.
00:35Ang Saba, tama ang ruling ng presiding officer.
00:39Ang isang impeachment complaint, alam natin lahat dyan.
00:43Hindi naman kailangan lahat ng ebidensya i-attach sa complaint, no?
00:47Because a complaint must only have what is called ultimate facts.
00:52Ultimate facts, who, what, where, when, how.
00:57Ultimate facts lang ang isang impeachment complaint.
01:02Yung mga dokumento na prinisinta, ang tawag dyan e evidentiary facts, no?
01:09Evidence.
01:11So, dinisasabi ng presiding officer, hindi naman violation yan na hindi in-attach lahat ng documents.
01:20Nakita nyo naman, we had how many boxes, 52, iambang 52 boxes namin of evidence, i-attach sa complaint.
01:28So, sabi ng presiding officer, that ground has no merit.
01:34Pangalawa, sinabi nila fishing expedition.
01:37Eh, hindi naman po daw fishing expedition.
01:40Ano, itong impeachment, yung officer, yung offer of exhibits namin, ano?
01:47Kasi, nagsabpina daw kami ng mga documents na wala naman sa possession namin.
01:53Eh, that is the nature of the beast.
01:55Yun ang ibig sabihin ng sabpina.
01:57Magproduce kayo ng dokumento para malaman natin kung totoo man o hindi ang allegasyon ng prosecution.
02:06So, it is not a fishing expedition.
02:08It is within the power of the impeachment court to issue subpinas to produce documents.
02:18Hindi po fishing expedition yan.
02:21Pangatlong reason dyan, eh, bakit daw yung mga nangyari before she became vice president in 2022,
02:31yung mga bank accounts niya, yung mga insurance policies niya, yung mga investments niya,
02:37bakit pa inalaw ng impeachment court?
02:41Ang sabi ng presiding officer, this is admissible.
02:46Establish mo ang baseline.
02:48To establish a baseline.
02:50Anong ibig sabihin?
02:51Ano yung baseline?
02:53Siyempre, pag ganito ang income mo ng 2025,
02:57saan nanggaling yung income?
02:58Di papakita mo yung earlier, no?
03:01Yung earlier income at paano naging ganito ng 2025.
03:07So, all the records have been admitted.
03:12All the evidence, testimonial, and documentary have been admitted by the impeachment court
03:20through the presiding officer.
03:23Isa lang ang excluded doon, yung papers regarding JTC, no?
03:27Kasi, excluded doon, yung JTC Corporation na owned by isang Mr. Cruz, no?
03:39So, that is the only evidence excluded.
03:42So, anong ibig sabihin nun?
03:44Ang ibig sabihin nun, eh, lahat po ng evidence, eh, admitted.
03:52Iba ang admissibility, iba ang probative value.
03:57Hindi ibig sabihin na porke inadmit ng presiding officer ang exhibits, eh, totoo na yun.
04:04Iweweigh pa nila yung probative value.
04:07Ano?
04:07Ano ang weight?
04:09Ano ang weight?
04:11Nang ebidensya nito?
04:12So, ito ba ay meritorious to explain unexplained wealth, no?
04:18So, yung admissibility is not a ruling on probative value or on the merits of the evidence itself, no?
04:27Iba pa yan.
04:29So, yun ang dalamang orders ng presiding officer.
04:34At wala nang obstacle, no?
04:36Para magpisinta dapat ang defense.
04:39Kasi, nisip ng prosecution, nako, baka sabihin nila, eh, hindi pa naman nagro-ruling ang impeachment court sa ebidensya ng
04:48prosecution, ano?
04:49So, we're very happy that that was timely ruled upon today.
